Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7

Corinna Vinschen writes: > What we *could* try to do is to tweak the actual SYSTEM and Admins ACE, > though. Rather than ignoring the CLASS_OBJ/ACL_MASK value completely > for them, we could apply the execute bit part only. Usually it doesn't > make sense for SYSTEM/Admins having execute perms if

Scintilla for QT5

Yaakov, any plan to have a Qt5 version as for Qt4 ? Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Documentation on fstab out of date

On 18. 4. 2015 19:21, Steven Penny wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:47 AM, David Macek wrote: >> According to has_exec_chars, the sniffing routine also looks for "MZ" (EXE/PE >> files) and ":\n" (batch files? (can anyone confirm this?)). > > Yeah, I can confirm that it does nothing. AFAIK `file

Re: Documentation on fstab out of date

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:47 AM, David Macek wrote: > According to has_exec_chars, the sniffing routine also looks for "MZ" (EXE/PE > files) and ":\n" (batch files? (can anyone confirm this?)). Yeah, I can confirm that it does nothing. $ touch alpha.sh bravo.sh charlie.bat delta.bat $ ec

Re: Running tasklist /m in cygwin hangs

Greetings, Marco Atzeri! I can confirm it still hangs for me with 1.7.35. I am using the 32 bit (i686) Cygwin which is the only difference from Andrey's. >> >>> on $ uname -vrsm >>> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW 1.7.35(0.287/5/3) 2015-03-04 12:07 i686 >> >>> It is only a bit slow (both mintty

Documentation on fstab out of date

Hi. It seems to me that is out of sync with actual Cygwin behaviour in few aspects. What's the established process on updating these docs? List of issues I found follows. > Recognized options are binary, text, nouser, user, exec, notexec

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7

On Apr 18 12:48, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Right. It's a compromise. I take it you don't like the extra behaviour > > for SYSTEM/Admins. Neither do I. Others are desperately waiting for > > more. The problem with compromises is, they are usually best if nobody > > is co

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7

Corinna Vinschen writes: > Right. It's a compromise. I take it you don't like the extra behaviour > for SYSTEM/Admins. Neither do I. Others are desperately waiting for > more. The problem with compromises is, they are usually best if nobody > is completely satisfied ;) I have argued against t

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7

On Apr 18 11:47, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > In theory, the access(2)/faccessat(2) functions should not rely at all > > on the new code. The reason is that they are implemented using the > > underlying OS function to evaluate ACLs. That means, they provide the > > actual acc

Re: issues seen in TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7

Hi random user (at least a first name would be nice, you know my first name as well, isn't it?), On Apr 17 22:58, random user wrote: > Hi again, Corinna. > > I appreciate these recent changes, the more complete Posix ACL support > looks beneficial for sharing/syncing files between Cygwin and Linu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7

Corinna Vinschen writes: >> -rw---+ 1 ASSI Kein 48880 5. Apr 2014 ucl.log >> # file: ucl.log >> # owner: ASSI >> # group: Kein >> user::rw- >> group::--- >> group:SYSTEM:rwx#effective:--- >> group:Administratoren:rwx #effective:--- >> mask:--- >> other:--

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7

Hi Achim, On Apr 17 22:09, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > New 2.0.0-0.7 test release: > > > > - Improved setfacl tool. It now handles mask recomputation just like > > the Linux tool. -d option renamed to -x (but -d is still accepted > > for backward compat). New -n,--no-m