On 12/22/2011 8:21 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Not to worry. You don't need flame-resistant gear until the _second_
transgression. ;-)
And that make two for me!
Hum past transgressions catching up with me or a double-hit on this
one?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
Hi,
On 22/12/11 13:38, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 9:10 PM, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> Hi Larry,
>>
>> On 22/12/11 12:25, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> On 12/21/2011 8:17 PM, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing a wider problem with sftp'ing to/from a Cygwin sshd
>
On 12/22/2011 8:17 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Not to worry. You don't need flame-resistant gear until the _second_
transgression. ;-)
I wear the flame-resistant gear all the time as one never knows what
someone will consider a transgression (smile)
Paul
ps: fyi --- I got this message
On 12/22/2011 11:18 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 12/22/2011 11:03 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Scanned problems.html ... given how far below the bar I was, your
"suggestion" was very gentle. It is now bookmarked so I can do better next
time.
Not to worry. You don't need flame-resistant ge
On 12/22/2011 11:03 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Scanned problems.html ... given how far below the bar I was, your
"suggestion" was very gentle. It is now bookmarked so I can do better next
time.
Not to worry. You don't need flame-resistant gear until the _second_
transgression. ;-)
--
Larry
On 12/22/2011 11:03 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Scanned problems.html ... given how far below the bar I was, your
"suggestion" was very gentle. It is now bookmarked so I can do better next
time.
Not to worry. You don't need flame-resistant gear until the _second_
transgression. ;-)
--
Larry
Hi Corinna,
On 23/12/11 11:18, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> On 23/12/11 02:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Dec 23 01:47, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>>> On 23/12/11 01:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Other than that I might have a solution. I applied a patch which only
adds the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_J
On 12/22/2011 7:50 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 12/22/2011 10:16 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Greetings.
I have a question or two regarding startxwin. When I fire it off using
"startxwin", I get two warnings which I have been ignoring but finally
decided I really ought to check to make sur
On 12/22/2011 10:16 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Greetings.
I have a question or two regarding startxwin. When I fire it off using
"startxwin", I get two warnings which I have been ignoring but finally
decided I really ought to check to make sure I am not seeing something I
shouldn't.
Question
Greetings.
I have a question or two regarding startxwin. When I fire it off using
"startxwin", I get two warnings which I have been ignoring but finally
decided I really ought to check to make sure I am not seeing something I
shouldn't.
They are:
+++
startxwin: XFree86_VT property unexpected
Hi Corinna,
On 23/12/11 02:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 23 01:47, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> On 23/12/11 01:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Other than that I might have a solution. I applied a patch which only
>>> adds the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_JOB flag if the calling process is member
>>>
Windows 7, no administrator rights.
version 2.761 seems to work fine.
As discussed previous in another thread, Windows 7 won't run
without administrator rights.
Download and run:
/usr/local/bin> curl -R http://cygwin.com/setup.exe-o getcygwin.exe
/usr/local/bin> chmod 777 getcygwin.exe
ls -og
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:00:06PM -0600, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>On 12/22/2011 01:58 PM, Greg Chicares wrote:
>> On 2011-12-22 18:08Z, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 12:15 PM, Greg Chicares wrote:
>> It appears that some recent change to setup.exe has unintentionally made
>> '--quiet-mo
On 12/22/2011 01:58 PM, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2011-12-22 18:08Z, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 12/21/2011 12:15 PM, Greg Chicares wrote:
> It appears that some recent change to setup.exe has unintentionally made
> '--quiet-mode' incompatible with '--packages' for command-line installs.
> [.
On 2011-12-22 18:08Z, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>> On 12/21/2011 12:15 PM, Greg Chicares wrote:
It appears that some recent change to setup.exe has unintentionally made
'--quiet-mode' incompatible with '--packages' for command-line installs.
[...]
> I've uploaded a snapshot of setup including th
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:43:03PM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
wrote:
>Shaddy Baddah sent the following at Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:12 AM
>>At this point, I should make a disclosure. To do this as a
>>non-Administrator grouped user, I must rename setup.exe to cygpkg.exe.
>>This d
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On second thought I'm a bit puzzled that the pthread stack isn't
> correctly aligned as well. Ignoring the pthread_attr_setstack case
> which wasn't supported so far anyway, the OS stack set up by
> CreateThread is 64K aligned. From that 64K aligned
Shaddy Baddah sent the following at Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:12 AM
>At this point, I should make a disclosure. To do this as a
>non-Administrator grouped user, I must rename setup.exe to cygpkg.exe.
>This defeats the later Windows releases abilities to automatically
>detect installer applicati
On 21/12/2011 23:13, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 21/12/2011 21:02, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>> On 12/21/2011 12:15 PM, Greg Chicares wrote:
>>> It appears that some recent change to setup.exe has unintentionally made
>>> '--quiet-mode' incompatible with '--packages' for command-line installs.
>>> A similar pr
porarily unavailable. ?Stop.
>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/vim/src'
>> Makefile:26: recipe for target `first' failed
>> make: *** [first] Error 2
>
>Tested with 20111222 and all is good again.
>
>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:53:53AM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
>On 12/13/2011 5:36 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 07:27:23PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>> On 25/07/2011 19.05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
"sleeping and waiting for signal" would mean that "bash i
; make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/vim/src'
> Makefile:26: recipe for target `first' failed
> make: *** [first] Error 2
Tested with 20111222 and all is good again.
Thanks cgf for all the effort in getting this functional again!
Chris
--
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.
On 12/22/2011 10:06 AM, RITTER, Philippe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> New fresh server. I'm trying to install sshd with all the latest release of
> cygwin. But when I what to connect as a domain user, I get only this error in
> the event log :
>
> Sshd: PID 3212: fatal: seteuid 10500: Permission denied
Hello,
New fresh server. I'm trying to install sshd with all the latest release of
cygwin. But when I what to connect as a domain user, I get only this error in
the event log :
Sshd: PID 3212: fatal: seteuid 10500: Permission denied
I have googled all this afternoon, but all tips didn't help m
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Btw., you are apparently not running the latest gcc-4. I just tried to
> compile this file (without my patch) on Cygwin and it works fine without
> any warning or error:
>
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 4.5.3
You are correct, although I just ran
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> The error message is kind of nonsense anyway. The expression in question
> is
>
> sizeof (cygheap_exec_info) + (nprocs * sizeof (children[0]))
>
> so it's just a `sizeof', not an actual usage of the member. Try this
> for now:
>
> Index: sigproc.c
On Dec 23 01:47, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> On 23/12/11 01:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Other than that I might have a solution. I applied a patch which only
> > adds the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_JOB flag if the calling process is member
> > of a job and the job allows a breakaway. It works in my lim
On Dec 22 16:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 22 09:20, Brian Ford wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the fix Christopher, but I must be using the wrong c
On Dec 22 09:20, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the fix Christopher, but I must be using the wrong compiler or
> > > something. Here's my next issue:
> >
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the fix Christopher, but I must be using the wrong compiler or
> > something. Here's my next issue:
> >
> > src/winsup/cygwin/child_info.h:
> > In static
On 23/12/11 01:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 23 00:07, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> On 22/12/11 22:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Dec 22 22:11, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
69 126706 [main] sh 3824 build_env: envp 0x61266AB4, envc 47
37 126743 [main] sh 3824 child_info::child_info:
On Dec 23 00:07, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> On 22/12/11 22:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Dec 22 22:11, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >>69 126706 [main] sh 3824 build_env: envp 0x61266AB4, envc 47
> >>37 126743 [main] sh 3824 child_info::child_info: subproc_ready 0x234
> >> 589 127332 [main]
Hi Corinna,
On 22/12/11 22:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 22 22:11, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> On 22/12/11 21:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Does it really work if you replace the DLL with 1.7.9 again? If so,
>>> you could try to find out which snapshot introduced the problem for you.
>>>
>>>
On Dec 22 22:11, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> On 22/12/11 21:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Does it really work if you replace the DLL with 1.7.9 again? If so,
> > you could try to find out which snapshot introduced the problem for you.
> >
> > Also, you could start the whole thing from strace to see w
Hi Corinna,
On 22/12/11 21:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 22 21:12, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> On 22/12/11 20:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Dec 22 18:09, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
On 06/12/11 20:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> A lot of changes and fixes have been made in Cygwin since 1.7
On Dec 22 21:12, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> On 22/12/11 20:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Dec 22 18:09, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >> On 06/12/11 20:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> A lot of changes and fixes have been made in Cygwin since 1.7.9 has
> >>> been released, so we're looking forward to rel
Hi Corinna,
On 22/12/11 20:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 22 18:09, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06/12/11 20:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> A lot of changes and fixes have been made in Cygwin since 1.7.9 has
>>> been released, so we're looking forward to release Cygwin 1.7.10 soon.
On Dec 21 15:25, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Brian Ford wrote:
>
> > Still trying, but getting the following warning turned into an error by
> > -Werror which looks like it might be valid?
> >
> > cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> > src/winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc:
> > In memb
On Dec 22 18:09, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/12/11 20:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > A lot of changes and fixes have been made in Cygwin since 1.7.9 has
> > been released, so we're looking forward to release Cygwin 1.7.10 soon.
> >
> > Please test the latest developer snapshots at http:/
Version 3.12.1-2 of ocaml has been uploaded.
OCaml is a fast modern type-inferring functional programming
language descended from the ML (Meta Language) family,
featuring objects, modules, and a high-performance
native-code compiler.
Version 3.12.1 includes many bug fixes and a handful of new
fea
40 matches
Mail list logo
