Re: cygport debug junk

2012-07-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-18 20:26, Ken Brown wrote: On 7/18/2012 6:53 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: But again, while I can't state this as policy, you really shouldn't be disabling debuginfo on a widespread or permanent basis. It's a feature and it's there for a reason. I disabled it for my recent texlive r

Can't resolve "Your group is currently "mkpasswd"'

2012-07-18 Thread cygwin
I just tried to set up cygwin on my new corporate pc (I have admin privileges on the machine but not on the overall corporate network). I keep getting the infamous 'Your group is currently "mkpasswd"' every time I open a new terminal. Since this is a domain, I first tried "mpasswd -l -d >| /etc/p

Re: Built perl 5.6.2 on Cygwin 1.7.11, but get SIGABRT from resulting perl.exe

2012-07-18 Thread jojelino
On 2012-07-19 AM 2:45, Nicholas DiPiazza wrote: Jojelino asked: "What was the result of gdb --args perl symbol cygwin1.dll define btc bt c end # "Function "_sigfe_free" not defined." shouldn't be seen. if it does, please use latest snapshot including debug

Re: cygport debug junk

2012-07-18 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/18/2012 6:53 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Bzzzt. Don't use internal structures. If it's not documented in the manual, you shouldn't be using it in your .cygport, and anything starting with an underscore is purely internal. Sorry, I didn't realize that. But again, while I can't state th

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.566-1

2012-07-18 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2012-07-08, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > The following packages have been updated for the Cygwin distribution: > > *** vim-7.3.566-1 > *** vim-common-7.3.566-1 > *** xxd-7.3.566-1 > *** gvim-7.3.566-1 > > Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the > de-facto Unix edito

Re: cygport debug junk

2012-07-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-18 17:07, Ken Brown wrote: On 7/18/2012 4:57 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote: My cygport is 0.10.11-1. I haven't run cygport in a while, and now I'm trying to compile a new package. When I do, by default it seems that I get CC = "gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/ASchulma/d

[ANNOUNCEMENT] New packages: mosh, protobuf, perl-Io-Tty

2012-07-18 Thread Reini Urban
mosh has been uploaded to cygwin. The mosh people are now happy to point their windows folks over here. Oh my :) See http://mosh.mit.edu/ "New remote terminal application that allows roaming, supports intermittent connectivity, and provides intelligent local echo and line editing of user keystroke

Re: cygport debug junk

2012-07-18 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/18/2012 4:57 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote: My cygport is 0.10.11-1. I haven't run cygport in a while, and now I'm trying to compile a new package. When I do, by default it seems that I get CC = "gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/ASchulma/dev/cygwin/wbox/wbox-5-1/build=/usr/src/

cygport debug junk

2012-07-18 Thread Andrew Schulman
My cygport is 0.10.11-1. I haven't run cygport in a while, and now I'm trying to compile a new package. When I do, by default it seems that I get CC = "gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/ASchulma/dev/cygwin/wbox/wbox-5-1/build=/usr/src/debug/wbox-5-1\ -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/ASchul

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: dejagnu-1.5-1

2012-07-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
The following package has been updated for the Cygwin distribution: *** dejagnu-1.5-1 DejaGnu is a framework for testing other programs. Its purpose is to provide a single front end for all tests. Think of it as a custom library of Tcl procedures crafted to support writing a test harness. Eac

Re: mcrypt issue

2012-07-18 Thread Aaron Schneider
On 18/07/2012 17:25, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: -Original Message- From: Aaron Schneider On 16/07/2012 22:16, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: I am seeing an mcrypt problem with short plaintext strings. I don't have a Linux box to compare results, so I don't know if this is an upstream or a Cygwin is

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

2012-07-18 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 7/18/2012 11:38 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: Odd. Somebody seems to have put something in my Views directory - a directory I normally use for Clearcase views. But what's in there is not a Clearcase view! And it contained several cygwin1.dll's.

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

2012-07-18 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Odd. Somebody seems to have put something in my Views directory - a > directory I normally use for Clearcase views. But what's in there is not a > Clearcase view! And it contained several cygwin1.dll's. So I blew it way. > Sorry for the confu

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

2012-07-18 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 7/18/2012 8:04 AM, Reini Urban wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: On 7/17/2012 6:56 PM, Reini Urban wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: Is there a workaround for the problem mentioned in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00580.html?

Re: Built perl 5.6.2 on Cygwin 1.7.11, but get SIGABRT from resulting perl.exe

2012-07-18 Thread Nicholas DiPiazza
Jojelino asked: "What was the result of gdb --args perl symbol cygwin1.dll define btc bt c end # "Function "_sigfe_free" not defined." shouldn't be seen. if it does, please use latest snapshot including debug symbol. b _sigfe_free disp *((unsigned*)$esp+1)

RE: mcrypt issue

2012-07-18 Thread Nellis, Kenneth
-Original Message- From: Aaron Schneider On 16/07/2012 22:16, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: > I am seeing an mcrypt problem with short plaintext strings. > I don't have a Linux box to compare results, so I don't > know if this is an upstream or a Cygwin issue. > > $ mcrypt --version > Mcrypt v.2.

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

2012-07-18 Thread Reini Urban
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > On 7/17/2012 6:56 PM, Reini Urban wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>> >>> Is there a workaround for the problem mentioned in >>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00580.html? I suddenly started >>> getti

RE: www.alittlemadness.com

2012-07-18 Thread Jane Bronskill
Hi, Let's do a 3-way link swap with your website http://www.alittlemadness.com. I'll give you two links in exchange for one from you or I can give you 5 in exchange for 2 from you. 3-way linking is a very effective link building strategy. Since you're getting the links from third party website

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: byacc-20120526-1

2012-07-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
I've made a new version of 'byacc' available for installation. This is the most recent version of byacc available from Thomas Dickey's "fork" of the codebase which includes many fixes and modernizations. *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO *** If you want to unsubscribe from the c

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: octave-forge-20120714-1

2012-07-18 Thread marco atzeri
On 7/18/2012 2:19 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 18 14:07, marco atzeri wrote: On 7/18/2012 1:01 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-07-18 03:51, marco atzeri wrote: .mex are dll not exe files. I thought Octave modules were .oct? standard yes. mex are special Matlab compatible ones,

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: octave-forge-20120714-1

2012-07-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 18 14:07, marco atzeri wrote: > On 7/18/2012 1:01 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > >On 2012-07-18 03:51, marco atzeri wrote: > >>.mex are dll not exe files. > > > >I thought Octave modules were .oct? > > standard yes. > > mex are special Matlab compatible ones, in theory they should > work w

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: octave-forge-20120714-1

2012-07-18 Thread marco atzeri
On 7/18/2012 1:01 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-07-18 03:51, marco atzeri wrote: .mex are dll not exe files. I thought Octave modules were .oct? standard yes. mex are special Matlab compatible ones, in theory they should work with both Matlab and Octave... on previous nan-2.5.2,

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: octave-forge-20120714-1

2012-07-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-18 03:51, marco atzeri wrote: .mex are dll not exe files. I thought Octave modules were .oct? on previous nan-2.5.2, included in octave-forge-20120224-1 they were correctly identified as .mex on octave-forge-20120714-1, nan are wrong and tsa are right I will look on what caused t

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: octave-forge-20120714-1

2012-07-18 Thread Achim Gratz
marco atzeri gmail.com> writes: > .mex are dll not exe files. [...] > I will look on what caused the change, as temporary workaround > remove/copy the *.mex.exe to *.mex files. Thank you for the clarification. I'll see to prepare a patch to include these in rebaseall. Regards, Achim. --

Re: Differences between C++ 'new' operator and 'malloc()' (NOT a C/C++ question)

2012-07-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-18 04:27, Eliot Moss wrote: I'll just comment that AFAIK no Java VM runs in the cygwin environment -- all are native Windows apps. gcc4-java provides GIJ, and JamVM is available in Ports. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: htt

Re: Differences between C++ 'new' operator and 'malloc()' (NOT a C/C++ question)

2012-07-18 Thread Eliot Moss
I'll just comment that AFAIK no Java VM runs in the cygwin environment -- all are native Windows apps. It *might* be possible to get Jikes RVM to go under cygwin, but last I checked a piece of linux functionality is missing, namely the ability to look at and modify the register state saved in the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: octave-forge-20120714-1

2012-07-18 Thread marco atzeri
On 7/18/2012 10:04 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: marco atzeri gmail.com> writes: octave-forge-20120714-1 In the directory /usr/lib/octave/packages/nan-2.5.5/i686-pc-cygwin-api-v48+/ several *.mex.exe files have been installed. Apparently, these are actually DLL, not EXE files (at least that's wha

Re: Differences between C++ 'new' operator and 'malloc()' (NOT a C/C++ question)

2012-07-18 Thread Claude SIMON
Ryan Johnson wrote: > On 13/07/2012 4:25 AM, Al Slater wrote: >> On 12/07/2012 16:59, Claude SIMON wrote: >>> Ryan Johnson wrote: [...] Sorry, I should have actually looked at the repo before assuming the test case was a monstrosity. By way of penance, I've now looked,

Re: Differences between C++ 'new' operator and 'malloc()' (NOT a C/C++ question)

2012-07-18 Thread Claude SIMON
Al Slater wrote: > On 12/07/2012 16:59, Claude SIMON wrote: >> Ryan Johnson wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Sorry, I should have actually looked at the repo before assuming the >>> test case was a monstrosity. By way of penance, I've now looked, >>> downloaded, tweaked, and tested it. >>> >>> [...] >>

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: octave-forge-20120714-1

2012-07-18 Thread Achim Gratz
marco atzeri gmail.com> writes: > octave-forge-20120714-1 In the directory /usr/lib/octave/packages/nan-2.5.5/i686-pc-cygwin-api-v48+/ several *.mex.exe files have been installed. Apparently, these are actually DLL, not EXE files (at least that's what file and peflags claim they are) - and fol

Re: Differences between C++ 'new' operator and 'malloc()' (NOT a C/C++ question)

2012-07-18 Thread Claude SIMON
Csaba Raduly wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Claude SIMON wrote: > (snip) >> Since my last testings, I updated Cygwin, the JDK and the JRE. So, my >> current configuration is now : >> >> Windows Vista 32 bits SP2 >> Cygwin 1.7.15 >> g++ 4.5.3 >> javac 1.7.0_05 >> javah 1.7.0_05 >> java 1