RE: sh -c and newline

2016-12-05 Thread Gluszczak, Glenn
Ah I never knew about ^. Thanks a lot for that tip. I'll try it out tomorrow. Yeah I work in the backup/data protection division here, From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] on behalf of Brian Inglis [brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca] Sen

Re: sh -c and newline

2016-12-05 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-12-05 14:11, Gluszczak, Glenn wrote: > On 2016-12-05 15:04, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2016-12-05 12:38, Gluszczak, Glenn wrote: >>> I can't seem to get sh -c to recognize newline. Tcsh -c works. >>> I'm using echo as an example but I'm actually trying to build a >>> here-document. >>> %%%s

Re: sh -c and newline

2016-12-05 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-12-05 12:38, Gluszczak, Glenn wrote: > I can't seem to get sh -c to recognize newline. Tcsh -c works. > I'm using echo as an example but I'm actually trying to build a > here-document. > %%%sh -c "echo \nhello" > nhello > %%%sh -c "echo \\nhello" > nhello > %%%sh -c "echo \\\nhello" > \n

sh -c and newline

2016-12-05 Thread Gluszczak, Glenn
I can't seem to get sh -c to recognize newline. Tcsh -c works. I'm using echo as an example but I'm actually trying to build a here-document. %%%sh -c "echo \nhello" nhello %%%sh -c "echo \\nhello" nhello %%%sh -c "echo \\\nhello" \nhello %%%tcsh -c "echo \nhello" nhello %%%tcsh -c "ech

Re: Installer names not meaningful enough

2016-12-05 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-12-05 10:36, Stephen Paul Carrier wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:37:41AM -0500, Ian Lambert wrote: >> On December 1, 2016 8:54:57 AM EST, cyg Simple wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/1/2016 8:25 AM, Vlado wrote: On 1.12.2016 13:51, Eliot Moss wrote: > I think that including the versio

Re: Installer names not meaningful enough

2016-12-05 Thread Eliot Moss
On 12/5/2016 1:25 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: Greetings, Stephen Paul Carrier! I don't mind renaming the file myself, but would really appreciate any way to know from the cygwin.com front page exactly which version of the setup-*.exe is on offer. (The current version of Cygwin DLL is useful, but n

Re: Installer names not meaningful enough

2016-12-05 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Stephen Paul Carrier! > I don't mind renaming the file myself, but would really appreciate any > way to know from the cygwin.com front page exactly which version of the > setup-*.exe is on offer. (The current version of Cygwin DLL is useful, > but not the same thing.) That may (will!)

Re: Installer names not meaningful enough

2016-12-05 Thread Stephen Paul Carrier
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:37:41AM -0500, Ian Lambert wrote: > On December 1, 2016 8:54:57 AM EST, cyg Simple wrote: > > > > > >On 12/1/2016 8:25 AM, Vlado wrote: > >> On 1.12.2016 13:51, Eliot Moss wrote: > >>> I think that including the version of the setup program could be > >helpful > >>> - I