Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: gcc -pg broken after cygwin update?

2022-12-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
On Dec 8 16:02, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: > Sorry for pressing this, I must be slow today. > > > just won't run correctly anymore on W7/8 > > Won't or may not? Won't Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: gcc -pg broken after cygwin update?

2022-12-08 Thread Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin
Sorry for pressing this, I must be slow today. > just won't run correctly anymore on W7/8 Won't or may not? Anton Lavrentiev Contractor NIH/NLM/NCBI -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https://cygwin.com

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: gcc -pg broken after cygwin update?

2022-12-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
On Dec 8 14:47, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: > > for 3.5 (late 2023) we announced the deprecation of Windows 7 and 8 > > since the first 3.3.0 release in October 2021. > > I saw that. It did not look alarming. It basically was like "you'll be on > your own". > > > Su

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: gcc -pg broken after cygwin update?

2022-12-08 Thread Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin
> for 3.5 (late 2023) we announced the deprecation of Windows 7 and 8 > since the first 3.3.0 release in October 2021. I saw that. It did not look alarming. It basically was like "you'll be on your own". > Supporting older OSes requires to keep workarounds in the code and Understood. But you

Re: Performance regression in cygwin 3.4.0

2022-12-08 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin
On Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:38:19 + tryandbuy wrote: > Reading from stdin is very slow when a process runs outside of Cygwin > Terminal. > > Steps to reproduce: > 1. Create "test.txt" file using python code: > long_text = "10" * 2500 > with open(r'test.txt', 'w') as f: > for i in range(5000):

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: gcc -pg broken after cygwin update?

2022-12-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
On Dec 7 17:59, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: > > contains patches dropping W7 and W8 support: > > Hmm... I understood that "dropping support" was not something that > would _require_ newer OS, but that it may not work (or not guaranteed > to work, patches not checked for