Re: Compile as DOS application?

2025-06-01 Thread Brian Inglis via Cygwin
On 2025-06-01 10:47, Eric J Korpela via Cygwin wrote: To be more explicit, a text mode windows program is not a DOS program. It will do anything useful on a DOS system without windows. If you desire 32-bit protected mode DOS programs, DJGPP may be your best option. New builds of DJGPP are avai

Re: Cygwin package vim breaks the command 'view'

2025-06-01 Thread Lee via Cygwin
On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 11:16 AM andkin773--- via Cygwin wrote: > > Hi, > > I missed something, > According to > https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/17039 : > > Looks like problem was introduced in 9.1.1054-1 > > I downgraded vim to check: > $ cygcheck -c | grep vim > vim 9.0.21

Re: Compile as DOS application?

2025-06-01 Thread Hans-Bernhard Bröker via Cygwin
Am 01.06.2025 um 18:47 schrieb Eric J Korpela via Cygwin: To be more explicit, a text mode windows program is not a DOS program. It will do anything useful on a DOS system without windows.   ^ not If you desire 32-bit protected mode DOS programs, DJGPP may be your best option. New b

CCP_WIN_A_TO_POSIX and encodings

2025-06-01 Thread Jeremy Drake via Cygwin
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141864 I was going to say that passing an already-posix path through cygwin_conv_path(CPP_WIN_A_TO_POSIX, ...) was unsafe because Windows ANSI file paths are either CP_ACP or CP_OEMCP, while Cygwin POSIX path encodings are based on the C locale encoding (us

Re: Compile as DOS application?

2025-06-01 Thread Eric J Korpela via Cygwin
To be more explicit, a text mode windows program is not a DOS program. It will do anything useful on a DOS system without windows. If you desire 32-bit protected mode DOS programs, DJGPP may be your best option. New builds of DJGPP are available at http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/ . I'm not sure i

Re: cygin 3.6.2-1 under Win11 24H2: Cannot launch: no available terminals

2025-06-01 Thread Thomas Wolff via Cygwin
Am 01.06.2025 um 10:02 schrieb Roumen Petrov via Cygwin: Hello, FYI: I have the same issue on the same date. На 28.05.25 г. в 15:52 ч., Robert Fensterman via Cygwin написа: [SNIP] Error: Could not fork child process: There are no available terminals The message is reported by mintty if forkpt

Re: Re: Cygwin package vim breaks the command 'view'

2025-06-01 Thread andkin773--- via Cygwin
(I'm not sure if this reply is addressed correctly for the mailing list) > did > alias view >/dev/null 2>&1 || alias view=vim -R > need quotes also ? Yes. To be honest, I don't understand why you ask this? It's easier to see in interactive bash: $ alias view=vim -R -bash: alias: -R: not found $

Re: Cygwin package vim breaks the command 'view'

2025-06-01 Thread andkin773--- via Cygwin
Hi, I missed something, According to https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/17039 : > Looks like problem was introduced in 9.1.1054-1 I downgraded vim to check: $ cygcheck -c | grep vim vim 9.0.2155-2 OK vim-common 9.1.1054-1 Incomp

Re: Compile as DOS application?

2025-06-01 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin
On 31/05/2025 18:50, Lee wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 11:16 AM Jon Turney wrote: On 31/05/2025 01:33, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2025 09:00:10 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2025 00:39:24 +0200 Dan Shelton wrote: Hello! Does Cygwin have a compiler which allows

Re: openssl and libcurl issue with cargo

2025-06-01 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin
On 25/05/2025 17:53, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: On Sun, 25 May 2025, ASSI via Cygwin wrote: Jeremy Drake via Cygwin writes: Apparently the fix that MSYS2 made for openssl in https://github.com/msys2/MSYS2-packages/pull/3448 is also not present in Cygwin, so cargo continues to crash after

Re: cygin 3.6.2-1 under Win11 24H2: Cannot launch: no available terminals

2025-06-01 Thread Roumen Petrov via Cygwin
Hello, FYI: I have the same issue on the same date. На 28.05.25 г. в 15:52 ч., Robert Fensterman via Cygwin написа: [SNIP] Error: Could not fork child process: There are no available terminals (-1) [SNIP] Also I found the same work-around i.e., revert from 3.6.2-1 to 3.6.1-1. Robert report