Re: c:/ seems to be accessed in binary even if cygwin is configured as textmode by default (documentation alert)

2004-09-01 Thread Arnaud Mouiche
At 17:02 01/09/2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Arnaud Mouiche wrote: >well. c: is binary > >here a bug. >cygpath -M c:/foo returns > >>> cygpath: file 'c:/foo' - No error > >looking at CVS code and strace, flags are

Re: c:/ seems to be accessed in binary even if cygwin is configured as textmode by default (documentation alert)

2004-09-01 Thread Arnaud Mouiche
well. c: is binary here a bug. cygpath -M c:/foo returns >> cygpath: file 'c:/foo' - No error looking at CVS code and strace, flags are set to zero instead of 0xa; the file is nor binary nor text Correct. There's really no need for more discussion about this. This behavior has been in place

Re: c:/ seems to be accessed in binary even if cygwin is configured as textmode by default

2004-09-01 Thread Arnaud Mouiche
em that is not mounted (as can happen when the path contains a drive letter), the default is text. " In understand that a windows path ([...] the path contains a drive letter ) should be seen as text file. This not what I experience. arnaud At 09:48 01/09/2004, Arnaud Mouiche wrote: At 1

Re: c:/ seems to be accessed in binary even if cygwin is configured as textmode by default

2004-09-01 Thread Arnaud Mouiche
At 19:55 31/08/2004, Larry Hall wrote: At 01:38 PM 8/31/2004, you wrote: >Hi. > >just make a fresh update (from a long time). I mount my system in textmode by default. >yet, > >c:/file seems to be accessed in binary mode >/cygdrive/c/file is accessed in text mode > >Is it the new default behaviour

c:/ seems to be accessed in binary even if cygwin is configured as textmode by default

2004-08-31 Thread Arnaud Mouiche
Hi. just make a fresh update (from a long time). I mount my system in textmode by default. yet, c:/file seems to be accessed in binary mode /cygdrive/c/file is accessed in text mode Is it the new default behaviour ? Is there a configuration that I missed ? thanks Arnaud here a simple proof $