Re: Searching how to replace dosfilewarning functionality

2020-01-29 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Denis Excoffier! > I do this: > 1) I replace "bool dos_file_warning;" with "bool dos_file_warning = > true;", and recompile cygwin1.dll. This has to be done at a regular basis, at > each new version or snapshot. > 2) In my .cshrc i install "echo \\ /nonexistent*" (or something more >

Re: Searching how to replace dosfilewarning functionality

2020-01-29 Thread ASSI
Denis Excoffier writes: > Is there any alternative to this almost-functionality if this code is removed? /usr/bin/kill -1 Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ DIY Stuff: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/DIY.html -- Problem reports: http://cygw

Re: rsync and ls -lR slow for directories with many files

2020-01-29 Thread L A Walsh
On 2020/01/08 08:43, Frank-Ulrich Sommer wrote: but rsync did not get faster. I'm sorry to admit that the ultimate solution does not use Cygwin any more. I'm now using a Windows share and connect to that share from my Linux server with cifs and autofs. rsync then runs on the linux machine and

RE: git on mounted CIFS is it Git or Cygwin

2020-01-29 Thread Jason Pyeron
I have added the ll and lsacl output. Note the lsacl died on the mounted folder, but was fine on /tmp/ > -Original Message- > From: Jason Pyeron > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 5:57 PM > To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com' > Subject: RE: git on mounted CIFS is it Git or Cygwin > > > -Origina

Re: Strange behavior of Python Package Index

2020-01-29 Thread airplanemath via cygwin
> I have selected python38-tkinter package for the Cygwin setup. > Tkinter is available when I start python3.8, but when I try to check list of > packages installed with pip3.8, > tkinter is not listed. > It seems that all packages selected from Cygwin setup are missing. > Only packages installe

Re: git on mounted CIFS is it Git or Cygwin

2020-01-29 Thread L A Walsh
On 2020/01/28 14:56, Jason Pyeron wrote: Two short details, ll is an alias commonly used on unix/linux/cygwin most often standing for "ls -l" in its simplest form. Mine does a few other things alias llg='ls -l' #long listing alias ll='llg -gG'# same with user+group turned o

Re: cygrunsrv does not start cygsshd at boot

2020-01-29 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2020-01-29 11:55, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote: >> Don't see where you read that? > > The service control manager waits until the service stops or the specified > preshutdown time-out value expires (this value can be set with the > ChangeServiceConfig2 function). This

Searching how to replace dosfilewarning functionality

2020-01-29 Thread Denis Excoffier
Hello, I see (https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2020-q1/msg00042.html) that the Cygwin code that handles the dos_file_warning option will be removed soon. I use this option. I don’t use it directly (for DOS paths) but as a signal to be sure that no Cygwin process remains present on my system. Th

Re: cygrunsrv does not start cygsshd at boot

2020-01-29 Thread Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin
> Don't see where you read that? The service control manager waits until the service stops or the specified preshutdown time-out value expires (this value can be set with the ChangeServiceConfig2 function). This control code should be used only in special circumstances, because a service that h

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 30 01:08, Takashi Yano wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:34:28 +0100 > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jan 29 16:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Jan 29 22:46, Takashi Yano wrote: > > > > --- m4/fseeko.m4.orig 2020-01-29 21:39:37.280507900 +0900 > > > > +++ m4/fseeko.m42020-01-29

Re: Fwd: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Marco Atzeri
Am 29.01.2020 um 16:39 schrieb Hans-Bernhard Bröker: [Ooops, sent this to Takashi instead of the list, originally.] Am 29.01.2020 um 14:46 schrieb Takashi Yano: On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:19:11 +0100 Marco Atzeri wrote: As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing a d

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Takashi Yano
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:34:28 +0100 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 29 16:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jan 29 22:46, Takashi Yano wrote: > > > --- m4/fseeko.m4.orig 2020-01-29 21:39:37.280507900 +0900 > > > +++ m4/fseeko.m42020-01-29 21:36:29.263747100 +0900 > > > @@ -30,16 +30,19 @

Fwd: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Hans-Bernhard Bröker
[Ooops, sent this to Takashi instead of the list, originally.] Am 29.01.2020 um 14:46 schrieb Takashi Yano: On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:19:11 +0100 Marco Atzeri wrote: As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 29 16:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 29 22:46, Takashi Yano wrote: > > --- m4/fseeko.m4.orig 2020-01-29 21:39:37.280507900 +0900 > > +++ m4/fseeko.m42020-01-29 21:36:29.263747100 +0900 > > @@ -30,16 +30,19 @@ > > HAVE_FSEEKO=0 > >else > > if test $WINDOWS_64_BIT

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 29 22:46, Takashi Yano wrote: > Hi Marco, > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:19:11 +0100 > Marco Atzeri wrote: > > As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing > > a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may be exposing > > a latent bug or race. > > > > Unf

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Takashi Yano
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:46:53 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:19:11 +0100 > Marco Atzeri wrote: > > As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing > > a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may be exposing > > a latent bug or race. > > > >

3270 Emulator

2020-01-29 Thread Wesley Doyle
Hi , Would you be interested to reach decision makers using 3270 emulator,5250 emulator,6530 emulator, as 400 emulator, Attachmate, Citrix, ProComm, IBM 3174,3151,3270,3274,3278,4840,Client access, Iseries, Linux 5250 RDP, Mainframes, Mocha soft, Thin Client, Rumba, Telnet, Unix Emulator, WYSE 50,

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Takashi Yano
Hi Marco, On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:19:11 +0100 Marco Atzeri wrote: > As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing > a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may be exposing > a latent bug or race. > > Unfortunately my old build tree was polluted by mistake, s

Re: cin and read(*,*) not waiting for kbd input in gdb

2020-01-29 Thread Jon Turney
On 28/01/2020 15:40, Rockefeller, Harry wrote: Since you and I appear to be the only ones interested in this particular problem I brought this off the Cygwin list, at least for now. Please don't do this. https://cygwin.com/problems.html#personal-email You are correct, and I am able to repro

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Marco Atzeri
Am 29.01.2020 um 10:44 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: On Jan 28 07:41, Marco Atzeri wrote: Am 27.01.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Takashi Yano: On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:45:08 +0100 Marco Atzeri wrote: Can you and Takashi provide me your cygcheck.out so that I can look on possible difference that could influe

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

2020-01-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 28 07:41, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Am 27.01.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Takashi Yano: > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:45:08 +0100 > > Marco Atzeri wrote: > > > Can you and Takashi provide me your cygcheck.out so that I can look on > > > possible difference that could influence the build behaviour. > > >