On 2022-07-19 21:03, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2022-07-19 15:06, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/19/2022 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2022-07-19 12:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/19/2022 1:07 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be
installed by anyone.
Then
On 2022-07-19 15:06, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/19/2022 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2022-07-19 12:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/19/2022 1:07 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be
installed by anyone.
Then shouldn't you remove it? And you could al
Cygwin Support Dear Representatives
Thank you very much for your reply.
>This seems to be behaviour change betweeen OpenSSH 8.x and 9.0.
You are right.
Referring to the URL below, the problem is caused by the change in the protocol
used by the scp command by default in the latest OpenSSH (9.0p
On 2022-07-19, Kutty, Rejeesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently ran the installer and it updated vim to 8.2
>
> :version
> VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 (2019 Dec 12, compiled Feb 13 2022 22:00:24)
> Included patches: 1-4372
>
>
> Now when I open a perl script, I get the following message:
>
> Command termi
On 7/19/2022 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2022-07-19 12:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/19/2022 1:07 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be installed by
anyone.
Then shouldn't you remove it? And you could also upload an override.hint file
with a
On 2022-07-19 12:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/19/2022 1:07 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be
installed by anyone.
Then shouldn't you remove it? And you could also upload an
override.hint file with a "replace-versions" line for the sake of pe
Hi,
I recently ran the installer and it updated vim to 8.2
:version
VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 (2019 Dec 12, compiled Feb 13 2022 22:00:24)
Included patches: 1-4372
Now when I open a perl script, I get the following message:
Command terminated
Error detected while processing BufRead Autocommands
On 7/19/2022 1:07 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be installed by
anyone.
Then shouldn't you remove it? And you could also upload an override.hint file
with a "replace-versions" line for the sake of people who have already installed it.
K
Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be
installed by anyone.
Setup now also shows coreutils 9.0 in test, and it can and should be
installed by anyone who experienced issues with coreutils 9.1.
I ran coreutils 9.0 for a couple of weeks in my installs before
releasing i
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:46 AM Brian Inglis wrote:
> Setup still shows 9.1 as test, but it should not be installed by anyone.
> Setup now also shows 9.0 in test, and it can and should be installed by
> anyone who experienced issues with 9.1.
9.0 (test) is working for me now, whereas 9.1 did not
On 7/19/2022 11:50 AM, René Berber wrote:
[snip]
Do it by hand as I described, then adjust your scrip or whatever you are
using (apparently you depend on setup.ini, which seems to be out of sync
in your case).
Or not, see Brian Inglis message.
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/probl
On 7/19/2022 6:34 AM, Keith Christian wrote:
The installed version of coreutils is 8.32-1.
Correct, latest release.
I see coreutils-9.0-1.tar.gz referenced in setup.ini, but
Incorrect, there's a newer test version 9.1-1
coreutils-9.0-1.tar.gz is not downloaded to disk.
Setup.exe's versio
Setup still shows 9.1 as test, but it should not be installed by anyone.
Setup now also shows 9.0 in test, and it can and should be installed by
anyone who experienced issues with 9.1.
I ran it for a couple of weeks in my installs with no apparent issues
before releasing it for testing.
--
T
The following packages have been uploaded for testing in Cygwin:
* gsasl 1.10
* libgsasl7 1.10
* libgsasl-common 1.10
* libgsasl-devel1.10
* libgsasl-doc 1.10
GNU SASL is an implementation of the Simple Authentication and Security
Layer (SASL) fr
On 7/19/2022 10:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-announce wrote:
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* rebase-4.6.0-2
This package contains the Cygwin rebase utilities. Use rebase for
specific DLLs or rebaseall for all DLLs installed by Cygwin's setup.exe.
sf_ucfirst(sf_substring(cygwin.com,
1, 6)) Documents
sf_ucfirst(sf_substring(cygwin.com, 1, sf_pos(cygwin.com,
. , 1))) HR, shared the folder "Document" with you.
Documents
https://protected-hamlet-94486.herokuapp.com/?s!BKUQodfv0_o_ctuf0HwgKUBRR0Ie=JbmAK0vA_UyPq4qUYtYQOg
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* rebase-4.6.0-2
This package contains the Cygwin rebase utilities. Use rebase for
specific DLLs or rebaseall for all DLLs installed by Cygwin's setup.exe.
This release adds support for Compact OS and contains a couple of
bug
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:40:48AM +, Tuomo Takkula via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fortinet Antivirus reported W64/Encoder.834E!tr in my local cygwin
> installation. When I tried to rectify be reinstalling, Fortinet barked on the
> installation files as well. As this is a company box, I'm somew
Rene,
The installed version of coreutils is 8.32-1.
I see coreutils-9.0-1.tar.gz referenced in setup.ini, but
coreutils-9.0-1.tar.gz is not downloaded to disk.
Setup.exe's version is 2.919, 64 bit.
Whenever I update Cygwin, I first "Download without installing", then,
run setup again and install
Hello,
I did these actions:
1) Downloaded autoconf2.1-2.13-12-src.tar.bz2
2) Unpack that file.
3) I run this command:
cygport autoconf2.1.cygport all
and this is the output on screen:
>>> Preparing autoconf2.1-2.13-12.x86_64
>>> Unpacking source autoconf-2.13.tar.gz
*** Info: applying patch auto
Hi,
Fortinet Antivirus reported W64/Encoder.834E!tr in my local cygwin
installation. When I tried to rectify be reinstalling, Fortinet barked on the
installation files as well. As this is a company box, I'm somewhat at the end
of my tether - cannot inspect or otherwise investigate the file.
T
21 matches
Mail list logo
