One more thing:
RFC 2822:
``When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the mailbox(es)
to which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent.''
[ 3.6.2 Originator fields ]
Note that the Cygwin mailing list is not the author of this message;
herefore, it is abusing the Rep
Christopher Faylor writes:
The convention in this mailing list is that you read the mailing list.
Hi Christopher,
I see now from the archives that this list is configured
to generate the unfortunate Reply-to header, which by many
is considered a mailing list misconfiguration.
[[ Apologies t
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:43:42PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>My STCs still don't work right for me under the 2011-10-10 snapshot.
>The bash subprocess no longer shows as stopped when I run ps, but it
>doesn't produce any output either, and it doesn't terminate for several
>minutes. I eventually
On 10/10/2011 6:06 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:58:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:39:20PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
Attached is a slight modification of the STC, in which I set stdin for
the bash subprocess to /dev/null. With this mod
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:02:18PM -0700, jan.kolar wrote:
>Christopher Faylor-8 wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:58:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:39:20PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
Attached is a slight modification of the STC, in which I set stdin for
>>
Christopher Faylor-8 wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:58:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:39:20PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>Attached is a slight modification of the STC, in which I set stdin for
>>>the bash subprocess to /dev/null. With this modificatio
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:42:45AM -0700, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
>Corinna Vinschen writes:
>
>> > $ gcc -Wall -ansi -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=2 posix-ansi.c
> ^
>> fileno and pclose are *not* ANSI functions. Therefore, if you define
>> -ansi, you get the below errors. The newlib headers have explicit
>>
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:58:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:39:20PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>>Attached is a slight modification of the STC, in which I set stdin for
>>the bash subprocess to /dev/null. With this modification, the program
>>works as expected (an
i fixed this problem by following the WordNet's FAQ "the workaround is to
move the installer (WordNet-3.0.exe) into an empty folder and try again.".
Thanks.
Some random ideas:
1. check with http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/faq/#q.3
I downloaded from the official website. yes, I tried it on another computer,
which doesn't have cygwin at all, it works.
But on this machine which has been installed with cygwin and then removed,
it has this problem. I removed all the cygwin directories, and remove it
from the registry table. It s
gviewer sent the following at Monday, October 10, 2011 1:52 PM
>Hello, I used to be able to install WordNet alone on my Windows machine.
>
>Recently I want to install wordnet on a new Windows 7 machine. However,
>The WordNet installer always triggers the cygwin installer. I don't want
>to do that.
gviewer wrote:
>
> Hello, I used to be able to install WordNet alone on my Windows machine.
> Recently I want to install wordnet on a new Windows 7 machine. However,
> The WordNet installer always triggers the cygwin installer. I don't want
> to do that. then I remove cygwin from my machine, bu
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> $ gcc -Wall -ansi -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=2 posix-ansi.c
^
fileno and pclose are *not* ANSI functions. Therefore, if you define
-ansi, you get the below errors. The newlib headers have explicit
#ifndef __STRICT_ANSI__ guards around the non-ANSI definitions.
Hi Corin
Hello, I used to be able to install WordNet alone on my Windows machine.
Recently I want to install wordnet on a new Windows 7 machine. However, The
WordNet installer always triggers the cygwin installer. I don't want to do
that. then I remove cygwin from my machine, but still I can't install
word
Chuck, ping?
On Oct 5 14:23, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/5/2011 1:31 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >On 10/5/2011 12:27 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Oct 5 18:04, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> >>>Op 4-10-2011 20:20, Corinna Vinschen schreef:
> On Oct 4 20:03, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> >By
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
wrote:
> It is a known issue that the testsuite does not build with the latest
> orc:
OK, I'll revert to your orc & try from there.
> That being said, libschroedinger1.0 and liborc0.4 are already available
> in Ports.
Yep. Thanks for those, sin
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:53:04AM -0400, SJ Wright wrote:
>On this last: since reading somewhere that a lot of mirrors and
>repositories don't keep up with the latest versions of things as Exiv2,
It's not clear what "things as Exiv2" has to do with mirrors. It
obviously won't be reflected on a
On 10/9/2011 12:08 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 17:43 -0400, SJ Wright wrote:
I really don't know what could be causing this. Has anyone else had
stackdump problems with software not in the repositories, which they've
kept installed through an update such as mine?
If you g
On Oct 9 11:23, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:08:58 -0700, Kaz Kylheku
> wrote:
> > reason, I cannot get a warning about fileno from this test case if
> > I add a reference to it. I will try to produce a minimal repro test
> > case for that.
>
> In my real program I have -Wall,
19 matches
Mail list logo
