2012-10-03 16:23 "Dr. Volker Zell" :
| > Homepage: http://freecode.com/projects/sendxmpp
|
| Jari, I think the consensus for perl packages is to not provide the
| perllocal.pod
Fixed.
Thanks,
Jari
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwi
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
--- SNIPPET ---
> >
> > I can reproduce this as well. I also found the patch which introduced
> > the problem, but it's not clear yet, why. Stay tuned.
>
> I've just applied a patch to fix this problem. It seems
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:46:17PM -0400, bob wrote:
>The astute reader might be asking why RDWR and not RDONLY.
This astute reader is asking why you are starting a new thread every
time. Please stick to one.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: h
Forgot to mention in my last code snip post that the Linux code below is the
"desired" behavior of the fifos to match the existing Linux code in the SIMPL
toolkit.
In this Linux code snip we open the receive end of the fifo as RDWR (without
the O_NONBLOCK flag) and Linux conveniently allow
Hi
New versions of 'libtasn1/libtasn1_3/libtasn1-devel' have been uploaded to a
server near you.
o Update to latest upstream release
o Build for cygwin 1.7.16 with gcc-4.5.3
libtasn1 NEWS:
===
o Added asn1_read_node_value() to obtain a node's value.
This is to deprecate the
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> This suggest that you're looking into wrong direction, and real culprit is
> something you didn't caught yet.
> Try HijackThis http://sourceforge.net/projects/hjt/ to see if there's any
> suspicious handlers installed in your system.
> Or you m
>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Brian Alexander wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have any other ideas of how to make a shortcut to a SMB path
that
>> will work in both Windows XP and Windows 7, and is also traversable by
>> cygwin?
>>
>
>I'm not familiar with CYGWIN=winsymlink to understand what it does; I
>c
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
>>
>> That did it. Placed the executable in /bin, and it ran as expected.
>>
>
> You should not move /usr/sbin files to /bin. You should use
> /usr/sbin/BINARY or add /usr/sbin to the PATH var
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Brian Alexander wrote:
>
> Anyone have any other ideas of how to make a shortcut to a SMB path that
> will work in both Windows XP and Windows 7, and is also traversable by
> cygwin?
>
I'm not familiar with CYGWIN=winsymlink to understand what it does; I
can guess b
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
>
> That did it. Placed the executable in /bin, and it ran as expected.
>
You should not move /usr/sbin files to /bin. You should use
/usr/sbin/BINARY or add /usr/sbin to the PATH variable. You'll get
confused when an update seemingly replaces
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
wrote:
> On 10/3/2012 8:26 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
>
>
> Try /usr/sbin/hdparm.exe. /usr/sbin is not in your path by default.
>
> --
> Larry
>
> _
>
> A: Yes.
>> Q: Are you sure?
On 3 October 2012 09:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> Would it be possible to have lftp updated to the latest release to
>> capture the bittorrent enhancements added?
>
> Sure. If everything goes smoothly, I should be able to get an update out in a
> day or so.
I see the RFU on the apps list, thank
On 04/10/2012 01:05, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Well it has to use something to validate the package. The data it
uses is the list of files in the .lst.gz file you deleted. So it
can't do allot of validating without that metadata.
Indeed.
But I suppose it would make sense to not return "OK" i
13 matches
Mail list logo
