RE: Bug in g++: Testcase exits with segmentation fault

2003-01-14 Thread Boris Schaeling
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris > January > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:01 PM > To: Boris Schaeling > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Bug in g++: Testcase exits with segmentation fault >

Bug in g++: Testcase exits with segmentation fault

2003-01-13 Thread Boris Schaeling
The testcase attached to this mail compiled with g++ 2.95.3-10 or g++ 3.2 20020927 under Cygwin 1.3.18 exits with segmentation fault. It seems to be an error in g++ as the testcase doesn't work under Linux either. Can anyone help or do I have to report this error to the GCC website? BTW I found tw

1999 C++ bug reappears after upgrade to 1.3.17

2002-12-06 Thread Boris Schaeling
I upgraded Cygwin 1.3.12-2 to 1.3.17-1 and now can't run one of my C++ programs any more: A simple call of a virtual member function crashs Windows 98 (no problems under Linux). I found a bug report dated 03/1999 that reminds me of my C++ program and has a testcase attached that causes a Blue Scree

AW: modified poll() patch

2002-03-19 Thread Boris Schaeling
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag > von Corinna Vinschen > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. März 2002 11:55 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: modified poll() patch > [...] > thanks for the patch but could you please send a diff related

modified poll() patch

2002-03-16 Thread Boris Schaeling
Here is the new poll() patch. Now invalid descriptors are recognized (invalid = positive descriptors including 0 which are not open). If there are invalid descriptors poll() returns immediately with the count of invalid descriptors. The timer value is ignored. That's the way Linux handles this cas

AW: Latest poll() hangs again (was Re: poll() bugs and patch)

2002-03-15 Thread Boris Schaeling
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag > von Corinna Vinschen > Gesendet: Freitag, 15. März 2002 23:28 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: Latest poll() hangs again (was Re: poll() bugs and patch) > [...] > I'm inclined to revert the

AW: poll() bugs and patch

2002-03-14 Thread Boris Schaeling
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag > von Corinna Vinschen > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. März 2002 13:16 > An: cygwin > Betreff: Re: poll() bugs and patch > [...] > Thanks for the patch. I've applied it with some changes. Sorry for >

AW: poll() bugs and patch

2002-03-13 Thread Boris Schaeling
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag > von Corinna Vinschen > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. März 2002 18:14 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: poll() bugs and patch > [...] > > Actually, I'm inclined to just let this one in. There isn'

AW: poll() bugs and patch

2002-03-13 Thread Boris Schaeling
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag > von Corinna Vinschen > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. März 2002 15:06 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: poll() bugs and patch > [...] > Thanks for the patch but that's not quite the way to contribu

poll() bugs and patch

2002-03-13 Thread Boris Schaeling
There are several bugs in poll(): - poll() must return 0 if no descriptor is ready and the timer expires. It works correctly if all descriptors are non-negative. Otherwise poll() returns the count of negative descriptors which is wrong. - The implementation of poll() must call cygwin_select() even