On 10/21/2011 11:45 AM, Jon Clugston wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/21/2011 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 20 08:13, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/19/2011 4:15 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I don't have a testcase yet, but I have a clearer idea of what's
happenin
Hi,
I just tried to use texi2pdf on Cygwin but it doesn't seem to work right.
There's a certain
amount of program activity but no PDF is generated. Here's the verbose log:
$ texi2pdf --verbose testfile.texi
/usr/bin/texi2dvi: Processing testfile.texi ...
/usr/bin/texi2dvi: BIBINPUTS='.:/home/An
On Oct 21 18:41, David Sastre wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:59:01AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 21 13:02, Luke Kendall wrote:
> > > Can I ask a related question: for the few shell scripts and /etc
> > > files provided in base-files: what license are they under? The
> > > packag
On Oct 21 12:32, gds wrote:
>
> If I do chmod 000 testfile I see with ls -l:
> -r--r--r--
> If I do chmod 777 testfile I see
> -rw-r--r--
> So there is a small effect but not much.
In noacl mode or on file systems not supporting ACLs (FAT, for instance)
permissions are emulated using the DOS R/O
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:59:01AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 21 13:02, Luke Kendall wrote:
> > Can I ask a related question: for the few shell scripts and /etc
> > files provided in base-files: what license are they under? The
> > package contains lots of licenses, as we've been disc
On 10/21/2011 10:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 21 10:16, gds wrote:
On 10/21/2011 06:55 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lem
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 20 08:13, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/19/2011 4:15 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I don't have a testcase yet, but I have a clearer idea of what's
happening. It actually has not
;
> The functionality works (directory is deleted), but an error is
> reported anyway:
>
> rm-8.4: cannot remove `lev1': Directory not empty
>
> The corresponding strace looks like:
> [...]
> 1754 244698 [main] rm-8.4 6088 seterrno_from_nt_status:
> /ext/build/net
On October 21, 2011 4:36 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 21 16:13, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> On October 21, 2011 12:55 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> >> This is by design here. IT wants it that way.
>> >
>> >Then "noacl' is the on
0x0
1754 244698 [main] rm-8.4 6088 seterrno_from_nt_status:
/ext/build/netrel/src/cygwin-snapshot-20111021-1/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_disk_file.cc:1735
status 0xC101 -> windows error 145
266 244964 [main] rm-8.4 6088 geterrno_from_win_error: windows error
145 == errno 90
237 245
On Oct 21 10:16, gds wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 06:55 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> >>On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
> >>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wro
On Oct 21 16:13, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> On October 21, 2011 12:55 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> >> This is by design here. IT wants it that way.
> >
> >Then "noacl' is the only way for you.
>
> Unless I wait for the next release, r
On 10/21/2011 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 20 08:13, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/19/2011 4:15 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I don't have a testcase yet, but I have a clearer idea of what's
happening. It actually has nothing to do with the gdb subprocess, but
rather is a problem that can occur when
On 10/21/2011 06:55 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
I know this an old thread but I am in exactly
On October 21, 2011 12:55 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >
>> >On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
>> >> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >I k
Hi
New versions of 'gnutls/libgnutls26/libgnutls-devel' have been uploaded to a
server near you.
o Update to latest upstream version
o Build for cygwin 1.7.9 with gcc-4.5.3
gnutls NEWS:
===
Version 2.12.11 (released 2011-09-18)
** libgnutls: Memory leak fixes in credentials p
On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
> >> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >I know this an old thread but I am in exactly the same situation as
On Oct 20 10:19, Manuel Wienand wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> it seems that spawning a process brakes the reopening of a serial port
> (when done during the execution of that process). The result of the
> open() function is "Permission denied (13)" in that case.
I had a look into your testcase. What you s
On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
>> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >I know this an old thread but I am in exactly the same situation as
>> >the OP. Access with 1.7.7 and before worked fine, 1.7.9 has t
On Oct 20 08:13, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 4:15 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >I don't have a testcase yet, but I have a clearer idea of what's
> >happening. It actually has nothing to do with the gdb subprocess, but
> >rather is a problem that can occur whenever emacs is running its main
> >comman
On Oct 20 19:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 20 15:57, Franz Sirl wrote:
> > Am 2011-10-20 15:09, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> > >As I wrote, it's not used, so even if it fails, it's worth a
> > >support case with Novell, but it doesn't mean we have to change
> > >Cygwin.
> >
> > It fails with
On Oct 21 13:02, Luke Kendall wrote:
> Can I ask a related question: for the few shell scripts and /etc
> files provided in base-files: what license are they under? The
> package contains lots of licenses, as we've been discussing, but I
> couldn't find any indication of which license applies to t
On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>
> >
> >I know this an old thread but I am in exactly the same situation as
> >the OP. Access with 1.7.7 and before worked fine, 1.7.9 has this
> >problem. The workaround with explicit noacl option works for
On Oct 21 10:24, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Three snapshots yesterday! Great!
>
> However, i discovered an irregularity for the last one:
>
> The cvs change by cgf dated 2011-10-20 21:35:59
> with Log message:
> * fhandler.h (fhandler*::copyto): Free path_conv strings first.
>
Hello,
Three snapshots yesterday! Great!
However, i discovered an irregularity for the last one:
The cvs change by cgf dated 2011-10-20 21:35:59
with Log message:
* fhandler.h (fhandler*::copyto): Free path_conv strings first.
* path.h (cfree_and_null): Rename and expand from cfr
25 matches
Mail list logo
