Re: Regression in syslog-ng with libglib2.0_0 f2.84.0-1

2025-05-04 Thread Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin
On 2025-05-04 3:14 p.m., Sam Edge via Cygwin wrote: Calling the maintainer for syslog-ng and/or libglib2.0. The latest Cygwin release of these packages are still exhibiting the same assertion. If syslog-ng has become orphaned could someone please let me know and I'll check it out myself and

Re: Regression in syslog-ng with libglib2.0_0 f2.84.0-1

2025-05-04 Thread Sam Edge via Cygwin
On 28/03/2025 11:20, Sam Edge via Cygwin wrote: On 28/03/2025 11:00, Sam Edge via Cygwin wrote: I've had a weird regression with syslog-ng recently. Dunno if it's related to a new release of the Cygwin DLL because I've only just spotted it. When I try to start syslog-ng as a service recently i

Re: gtkmm3.0 needs to be repackaged

2025-05-04 Thread Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin
On 2025-05-03 7:31 p.m., Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin wrote: The *.pc file name included in cairomm1.0 has changed, and gtkmm3.0 needs to adapt to this change. I think we might have another problem, namely that the last update to cairomm broke it. gtkmm2.0 and pangomm1.4 couldn't be rebuilt

Re: Signing cygwin.com binaries with signtool by default ?

2025-05-04 Thread Christian Franke via Cygwin
Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote: Or get a free Let's Encrypt cert as many orgs do. Unfortunately Let's Encrypt does not support code signing: https://letsencrypt.org/docs/faq/#does-let-s-encrypt-issue-certificates-for-anything-other-than-ssl-tls-for-websites -- Regards, Christian -- Problem r

Re: Signing cygwin.com binaries with signtool by default ?

2025-05-04 Thread Brian Inglis via Cygwin
Or get a free Let's Encrypt cert as many orgs do. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada La perfection est atteinte Perfection is achieved non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter not when there is no more to add mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus r

Re: Signing cygwin.com binaries with signtool by default ?

2025-05-04 Thread Brian Inglis via Cygwin
Yes - Cygwin is licensed as GPL V3 or later - and the DLL is LGPL V3 or later WITH Linking Exception; see: https://cygwin.com/licensing.html and the files CYGWIN_LICENSE, COPYING, COPYING.LIB, other instances of COPYING and LICENSE files in /usr/share/doc/**/ directories, especially cygw

Re: Signing cygwin.com binaries with signtool by default ?

2025-05-04 Thread James Hanley via Cygwin
Cygwin as an organization can act as your own CA and leave it up to IT organizations to add the Cygwin public TA cert to the CA trust store. -Jim > On May 3, 2025, at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > On Sat, 3 May 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote: > >>> On 2025-05-03 12:21, Rola

Re: Signing cygwin.com binaries with signtool by default ?

2025-05-04 Thread James Hanley via Cygwin
Break the license rules? How - is it GPLv3? -Jim > On May 3, 2025, at 3:09 PM, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote: > > On 2025-05-03 12:21, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote: >> Is it somehow possible that the CI+Release binaries (*.exe, *.dll) can >> be signed with signtool >> (https://learn.microsoft.