Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 06:47 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> On 11/12/2009 09:14 AM, dexter_mich...@emc wrote:
Should my ID output be the same as when I log into a unix server
here, or would it be different? My cygwin is running on a Windows
>>
(I'm reposting this message since Yahoo decided to leave out line breaks. Sorry
for unintentionally sending HTML mail.)
I have a batch of Unix-based Perl scripts that I use for CD
ripping. They use a queue-based approach. One process reads
discs, another process encodes and tags them, and a thir
On 11/12/2009 06:47 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 11/12/2009 09:14 AM, dexter_mich...@emc wrote:
Should my ID output be the same as when I log into a unix server here,
or would it be different? My cygwin is running on a Windows workstation
so maybe it is grabbing my AD gro
Karl M wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:46:12 -0800
>> Currently when upgrading the base 'cygwin' package, the installer only warns
>> you midway through the installation after some files have been
>> removed/replaced.
>>
>> If you have other cygwin processes running, you may be left in an inco
Dave Korn wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 11/12/2009 12:46 PM, Ralph Hempel wrote:
These three items are easily adressed with the command line options
in setup, and by keeping track of the packages you have installed
in a little text file.
Without splitting hairs too finely, I don't actu
Federico Hernandez wrote:
>>> Sounds like you may be missing dll. cygcheck yourprogram.exe might help.
>> Thank you. We will do this.
>>
>> A gdb run provided some exit code which google and the mailing list
>> archive suggested to be some dll problem. Now I know how to find out.
>
> Problem solv
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 12:46 PM, Ralph Hempel wrote:
>> These three items are easily adressed with the command line options
>> in setup, and by keeping track of the packages you have installed
>> in a little text file.
>
> FYI /etc/setup/installed.db has a record of all the ins
Jeremy Bopp writes:
> BTW, this is not only a problem for the cygwin package. Literally any
> package could have files which are in use at the time of replacement.
> So any solution would need to take that into account.
True but sometimes the perfect is the enemy of the good enough...
The 'cygwi
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 09:14 AM, dexter_mich...@emc wrote:
>> Should my ID output be the same as when I log into a unix server here,
>> or would it be different? My cygwin is running on a Windows workstation
>> so maybe it is grabbing my AD groups as opposed to my NIS groups.
>
>> Sounds like you may be missing dll. cygcheck yourprogram.exe might help.
>
> Thank you. We will do this.
>
> A gdb run provided some exit code which google and the mailing list
> archive suggested to be some dll problem. Now I know how to find out.
Problem solved. We have discovered the missin
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:46:12 -0800
> Subject: Suggestion: Have setup.exe warn before upgrading 'cgywin' package
> itself
>
>
> Currently when upgrading the base 'cygwin' package, the installer only warns
> you midway through the installation after some files have been
> removed/replaced.
>
aputerguy wrote:
> Currently when upgrading the base 'cygwin' package, the installer only warns
> you midway through the installation after some files have been
> removed/replaced.
>
> If you have other cygwin processes running, you may be left in an incomplete
> state where you can't or don't wan
Currently when upgrading the base 'cygwin' package, the installer only warns
you midway through the installation after some files have been
removed/replaced.
If you have other cygwin processes running, you may be left in an incomplete
state where you can't or don't want to kill the other cygwin p
> Sounds like you may be missing dll. cygcheck yourprogram.exe might help.
Thank you. We will do this.
A gdb run provided some exit code which google and the mailing list
archive suggested to be some dll problem. Now I know how to find out.
Greetings,
Federico
--
Problem reports: http://
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:01:05PM +0100, Federico Hernandez wrote:
>I have a command line application that does not have any output on
>stdout on one computer (WinXP SP2) but works fine and doing output on
>stdout on other computers (WinXP SP2 and SP3, Win7).
Sounds like you may be missing dll.
Hi
I have a command line application that does not have any output on
stdout on one computer (WinXP SP2) but works fine and doing output on
stdout on other computers (WinXP SP2 and SP3, Win7).
This is on cygwin 1.5. The application is compiled with g++ 4.3.2-2.
We have reinstalled cygwin from scr
On 11/12/2009 12:46 PM, Ralph Hempel wrote:
These three items are easily adressed with the command line options
in setup, and by keeping track of the packages you have installed
in a little text file.
FYI /etc/setup/installed.db has a record of all the installed packages.
--
Larry Hall
I have a batch of Unix-based Perl scripts that I use for CD ripping. They use a
queue-based approach. One process reads discs, another process encodes and tags
them, and a third process uploads them to a file server. I've been running this
on Cygwin for several years. I used cdda2wav to read dat
Linda Walsh wrote:
1) why does it re-ask me for my proxy and not remember my server choice
each time I enter setup.
2) why does it maximize each time I enter the package choice? Ouch! hard
on the eyes to have my entire screen filled with white!
3). How do I make the type larger? 6pt font is
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 07:54:48AM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
>1) why does it re-ask me for my proxy and not remember my server choice
>each time I enter setup.
WJFFM.
>2) why does it maximize each time I enter the package choice? Ouch! hard
>on the eyes to have my entire screen filled with whit
On 11/12/2009 09:14 AM, dexter_mich...@emc.com wrote:
Well I am not really sure exactly what I should be seeing. I think the
command I ran was incorrect, also I had stopped the command from
completing half way through. Now if I look at me /etc/groups file there
appears to be an entry for every
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 12 10:31, Eliot Moss wrote:
I think that Corinna (et al.?) thought this was more likely to
be a problem in rsync introduce by its relatively recent
revision from 3.0.5 to 3.0.6.
Me? No, I never said that.
Just my possibly mistaken impression then. In any case,
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 12 03:54, Linda Walsh wrote:
I am having my first experiences on 64-bit windows and noticed that 32-bit
processes, more so than 64-bit user processes are virtualized are not able
to access or see parts of the machine. This is especially noticeable in the
registry.
1) why does it re-ask me for my proxy and not remember my server choice
each time I enter setup.
2) why does it maximize each time I enter the package choice? Ouch! hard
on the eyes to have my entire screen filled with white!
3). How do I make the type larger? 6pt font is a bit small -- I kno
On Nov 12 10:31, Eliot Moss wrote:
> I think that Corinna (et al.?) thought this was more likely to
> be a problem in rsync introduce by its relatively recent
> revision from 3.0.5 to 3.0.6.
Me? No, I never said that.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding C
Eliot Moss wrote:
I am getting this output when trying to rsync
to any of several systems. I have RSYNC_RSH set
to use ssh, and the ssh commands work just fine.
This smells like some kind of non-matching library
issue to me ...
rsync: Failed to dup/close: Bad file descriptor (9)
rsync error: err
I am still trying to work this out.
It is well known that cygwin rsync hangs on pulling from Microsoft Windows
(but works when pushing).
I am trying to find some way to reverse the process: have the remote server
PUSH instead of having the local server PULL.
The situation is as follows: I ha
On Nov 12 03:54, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I am having my first experiences on 64-bit windows and noticed that 32-bit
> processes, more so than 64-bit user processes are virtualized are not able
> to access or see parts of the machine. This is especially noticeable in the
> registry.
Did you notice th
Well I am not really sure exactly what I should be seeing. I think the
command I ran was incorrect, also I had stopped the command from
completing half way through. Now if I look at me /etc/groups file there
appears to be an entry for every single group in the company but it
stops at G - this mus
I am having my first experiences on 64-bit windows and noticed that 32-bit
processes, more so than 64-bit user processes are virtualized are not able
to access or see parts of the machine. This is especially noticeable in the
registry.
This means that if one has been using cygwin tools to ass
30 matches
Mail list logo
