Re: Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-08-31 13:28, Garber, Dave (GE Oil & Gas, Non-GE) wrote: On Aug 31 18:59, Garber, Dave (GE Oil & Gas, Non-GE) wrote: On Aug 31 20:22, Jacek Sowiński wrote: After updating to setup-x86_64.exe version 2.875 I can't use install paths longer than 15 chars and error is throwed: The install d

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Erik Soderquist
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:17 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > > In other words, don't trust a default Exactly! -- Erik -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://c

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-08-31 13:30, Achim Gratz wrote: Brian Inglis writes: On 2016-08-31 12:32, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vince Rice wrote: As the 84 year old guy who helps my 70 year old dad … H. Is one of you Benjamin Button? :) That's what I thought when I first read

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: setup.exe (Release 2.875)

2016-08-31 Thread Achim Gratz
Emily Jackson writes: > On 8/31/2016 10:43 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> A new version of Setup, release 2.875, has been uploaded to >> >> https://cygwin.com/setup-x86.exe (32 bit version) >> https://cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe (64 bit version) > > I have downloaded the 64 bit version tw

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: setup.exe (Release 2.875)

2016-08-31 Thread Emily Jackson
On 8/31/2016 10:43 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > A new version of Setup, release 2.875, has been uploaded to > > https://cygwin.com/setup-x86.exe (32 bit version) > https://cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe (64 bit version) I have downloaded the 64 bit version twice, and I keep getting the old

Re: pdftk cygwin 32-bit

2016-08-31 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 31/08/2016 22:19, Ivandro Sanches wrote: I would like to install pdftk but it seems it is not present anymore among the available packages from setup-x86.exe. If possible, could you please give me some hint on how to install pdftk on cygwin 32-bit? Thanks a lot pdftk has been removed as

pdftk cygwin 32-bit

2016-08-31 Thread Ivandro Sanches
I would like to install pdftk but it seems it is not present anymore among the available packages from setup-x86.exe. If possible, could you please give me some hint on how to install pdftk on cygwin 32-bit? Thanks a lot -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread cyg Simple
On 8/31/2016 11:23 AM, Erik Soderquist wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> So, the answer to your question is determined by what your locale thinks >> is the appropriate representation; and I have no control over whether >> Windows' locale defaults will match glibc's loc

Re: Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Jacek Sowiński
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:38:39 +0200 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > So what was your actual install path? E:\PortableApps\CygwinPortable64 It works if I cut it to E:\PortableApps It doesn't however if it is E:\PortableApps1 I'm on Windows 7 64bit and I've tried both versions of setup.exe (x86 and x86_6

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Achim Gratz
Brian Inglis writes: > On 2016-08-31 12:32, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vince Rice >> wrote: As the 84 year old guy who helps my 70 year old dad … >>> H. Is one of you Benjamin Button? :) >> That's what I thought when I first read this, but I re-read it a

Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Garber, Dave (GE Oil & Gas, Non-GE)
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On > Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:26 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: EXT: Re: Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 > update > > On Aug 31 18:59

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 31/08/2016 21:16, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2016-08-31 12:32, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vince Rice wrote: As the 84 year old guy who helps my 70 year old dad … H. Is one of you Benjamin Button? :) That's what I thought when I first read this, but I re-read

Re: Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 18:59, Garber, Dave (GE Oil & Gas, Non-GE) wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On > > Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen > > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:39 PM > > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > > Subject: EXT: Re: Can't use inst

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-08-31 12:32, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vince Rice wrote: As the 84 year old guy who helps my 70 year old dad … H. Is one of you Benjamin Button? :) That's what I thought when I first read this, but I re-read it a couple of times, it makes sense :-)

Re: Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-08-31 12:59, Garber, Dave (GE Oil & Gas, Non-GE) wrote: On Aug 31 20:22, Jacek Sowiński wrote: After updating to setup-x86_64.exe version 2.875 I can't use install paths longer than 15 chars and error is throwed: The install directory must be absolute, with both a drive letter and leadi

Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Garber, Dave (GE Oil & Gas, Non-GE)
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On > Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:39 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: EXT: Re: Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 > update > > On Aug 31 20:22,

Re: Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 20:22, Jacek Sowiński wrote: > After updating to setup-x86_64.exe version 2.875 I can't use install > paths longer than 15 chars and error is throwed: > > > The install directory must be absolute, with both a drive letter and > > leading slash, like C:\Cygwin So what was your actual ins

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Kenneth Wolcott
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vince Rice wrote: >> As the 84 year old guy who helps my 70 year old dad … > > H. Is one of you Benjamin Button? :) That's what I thought when I first read this, but I re-read it a couple of times, it makes sense :-) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.c

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Vince Rice
> As the 84 year old guy who helps my 70 year old dad … H. Is one of you Benjamin Button? :) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/

Can't use install-path longer than 15 chars after 2.875 update

2016-08-31 Thread Jacek Sowiński
After updating to setup-x86_64.exe version 2.875 I can't use install paths longer than 15 chars and error is throwed: > The install directory must be absolute, with both a drive letter and > leading slash, like C:\Cygwin Below are the contents of setup.log.full: > 2016/08/31 19:09:26 Starting cy

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] openssl 1.0.2h-1

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 11:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-08-31 06:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > We can't and we won't switch to OpenSSH 1.1.0 unless at least the first > > problems are ironed out. There were a lot of partially backward > > incompatible changes, one of them results in OpenSSH not worki

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 31 August 2016 at 12:28, Nirgendsdorf wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:58:45 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> I uploaded a new Cygwin release 2.6.0-1. >> >> Please note that this release won't work on Windows XP and Windows >> Server 2003 or 2003 R2. At least Windows Vista or Windows Server

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] openssl 1.0.2h-1

2016-08-31 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-08-31 06:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: We can't and we won't switch to OpenSSH 1.1.0 unless at least the first problems are ironed out. There were a lot of partially backward incompatible changes, one of them results in OpenSSH not working with OpenSSL 1.1.0 yet. So, for the time being, w

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Nirgendsdorf
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:58:45 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I uploaded a new Cygwin release 2.6.0-1. Please note that this release won't work on Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 or 2003 R2. At least Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008 are required. Well, there goes XP as another software

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 15:23, Schwarz, Konrad wrote: > > -Original Message- > > > > So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls > > > > - > > > l > > > > uses 24 hour times. > > > > > > > > $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.lst > > > > -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 mchn1350 Domain Users 263 Aug 31 13:14 >

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: setup.exe (Release 2.875)

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
A new version of Setup, release 2.875, has been uploaded to https://cygwin.com/setup-x86.exe (32 bit version) https://cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe (64 bit version) Changes compared to 2.874: - Layout changes in the chooser window header - Improved search field: You can now type as fast

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Erik Soderquist
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > So, the answer to your question is determined by what your locale thinks > is the appropriate representation; and I have no control over whether > Windows' locale defaults will match glibc's locale defaults for en_US or > any other locale outsid

RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
> -Original Message- > > > So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls > > > - > > l > > > uses 24 hour times. > > > > > > $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.lst > > > -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 mchn1350 Domain Users 263 Aug 31 13:14 > > > rtos_benchmark.lst* > > > $ date > > > Wed, Aug 31,

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2016-08-31 07:04, Frank Farance wrote: On 2016-08-31 08:09, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2016-08-31 13:41, Schwarz, Konrad was heard to say: Sorry for the previous incomplete mail. So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls -l uses 24 hour times. $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 09:36, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/31/2016 08:04 AM, Frank Farance wrote: > > On 2016-08-31 08:09, Markus Hoenicka wrote: > >> At 2016-08-31 13:41, Schwarz, Konrad was heard to say: > >>> Sorry for the previous incomplete mail. > >>> > >>> So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style d

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/31/2016 09:36 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Not necessarily. ls hardcodes its default representation for files > younger than 6 months to: > > "%b %e %H:%M" > > while date hardcodes its default representation to: > > nl_langinfo(_DATE_FMT) > Except that I just tested, and nl_langinfo(_DATE_F

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/31/2016 08:04 AM, Frank Farance wrote: > On 2016-08-31 08:09, Markus Hoenicka wrote: >> At 2016-08-31 13:41, Schwarz, Konrad was heard to say: >>> Sorry for the previous incomplete mail. >>> >>> So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls -l >>> uses 24 hour times. >>>

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 14:23, Schwarz, Konrad wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Schwarz, Konrad (CT RDA ITP SES-DE) > > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:51 PM > > To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com' > > Subject: RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1) > > > > > -Original Message-

RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
> -Original Message- > From: Schwarz, Konrad (CT RDA ITP SES-DE) > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:51 PM > To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com' > Subject: RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Schwarz, Konrad (CT RDA ITP SES-DE) > > Sen

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 2.6.0-1

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi folks, I uploaded a new Cygwin release 2.6.0-1. Please note that this release won't work on Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 or 2003 R2. At least Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008 are required. What's new: --- - Support for POSIX-1.2008 locale objects and per-thread locales.

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Frank Farance
On 2016-08-31 08:09, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2016-08-31 13:41, Schwarz, Konrad was heard to say: Sorry for the previous incomplete mail. So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls -l uses 24 hour times. $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.lst -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 mchn1350 Domain Users 2

Re: passwd unrecoverable error 1265

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 14:12, Vlado wrote: > On 31.8.2016 12:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I found a workaround: The Windows call for changing the password used > > by the passwd tool is > > > > ret = NetUserChangePassowrd (server, username, old_pwd, new_pwd); > > > > The server is usually the logon serv

Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 31/08/2016 14:09, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2016-08-31 13:41, Schwarz, Konrad was heard to say: Sorry for the previous incomplete mail. So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls -l uses 24 hour times. $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.lst -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 mchn1350 Domain Users 2

Re: passwd unrecoverable error 1265

2016-08-31 Thread Vlado
On 31.8.2016 12:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I found a workaround: The Windows call for changing the password used by the passwd tool is ret = NetUserChangePassowrd (server, username, old_pwd, new_pwd); The server is usually the logon server, prepended by double backslash, as in the variable

RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2016-08-31 13:41, Schwarz, Konrad was heard to say: Sorry for the previous incomplete mail. So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls -l uses 24 hour times. $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.lst -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 mchn1350 Domain Users 263 Aug 31 13:14 rtos_benchmark.lst* $ date

RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)

2016-08-31 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
Sorry for the previous incomplete mail. So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls -l uses 24 hour times. $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.lst -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 mchn1350 Domain Users 263 Aug 31 13:14 rtos_benchmark.lst* $ date Wed, Aug 31, 2016 1:39:35 PM $ echo $LC_TIME $ echo $LAN

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] openssl 1.0.2h-1

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 12:50, Gerrit Haase wrote: > 2016-05-04 19:35 GMT+02:00 Yaakov Selkowitz: > > > > The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: > > > > * openssl-1.0.2h-1 > > * openssl-devel-1.0.2h-1 > > * openssl-perl-1.0.2h-1 > > * libopenssl100-1.0.2h-1 > > * mingw64-i686-opens

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] openssl 1.0.2h-1

2016-08-31 Thread Gerrit Haase
2016-05-04 19:35 GMT+02:00 Yaakov Selkowitz: > > The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: > > * openssl-1.0.2h-1 > * openssl-devel-1.0.2h-1 > * openssl-perl-1.0.2h-1 > * libopenssl100-1.0.2h-1 > * mingw64-i686-openssl-1.0.2h-1 > * mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.0.2h-1 > > ...

Re: passwd unrecoverable error 1265

2016-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 30 20:20, Vlado wrote: > Hello. > > I have few users with sshd-only access to server. They use passwd when > changing passwords. > > passwd is not working anymore for regular user (remote connection with > PuTTy): > > test@server ~ > $ passwd > Old password: > New pas