Hi Corinna,
Am 24.03.2019 um 19:19 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Mar 24 16:57, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Hi Achim,
Am 16.03.2019 um 15:00 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Thomas Wolff writes:
I have uploaded mintty 2.9.9 with the following changes:
While you're at it, could you please stop using the release n
Greetings, Thomas Wolff!
> Am 16.03.2019 um 15:00 schrieb Achim Gratz:
>> Thomas Wolff writes:
>>> I have uploaded mintty 2.9.9 with the following changes:
>> While you're at it, could you please stop using the release number "0" for
>> your packages?
> I had previously explained why I used to li
The following Perl distributions have been updated to their latest
version on CPAN, respectively:
x86/x86_64
--
perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS-4.10-1
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-1.12-1
perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.39-1
noarch
--
perl-libwww-perl-6.37-1
perl-LWP-MediaTypes-6.04-1
perl-Mojolicious-8.13-1
perl-Net-DN
Brian Inglis writes:
> System processes with more recent process start times seem to make process
> times
> available to unelevated processes.
> Do startup system processes not have this info available to unelevated
> processes
> because of some security policy, timing, or possible race condition
On 2019-03-24 12:15, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
>> Boot time is neither magic nor pulled out of thin air.
> No, but other than a lower limit of the process start time it has no
> correlation whatsoever to the start time of a process that I am not
> proviledged to get the start time f
On Mar 24 16:57, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Hi Achim,
>
> Am 16.03.2019 um 15:00 schrieb Achim Gratz:
> > Thomas Wolff writes:
> > > I have uploaded mintty 2.9.9 with the following changes:
> > While you're at it, could you please stop using the release number "0" for
> > your packages?
> I had previo
Brian Inglis writes:
> Boot time is neither magic nor pulled out of thin air.
No, but other than a lower limit of the process start time it has no
correlation whatsoever to the start time of a process that I am not
proviledged to get the start time from.
> Checking *my* system processes using wmi
On 2019-03-24 09:57, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 16.03.2019 um 15:00 schrieb Achim Gratz:
>> Thomas Wolff writes:
>>> I have uploaded mintty 2.9.9 with the following changes:
>> While you're at it, could you please stop using the release number "0" for
>> your packages?
> I had previously explained wh
On 2019-03-24 02:18, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
>> Are there non-startup system processes for which boot time is misleading?
>> If you need the truth use wmic, procexp64, or run ps in an elevated shell.
>
> I don't seem to get my point across. I'm fine with getting no start
> time
Hi Achim,
Am 16.03.2019 um 15:00 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Thomas Wolff writes:
I have uploaded mintty 2.9.9 with the following changes:
While you're at it, could you please stop using the release number "0" for your
packages?
I had previously explained why I used to like this (native package, no
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 15:00:54, Achim Gratz wrote:
Thomas Wolff writes:
I have uploaded mintty 2.9.9 with the following changes:
While you're at it, could you please stop using the release number "0"
for your packages? That's supposed to be used for test packages only
(if you want to make an ef
11 matches
Mail list logo
