Re: dlopen() bug (new testcase)

2006-03-30 Thread Bernhard Loos
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Eric Blake Gesendet: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:04:27 + (UTC) >Bernhard Loos web.de> writes: >> >> >You'll have to read the archives. Eric Blake has talked about this very >> >recently. >> >> Sorry, but I&

Re: dlopen() bug (new testcase)

2006-03-30 Thread Bernhard Loos
Libary returns. _cygtls::return_from_fault is called at 00.781 from the cygwin exception handler. It restores the old handler befor it returns and but at this point, crashtest.dll isn't loaded any more. Inserting the line _my_tls.init_exception_handler (_cygtls::handle_exceptions); in t

Re: dlopen() bug (new testcase)

2006-03-29 Thread Bernhard Loos
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Christopher Faylor > Gesendet: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:15:34 -0500 >On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 01:10:56AM +0200, Bernhard Loos wrote: >>I looked at the problem again this week, but unfortunately I'm unable >>to debug anything happ

Re: dlopen() bug (new testcase)

2006-03-29 Thread Bernhard Loos
Hello I looked at the problem again this week, but unfortunately I'm unable to debug anything happening after the first SIGSEGV. I inserted a view OutputDebugString()-calls and got those results: 00:00:00.703: LoadLibraryA("H:\cygwin\test\CrashTest\CrashTest.dll") called from "CYGWIN1.DLL" at ad

Re: dlopen() bug (new testcase)

2006-03-22 Thread Bernhard Loos
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: skaller userssourceforgenet> > On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 03:35 +0100, Bernhard Loos wrote: > > > If the C++library declares its calls as 'extern "C"' (as it is done in the > > example), > > AFAIK there s

Re: dlopen() bug

2006-03-21 Thread Bernhard Loos
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: skaller users sourceforge net> > Gesendet: 21.03.06 20:31:08 > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 19:52 +0100, Bernhard Loos wrote: > > Hello > > > > Is there any progress in solving the problem mentioned in this thread: > &

dlopen() bug

2006-03-21 Thread Bernhard Loos
Hello Is there any progress in solving the problem mentioned in this thread: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00274.html ? Because this is also prevents qt-applications from even starting. Bernhard __ Verschicken Sie rom