Re: Promote sqlite 3.7.13-1 from test status?

2013-03-01 Thread Achim Gratz
Warren Young writes: > I never have run the SQLite tests. I see, thanks for letting me know. That adds another unknown in that investigation, unfortunately. > At this point, I'm about to give up on it and ship an updated version > of my latetst test packages. That is, with FTS and such features

Re: Promote sqlite 3.7.13-1 from test status?

2013-03-01 Thread Warren Young
On 3/1/2013 08:11, Achim Gratz wrote: how'd you work around the reams of errors in compiling the testfixture (if you had to do anything)? I never have run the SQLite tests. The reason I brought it up is that it could possibly provide a counterargument against the "svn + bdb breaks" report.

Re: startxwin started bash does not read .bashrc or .bash_profile

2013-03-01 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Chris J. Breisch! > On 3/1/2013 10:49 AM, Kevin Layer wrote: >> >> Don't have cron running. I start it as me, the logged in user, from a >> mouse click or running "startxwin" in a mintty. Behaves the same >> either way. > Well, I am unable to duplicate this no matter what I do. I hav

Re: startxwin started bash does not read .bashrc or .bash_profile

2013-03-01 Thread Chris J. Breisch
On 3/1/2013 10:49 AM, Kevin Layer wrote: Don't have cron running. I start it as me, the logged in user, from a mouse click or running "startxwin" in a mintty. Behaves the same either way. Well, I am unable to duplicate this no matter what I do. I have even launched a dash shell directly fro

Re: startxwin started bash does not read .bashrc or .bash_profile

2013-03-01 Thread Kevin Layer
Earnie Boyd wrote: >> >>> Then what is the value of $SHELL? >> > >> > /bin/bash >> >> What user actually starts the session? I've seen this type of thing >> when the cron daemon starts a session. The profile files are never >> read. Don't have cron running. I start it as me, the logged in use

Re: Promote sqlite 3.7.13-1 from test status?

2013-03-01 Thread Achim Gratz
Hi Warren, Warren Young etr-usa.com> writes: > 4. Profit! Still not sure about that... If I check out the 3.7.15.2 version and just configure / make, I'll get a seemingly working sqlite3.exe, but I can't compile the testfixture. How do you configure the build on Cygwin and how'd you work aroun

Re: Can't install Win32::OLE in Perl 5.14

2013-03-01 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 3/1/2013 1:23 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: I got these errors when I tried to run cygcheck. I've never seen them before: Run from an elevated terminal if you don't want to get these errors. -- Larry _ A: Yes. > Q: Are you

Re: startxwin started bash does not read .bashrc or .bash_profile

2013-03-01 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Layer wrote: > Earnie Boyd wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Kevin Layer wrote: >>> > >>> > Did you read the original report and all the replies in the chain? >>> > >>> >...it requires my .bashrc to be sourced (.bash_profile merely sources >>>

Re: broken links in commit messages? (Re: src/winsup/cygserver ChangeLog.64bit)

2013-03-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 1 12:20, Václav Zeman wrote: > On 1 March 2013 11:39, wrote: > > CVSROOT:/cvs/src > > Module name:src > > Branch: cygwin-64bit-branch > > Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2013-03-01 10:39:51 > > > > Modified files: > > winsup/cygserver: ChangeLog.64bit >

broken links in commit messages? (Re: src/winsup/cygserver ChangeLog.64bit)

2013-03-01 Thread Václav Zeman
On 1 March 2013 11:39, wrote: > CVSROOT:/cvs/src > Module name:src > Branch: cygwin-64bit-branch > Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2013-03-01 10:39:51 > > Modified files: > winsup/cygserver: ChangeLog.64bit > > Log message: > * client.cc: Revert changes

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc4-4.7.2-1 (experimental)

2013-03-01 Thread JonY
Version 4.7.2-1 of "gcc4" has been uploaded. I have just uploaded an updated GCC-4 package to cygwin.com. It will be arriving at your favourite mirror next time it synchronizes itself with the official Cygwin repository. This is an experimental release of gcc 4.7.2, it is not expected to be bug f