On 6/4/2011 2:22 PM, René Berber wrote:
> On 6/4/2011 12:49 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
>> René Berber suggested:
>>
>>> Use i686-pc-mingw32-gcc instead.
>>
>> That worked, thanks. That's not 100% correct, though, the command is
>> (or seems to be):
>>
>> i686-w64-mingw32-gcc
No, the mingw-gcc(
On 6/4/2011 12:49 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> René Berber suggested:
>
>> Use i686-pc-mingw32-gcc instead.
>
> That worked, thanks. That's not 100% correct, though, the command is
> (or seems to be):
>
> i686-w64-mingw32-gcc
One is for 32-bit the other for 64-bit, but the 64-bit is suppos
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, I asked:
> What is the easiest way to transition from the gcc3 environment?
>
> gcc -mno-cygwin ...
>
> to the equivalent compile using gcc4 (I can hand off a .exe file w/o
> cygwin1.dll)?
René Berber suggested:
> Use i686-pc-mingw32-gcc instead.
That worked, t
3 matches
Mail list logo
