- Original Message -
> From: Mark Geisert
> To: cygwin
> Date: 2019/3/12, Tue 13:20
> Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4)
>
>T atsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>
>>> From: Mark Geisert
>>> To: cygwin
>>> Cc:
>>> Date: 2019/
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Geisert
To: cygwin
Cc:
Date: 2019/3/11, Mon 16:21
Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4)
T atsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yaakov Selkowitz
> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 07
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 11 00:21, Mark Geisert wrote:
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
[...]
without the above patch ()
qt_safe_socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, O_NONBLOCK)))
gnuplot cannot connect with gnuplot_qt.
with the above patch ()
qt_safe_socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0))
gnuplot can conne
screen 4.6.2-2 is now available in Cygwin. This is a Cygwin-only release that
fixes a long-standing problem: screen -ls and screen -Q would hang in Cygwin.
They both work now. See the discussion at
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2019-03/msg00140.html.
And a GOLD STAR each to Corinna and Takashi for f
On 2019-03-11 15:39, Adrian Blakey wrote:
> Any ideas why the 64 bit setup program fails to run at all on my corporate
> Windows 10 laptop, whereas the 32 setup runs fine?
>
> The symptoms are whenever I run it either from the finder or from the
> command line it does not initialize or produce any
Greetings, Bill Stewart!
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:38 PM Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Try it with a group that has several hundred members. Then try with
>> several hundreds of such groups. Then try it again over a DSL line or
>> some VPN routing you across the globe that has a roundtrip measured i
Greetings, Achim Gratz!
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> (*) That doesn't mean it's not possible. In theory all Cygwin
>> processes could be opened to allow everyone
>> PROCESS_QUERY_LIMITED_INFORMATION access, which would at least
>> fill most of /proc//stat for foreign processes.
>>
Greetings, Archie Cobbs!
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brian Inglis
>> On 2019-03-11 07:43, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
>> > Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this security
>> > hole?
>> >> There are apparently
On 3/11/19, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2019-03-11 07:43, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
>> > Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this
>> > security hole?
>> >> There are
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brian Inglis
wrote:
> On 2019-03-11 07:43, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this security
> > hole?
> >> There are apparently reasons not to force this
Adrian Blakey writes:
> Any ideas why the 64 bit setup program fails to run at all on my corporate
> Windows 10 laptop, whereas the 32 setup runs fine?
One is whitelisted in whatever "protection" solution you are forced to
use and the other not. Ask whoever is the vendor or your support to
check
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:38 PM Achim Gratz wrote:
> Try it with a group that has several hundred members. Then try with
> several hundreds of such groups. Then try it again over a DSL line or
> some VPN routing you across the globe that has a roundtrip measured in
> tenths of seconds.
Underst
Lloyd Wood via cygwin writes:
> shouldn't the netpbm package be a necessary dependency for
> the xfig package, to prevent 'bad gif format' messages
> and much headscratching?
>
> $ Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion
> /bin/sh: giftopnm: command not found
> /bin/sh: ppmtopcx:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> (*) That doesn't mean it's not possible. In theory all Cygwin
> processes could be opened to allow everyone
> PROCESS_QUERY_LIMITED_INFORMATION access, which would at least
> fill most of /proc//stat for foreign processes.
> However, we never did that, so
Any ideas why the 64 bit setup program fails to run at all on my corporate
Windows 10 laptop, whereas the 32 setup runs fine?
The symptoms are whenever I run it either from the finder or from the
command line it does not initialize or produce any output.
The machine is modern Lenovo Thinkpad that
Bill Stewart writes:
> FWIW, not sure if you're using the IADsNameTranslate interface (
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/iads/nn-iads-iadsnametranslate).
[…]
> Init depends on a available AD server (GC in this example), of course, but
> seems pretty fast in my tests.
Try it w
On Mar 11 21:41, Achim Gratz wrote:
> jwang writes:
> > This is used to work for a ordinary login.
> >
> > After re-install, top does not show the true load et al. Nor processes
> > owned by SYSTEM.
> >
> > Please shed some light.
>
> Cygwin is a user-space layer. It can't show you information t
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:39 AM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Since windows seems to adhere to the rule:
> > "Case preserving", but "case ignoring", what does it
> > mean to make sure all user and group names are
> > case-correct?
>
> This all started here:
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2019-02/ms
jwang writes:
> This is used to work for a ordinary login.
>
> After re-install, top does not show the true load et al. Nor processes
> owned by SYSTEM.
>
> Please shed some light.
Cygwin is a user-space layer. It can't show you information that the
underlying OS determines to be off-limits for
On 3/11/2019 9:50 AM, jwang wrote:
> This is used to work for a ordinary login.
>
> After re-install, top does not show the true load et al. Nor processes
> owned by SYSTEM.
>
> Please shed some light. Thanks a lot in advance.
>
You mean this:
top - 13:26:15 up 1 day, 16:13, 1 user, load av
On 3/11/2019 6:43 AM, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Brian Inglis
> wrote:
>
> Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this security
> hole?
>
>> There are apparently reasons not to force this redirect as it can also cause
>> a
>
On 2019-03-11 07:43, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
> Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this security
> hole?
>> There are apparently reasons not to force this redirect as it can also cause
>> a
>> security hole.
> That's
On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 16:39 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 8 23:44, Peter Kozich (UM) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 23:21 +0100, Peter Kozich (UM) wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I tested this:
> > >
> > > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/x
This is used to work for a ordinary login.
After re-install, top does not show the true load et al. Nor processes
owned by SYSTEM.
Please shed some light.
Thanks a lot in advance
--
Sent from: http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/Cygwin-list-f3.html
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.co
I had also re-install (run setup again) rsync - still the same error :(
--
Sent from: http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/Cygwin-list-f3.html
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.ht
lundi 11 mars 2019
Alliance entre Daimler et BMW pour le développement de la voiture autonome (
http://newsletter.consonews.ma/index.php?subid=33983&option=com_acymailing&ctrl=url&urlid=4561&mailid=871
)
Les deux mastodontes de la construction automobile Daimler et BMW vont unir
leurs forces da
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Brian Inglis
wrote:
> >>> Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this security
> >>> hole?
>
> There are apparently reasons not to force this redirect as it can also cause a
> security hole.
That's really interesting. Can you provide more detail
On 3/11/2019 6:22 AM, L A Walsh wrote:
> On 3/10/2019 8:53 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
>> I guess so. Can you name any such client?
>>
---
Depends on the site, but for several months my browser would get
an error if I tried to goto my distro's website. They implemented
hsts, but were usi
On 3/10/2019 8:53 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 6:20 PM L A Walsh wrote:
>
It would be safer if http://www.cygwin.com always redirected you to
https://www.cygwin.com, where the page and the link are SSL.
Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close
On 2019-03-10 21:53, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 6:20 PM L A Walsh wrote:
It would be safer if http://www.cygwin.com always redirected you to
https://www.cygwin.com, where the page and the link are SSL.
Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this
On 3/10/2019 10:16 PM, Mark Geisert wrote:
> FWIW, I can reproduce the OP's STC using Chrome, Firefox, and Pale Moon. Not
> sure why it happens for some folks but not others. But since it does exist
> for
> some users, should it be dealt with?
>
---
Probably: https should be disabled on
Hey There,
In case if you plan to visit or any future RISC-V workshop, you should be aware
the basics of RISC-V and so here are the downloadable links for all short books
on RISC-V which we have published till date. The last book is a strategy on
VLSI Physical design implementation of 2 desi
I have tons of e-books on VLSI Physical design (with LIVE examples) and RISC-V
architecture to be uploaded and shared for FREE, but I guess you are facing
email address errors. Are you looking for some FREE interesting e-books to go
through? Subscribe using below link and the books will be dropp
On 2019-03-10 23:16, Mark Geisert wrote:
> On 2019-03-10, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2019-03-10 10:40, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>>> In any case, the problem I'm talking about is trivial to verify. Just
>>> start up Chrome or Firefox and enter http://www.cygwin.com. You can
>>> then confirm that (a) the p
On Mar 11 00:21, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > [...]
> > without the above patch ()
> > qt_safe_socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, O_NONBLOCK)))
> > gnuplot cannot connect with gnuplot_qt.
> >
> > with the above patch ()
> > qt_safe_socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0))
> > gnuplot can
lundi 11 mars 2019
(
http://newsletter.consonews.ma/index.php?subid=33983&option=com_acymailing&ctrl=url&urlid=4414&mailid=867
)
Inscription (
http://newsletter.consonews.ma/index.php?subid=33983&option=com_acymailing&ctrl=url&urlid=4414&mailid=867
)
Cet émail a été envoyé à cygwin
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yaakov Selkowitz
> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 07:43 +0900, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > I ask alpply a patch the below which enables to use qt terminal
on gnuplot
> for Cygwin.
> > (cygQt5Network-5.dll is affected.)
> >
> > ---
a
37 matches
Mail list logo
