Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
> On 12/29/2010 11:46 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>> When I do an 'ls -al' (or a getfacl) on some files, I get:
>> owner/group = ???/???, implying that the numeric uid/gid are
>> not found in the passwd/group file.
>>
>> This occurs even though I ran:
>>
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:25:17PM -0700, ERIC HO wrote:
>Using the cat or file command on a file, the output is readable. But
>if I use vim or less command, the output is either unreadable or
>nothing displayed. Not sure why the file output is readable from some
>commands and not others. Any wa
Using the cat or file command on a file, the output is readable. But if I use
vim or less command, the output is either unreadable or nothing displayed.
Not sure why the file output is readable from some commands and not others. Any
way I can use vim/less command to display this file readable? T
I'm having a problem with cygwin 1.7.7
and X version 1.9.3.0 where an OpenGL
application from perl using the Mesa3D
binding dies in the test with a segfault:
A fatal error has occurred and Cygwin/X
will now exit.
Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault).
Server aborting.
Please open /var
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Win7, a "DIR /Q" on a mapped share similarly shows an owner of
"BUILTIN\Administrators", but a "stat" or a "ls -ln" in a cygwin bash shell
always shows a uid of 544 and a gid of 545, _no matter who_ the logged-in
user or the actual file ownership.
Hi--
On running Cygwin setup today, Norton Security complained about two files
tee.ext and date.exe
Norton used its SONAR (see below) to detect what it thought was a high
security risk. They claimed programs were behaving suspicious on my
computer. One thing that flagged these files was that
Please forgive the cross-post; I'm not sure where this issue lies.
Samba 3.5.1, CentOS 5.5 x86_64 PDC with Win2K, WinXP, Win2003 and Win7
32-bit domain members, tdbsam backend. Cygwin 1.7.7. All basic
functionality seems to be fine, except...
On Win2K, WinXP and Win2003, a "DIR /Q" on a mappe
On 01/01/2011 09:08 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 31 December 2010 18:22, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
I do not imply the devs are ignorant - just busy perhaps.
Good. If you'd also contemplated the possibility that the current
state was deliberately decided on as the least bad solution,
While I did eventu
On 31 December 2010 18:22, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> I do not imply the devs are ignorant - just busy perhaps.
Good. If you'd also contemplated the possibility that the current
state was deliberately decided on as the least bad solution, you might
have written your complaint in more temperate langua
9 matches
Mail list logo
