Re: "su" command removed / coreutils-8.23-2

2014-09-11 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/11/2014 09:16 PM, Denis Mühle wrote: > Hello, > > today i've updated my cygwin and now i have a big problem. the "su" > command was removed. > > https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2014-08/msg00245.html > > > i need "su" to start my services as seperate user, > because i have a webinterface

Re: "su" command removed / coreutils-8.23-2

2014-09-11 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-09-11 22:16, Denis Mühle wrote: i need "su" to start my services as seperate user, because i have a webinterface to manage my services for both Linux and Windows and it needs the "su" command. - will the "su" command come back to cygwin? I don't know. The coreutils 'su' was removed

"su" command removed / coreutils-8.23-2

2014-09-11 Thread Denis Mühle
Hello, today i've updated my cygwin and now i have a big problem. the "su" command was removed. https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2014-08/msg00245.html i need "su" to start my services as seperate user, because i have a webinterface to manage my services for both Linux and Windows and it ne

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: dos2unix 7.0-1

2014-09-11 Thread Erwin Waterlander
CHANGES SINCE LAST RELEASE: === New upstream release. * New: automated self-tests. * New: option -u to keep UTF-16 encoding. * New: option -v to print information about BOMs and converted line breaks. * Change: stdio mode does not automatically set quiet mode.

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Ken Brown
On 9/11/2014 6:21 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Achim Gratz wrote: Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it from another font with the sam

RE: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread scotttinsley
Sorry for top posting. But that is Outlook in text mode. Changing directory to "sysnative" worked. I was able to access inetsrv/backup. Thanks for all the help. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http:

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mc-4.8.13-1

2014-09-11 Thread Marco Atzeri
Version mc-4.8.13-1 of Midnight Commander has been uploaded for cygwin CHANGES This is a upstream bugfix release https://www.midnight-commander.org/wiki/NEWS-4.8.13 DESCRIPTION GNU Midnight Commander is a visual file manager. It's a feature rich full-screen text mode application that allows yo

Re: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Larry Hall (Cygwin)! > On 09/11/2014 09:20 AM, scotttins...@ups.com wrote: >> On this server, there is no sysnative under Windows. From a Windows CMD >> shell, > 'sysnative' is only visible from 32-bit apps. It's not actually "visible". But you can access it. > See >

Re: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, scotttins...@ups.com! > Using the bash shell from a 32-bit Cygwin install on the server, I still see > no "sysnative" directory You will not see it. Ever. It's a virtual directory, only accessible if you directly try to access it. Means, you gotta know you can access it, to begin with

RE: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread scotttinsley
Using the bash shell from a 32-bit Cygwin install on the server, I still see no "sysnative" directory $ pwd /cygdrive/c/windows nrgo947@wdiisn03 /cygdrive/c/windows $ ls -lad Sy* sy* drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SYSTEM 0 Jul 14 2009 SysMsiCache drwxrwx---+ 1 TrustedInstaller Trust

Re: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 09/11/2014 09:20 AM, scotttins...@ups.com wrote: On this server, there is no sysnative under Windows. From a Windows CMD shell, 'sysnative' is only visible from 32-bit apps. See Specifically: 32-bit app

RE: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread scotttinsley
On this server, there is no sysnative under Windows. From a Windows CMD shell, c:\Windows>dir sy* Volume in drive C is Windows Volume Serial Number is 14F6-5475 Directory of c:\Windows 07/14/2009 01:37 AM SysMsiCache 07/13/2009 10:36 PM system 06/10/2009 05:08 PM

Re: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Andrey Repin! > Greetings, scotttins...@ups.com! >> C:\Windows\sysnative?? Are you referring to c:\Windows\SysWOW64? > Sysnative is a 32-bit redirection point to a C:\windows\syswow64 directory. Actually, that's in reverse. %SystemRoot%\Sysnative is a redirection to a REAL %SystemRoo

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Sebastien Vauban! >>> The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to >>> Emacs. >>> >>> But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same >>> range of characters in both worlds? >> >> You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular

Re: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, scotttins...@ups.com! > C:\Windows\sysnative?? Are you referring to c:\Windows\SysWOW64? Sysnative is a 32-bit redirection point to a C:\windows\syswow64 directory. > Using the Windows CMD shell or Cygwin bash shell, I do see there is a > C:\windows\syswow64\inetsrv directory. But it

RE: Windows 2008 access to inetsrv directory

2014-09-11 Thread scotttinsley
Yes, this is Cygwin running on a Windows 2008/R2, 64-bit server. C:\Windows\sysnative?? Are you referring to c:\Windows\SysWOW64? Using the Windows CMD shell or Cygwin bash shell, I do see there is a C:\windows\syswow64\inetsrv directory. But it does not contain, or list, the "backup" directo

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Achim Gratz wrote: > Sebastien Vauban writes: >> The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to >> Emacs. >> >> But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same >> range of characters in both worlds? > > You seem to assume that those fonts define that p

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Achim Gratz
Sebastien Vauban writes: > The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to > Emacs. > > But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same > range of characters in both worlds? You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph. Both fonts

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 10/09/2014 19:49, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can di

Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs

2014-09-11 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello, Ken Brown wrote: > On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: >> As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of >> Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing >> triangle coherently for the same fonts: >> >> - win32 Emacs always can display it, in