> If you can wait for the digest, you can simply open the selected message from
> the digest and reply to that, and it will be threaded.
Using Gmail, it doesn't seem to offer a way to see them as separate
mails or reply to a particular one, though. Oh, well...
> If you can't wait, then read the me
On Jul 17 08:33, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> On 2014-07-16 15:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > It occured to me that there's another way to do that. The problem
> > you're mentioning above could be alleviated if the first Cygwin process
> > in a process tree fetches all POSIX offsets of all trusted do
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 06:30:05AM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>> git isn't ready yet unfortunately. Can't you just download a recent
>> snapshot? That should be good enough.
>
>I can download and install snapshots just fine. I'm running snapshots
>for quite some time a
> From: Christopher Faylor
> There is no automated way to do that if you are using the digest. Digests
> are intended for casual perusal of the list, not for active communication.
FWIW, I get digest format, but still make threaded replies (such as this) with
a few extra steps that may not be obv
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:59:10PM -0400, sous lesquels wrote:
>Any suggestions? Or is this not as common use case as I think it is?
Craft your reply with the appropriate "In-Reply-To" header tag and it
will maintain threading.
There is no automated way to do that if you are using the digest. Di
Thanks Larry.
> This is not the recommended way of handling this situation. You end up
> with a ".new" extension if the DLL was in use at the time of your upgrade.
> In this case, setup*.exe schedules a replace of your existing DLL with the
> ".new" version on reboot. So if you find such a file
On 07/18/2014 10:48 AM, sous lesquels wrote:
It's not reproducible for me. I just tried your ssh scenario with a
1000 and 2000 line buffers and it works fine for me every time, be it
with Cygwin 1.7.30 or the latest snapshot. I also raised the number of
loops. Is it possible that you're suffer
> It's not reproducible for me. I just tried your ssh scenario with a
> 1000 and 2000 line buffers and it works fine for me every time, be it
> with Cygwin 1.7.30 or the latest snapshot. I also raised the number of
> loops. Is it possible that you're suffering a BLODA(*) problem?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
On Jul 18 05:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/18/2014 02:29 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Bug Fixes
> > -
> >
> > - Fix various assorted bugs (potential buffer overruns, resource leaks, you
> > name it) catched by Coverity.
>
> s/catched/caught/
Thanks for catching ;)
Corinna
--
On 07/18/2014 02:29 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Bug Fixes
> -
>
> - Fix various assorted bugs (potential buffer overruns, resource leaks, you
> name it) catched by Coverity.
s/catched/caught/
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http:/
Hi folks,
we're planning to release Cygwin 1.7.31 in the next few days. Last
chance to give the developer snapshot a try. Please test the latest
snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/, dated 2014-07-16.
This is mostly a bugfix release. Here's the list of changes:
What changed:
-
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> That was intended. Sorry for not telling!
No problem, I'll just stick with the previous one for now.
> It's the snapshot which is supposed to become 1.7.31. I'm not yet
> confident enough to activate the AD integration stuff into the official
> release an
On Jul 18 10:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 17 22:29, D. Boland wrote:
> > Yes, I read it. I just don't like to swap my current Cygwin DLL. I will
> > test it
> > proper on a fresh Cygwin system on another computer. When will the fix be
> > released?
>
> With 1.7.31 in the next few days.
On Jul 18 07:55, Achim Gratz wrote:
> It appears this snapshot does not contain the LDAP integration or has it
> switched off, is this intended? The snapshot from the day before is OK.
That was intended. Sorry for not telling!
It's the snapshot which is supposed to become 1.7.31. I'm not yet
c
Hi Daniel,
On Jul 17 22:29, D. Boland wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 17 20:14, D. Boland wrote:
> > > Just letting you know how it went with the Resolver (miniedit). The
> > > error, pointed
> > > out by you, solved the problem.
> >
> > Did you read my previous
It appears this snapshot does not contain the LDAP integration or has it
switched off, is this intended? The snapshot from the day before is OK.
Regards,
Achim.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http:/
16 matches
Mail list logo
