Those who buy a new high definition set may not be ready to give up that
metal contraption on the roof or are willing to have cable or satellite
installed. As such they will be somewhat disappointed in the quality of the
picture, especially if they were not informed that an analog signal going to
a
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:14:09AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Aug 4 23:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 11:11:13PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> >However, I won't be able to investigate further for at least a
>> >week...and will have only intermittent internet ac
On 8/5/2013 1:30 AM, Martin Baute wrote:
Am 31.07.2013 13:23, schrieb Martin Baute:
Hi there,
I've mailed this to cygwin-ports-general on 2013-01-23, and
got it confirmed, but today realized this bug does still
persist. Since I now know that libpango is part of the basic
Cygwin package, I'll re
On 05/08/2013 11:00 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/3/2013 3:05 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 02/08/2013 8:07 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 02/08/2013 7:04 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/2/2013 4:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 1 22:46, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Here's a new one... I started a compilation,
On 8/3/2013 3:05 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 02/08/2013 8:07 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 02/08/2013 7:04 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 8/2/2013 4:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 1 22:46, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Here's a new one... I started a compilation, but before it actually
invoked the command
Thanks Charles and all. I found the problem and checkX works.
I erroneously was using checkX argument
whereas checkX uses checkX [options] and the -d option required the
arg.
My attempts to use DISPLAY and explicit checkX 127.0,0.1:0 failed. It might
be nice
for check
Hello!
> The errors i obtain are as follows:
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 2:
> use: command not found
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 3:
> use: command not found
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/
On Aug 4 23:37, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 11:11:13PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >However, I won't be able to investigate further for at least a
> >week...and will have only intermittent internet access until then.
>
> So that may be as many as *two* Thursdays then.
On Aug 4 13:08, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 3 19:42, Linda Walsh wrote:
> >>Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >>>This is the output for L: drive, which is not a physical but logical
> >>>volume formatted EXFAT. Hopefully it doesn't alter the
> >>>characteristics/attributes. With a
9 matches
Mail list logo
