On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
> wrote:
>> On 05/11/2016 08:14 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi;
>>>
>>>cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied
>>>
>>>I have several mounted partit
On 05/11/2016 08:14 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
Hi;
cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied
I have several mounted partitions on my Windows machine (64bit Windows 7).
Copying a file using cygwin cp , via mintty, from a mounted drive to
a local path, I frequently
Hi;
cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied
I have several mounted partitions on my Windows machine (64bit Windows 7).
Copying a file using cygwin cp , via mintty, from a mounted drive to
a local path, I frequently get the aforementioned message.
Is the partition
> While I'm always ready to reconsider previous decisions, this is how it
> appears to be handled in Linux distros. The implication thereof is that
> (once all packages have been adapted) the default /etc/shells should
> only contain those shells available by default (namely, sh, bash, and
> /
On 2016-05-11 12:09, Andrew Schulman wrote:
Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman:
Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in
base-files?
I seem to remember that this was discussed before. If you could perhaps
look up that discussion and fill me in what t
> Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman:
> > Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in
> > base-files?
>
> I seem to remember that this was discussed before. If you could perhaps
> look up that discussion and fill me in what the conclusion was last time
>
Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman:
Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in
base-files?
I seem to remember that this was discussed before. If you could perhaps
look up that discussion and fill me in what the conclusion was last time
around?
--
Ac
On May 11, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Mike Bonnet wrote:
>
> On 5/11/16 8:18 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote:
>>
>>> Any chance we could get a new 64-bit build?
>>
>> We'd need to find the real cause of this before it would be of any help.
>> I'd start with updating
On 5/11/16 8:18 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote:
I'm seeing segfaults with this version when recursively scanning large
directories. Running Cygwin x86_64 on Windows Server 2012.
But not with 0.99? Have you been able to reproduce this on any other
systems?
On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote:
I'm seeing segfaults with this version when recursively scanning large
directories. Running Cygwin x86_64 on Windows Server 2012.
But not with 0.99? Have you been able to reproduce this on any other
systems?
In the past
When?
this happened when s
On 3/30/16 10:08 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* clamav-0.99.1-1
* clamav-doc-0.99.1-1
* libclamav7-0.99.1-1
* libclamav-devel-0.99.1-1
* clamav-db-main-57-1
* clamav-db-daily-21477.253-1
Clam AntiVirus is a GPL anti-virus tool
11 matches
Mail list logo
