Hi!
I would like to redistribute a console application developed in a
cygwin environment to people that do not have cygwin installed.
Usually, I put the executable in a directory and using a cmd window of
XP i try to run the executable. An erro message appears because a dll
is miss.
Join all the dl
aputerguy wrote:
> In particular, I can't use "mount -p" to distinguish between prefixes that
> might have (variable) number of trailing spaces (which is allowed).
I believe that you want to use the cygpath program if you want to
convert POSIX paths to Windows paths reliably. Assuming the default
> Andrew Schulman wrote:
> >> For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being
> >> backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls.
> >>
> >> When I use something like:
> >>find /c -exec getfacl {} \; > mysavefile
> >>
> >> It is slow, in part at least because
In particular, I can't use "mount -p" to distinguish between prefixes that
might have (variable) number of trailing spaces (which is allowed).
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/1.7--Can-you-have-multipe-cygdrive-path-prefixes-active-at-once-tp26227605p26227607.html
Sent fro
The mount manpage says:
-p, --show-cygdrive-prefix
show user and/or system cygdrive path prefix
The and/or would suggest you could have different user and system cygdrive
path prefixes active at once, which would potentially be a bit confusing
Also, is there a better way to
cygserver service runs well but "ipcs" command report bad system call.
Other programs need ipc operator also can't run now.
I rollbacked to 1.7.0-062 and it seems everything goes fine
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentat
A test with an empty main compiled using gcc-4 under cygwin-1.7.0-63
has a size of 6.5K. After downgrading to 1.7.0-62, without changing
anything else, the size goes down to 5.0K.
$ cat test.c
int main(void)
{
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c -Os -s
Looking at objdump differences, both code and data si
OK. Here is a simple test case:
X=10
while [ $X -gt 0 ] ; do echo "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog"
; let X=X-1; done > testfile
time grep dog testfile | wc
Cygwin 1.5:
real0m0.219s
user0m0.232s
sys 0m0.045s
Cygwin 1.7:
real7m46.575s
user7m14.138s
sys
2009/11/6 Steven Monai:
> Fantastic! I just upgraded from 1.7.0-62 to -63, and my daily rsync
> backup script can now see that handful of files on my system with
> "weird" names [containing Unicode char U+F020] that were previously
> untouchable by Cygwin.
>
> Just wondering: What limitations, if a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Larry Hall (Cygwin) on 11/5/2009 9:13 PM:
> What "empty line between the getfacls stanzas"?
The blank line that is output after one getfacl process ends. Try
'getfacl . .; getfacl .' vs. 'getfacl .; getfacl . .' to see it.
The number of
On 11/05/2009 11:05 PM, aputerguy wrote:
OK... one small problem.
Every ~4500 lines and (70-80K characters), both of these methods omit the
empty line between the getfacl stanzas. The skipped lines however don't
occur at the same places in the two different methods.
I assume it must be due to b
OK... one small problem.
Every ~4500 lines and (70-80K characters), both of these methods omit the
empty line between the getfacl stanzas. The skipped lines however don't
occur at the same places in the two different methods.
I assume it must be due to buffering of the long line input or somethin
On 11/05/2009 10:04 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
If people get used to symlinks being around as they are
on unix, then such a 'privilege' might become a common place
configuration -- thus my desire to see cygwin be able to at least
recognize and treat them as symlinks (first and foremost), with
'c
Andrew Schulman-3 wrote:
> getfacl -R?
Unfortunately, no '-R' at least on my updated version.
The "-exec ... \+" and the "-print0 | xargs -0" tricks both worked!!!
Thanks.
Timing and comparing the two approaches, it seems like they both use the
same 'user' time but the xargs approach uses only
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 07:11:02PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
>aputerguy wrote:
>> Running grep on a 20MB file with ~100,000 matches takes an incredible almost
>> 8 minutes under Cygwin 1.7 while taking just 0.2 seconds under Cygwin 1.5
>> (on a 2nd machine).
>
>I've seen nasty behavior with grep th
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 07:04:09PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Will ln -s be chansed to support native symbolic links?
> No, not until, at least, native symbolic links don't require elevated
> privileges to use.
>>> -
>>> They don't have to..."sorta": Un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Reisert AD1C on 11/5/2009 1:19 PM:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Christopher Faylor
> wrote:
>
>> That sounds like a good bet to me. Setting LANG=en_US.UTF-8 allows X to
>> run correctly for me.
>
> The only "funny" thing abou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to aputerguy on 11/5/2009 2:34 PM:
>>From the cygwin shell, I can do tab-completion on drive letters to get
> things like C:/usr/bin/ls
> However, when I press return, I get:
> bash: C:/usr/bin/ls: No such file or directory
> Which is u
aputerguy wrote:
Running grep on a 20MB file with ~100,000 matches takes an incredible almost
8 minutes under Cygwin 1.7 while taking just 0.2 seconds under Cygwin 1.5
(on a 2nd machine).
---
I've seen nasty behavior with grep that isnt' cygwin
specific. Try "pcregrep" and see if you have the
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Will ln -s be chansed to support native symbolic links?
No, not until, at least, native symbolic links don't require elevated
privileges to use.
-
They don't have to..."sorta": Under the User-rights assignment plugin,
where you assign what users/groups have what p
On 11/05/2009 08:19 PM, nwpu053...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems that the file /etc/crontab must be owned by root. But there
is not a root user in my computer.
How could solve the problem? Do i have to create a root user for windows?
Be careful. Things are not always as they first seem.
I'm going
Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being
>> backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls.
>>
>> When I use something like:
>>find /c -exec getfacl {} \; > mysavefile
>>
>> It is slow, in part at least because it has to fork a
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
...
> Bugfixes:
> =
...
> - Improve the roundtrip capability when converting singlebyte chars to
> the UNICODE prvate use area U+F0xx and vice versa.
Fantastic! I just upgraded from 1.7.0-62 to -63, and my daily rsync
backup script can now see that handful of file
>
> For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being
> backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls.
>
> When I use something like:
>find /c -exec getfacl {} \; > mysavefile
>
> It is slow, in part at least because it has to fork a call to getfacl on
> eac
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:27:07PM -0800, aputerguy wrote:
>
>Running grep on a 20MB file with ~100,000 matches takes an incredible almost
>8 minutes under Cygwin 1.7 while taking just 0.2 seconds under Cygwin 1.5
>(on a 2nd machine).
>
>The following cases show how grep under 1.7 grinds to a halt
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 01:00:13AM +, Dave Korn wrote:
>Joe Crepeau wrote:
>>I sent this out a few days ago and got no reply. Does anybody have a
>>response to this?
>
>It's never worked for me either, and now thanks to you I know exactly
>why, but I don't have any answer(*). Sorry.
I someho
Dave Korn wrote:
Hans Horn wrote:
Do you where this gobble stuff ‘ comes from, btw?
GCC is trying to use the appropriate set of internationalized opening and
closing single-quote marks. If you "export LC_LANG=C.ASCII", you'll get
regular apostrophes.
It's -fno-leading-underscore.
Have
it seems that the file /etc/crontab must be owned by root. But there
is not a root user in my computer.
How could solve the problem? Do i have to create a root user for windows?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
aputerguy wrote:
> The data 'testfile' is a plain text file of the acl's of all the 108,000
> files on my Windoze computer.
So, the "find | xargs" trick worked then did it? :-)
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygw
Hans Horn wrote:
>>
>> Do you where this gobble stuff ‘ comes from, btw?
GCC is trying to use the appropriate set of internationalized opening and
closing single-quote marks. If you "export LC_LANG=C.ASCII", you'll get
regular apostrophes.
> It's -fno-leading-underscore.
> Have to see wheth
Joe Crepeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent this out a few days ago and got no reply. Does anybody have a
> response to this?
It's never worked for me either, and now thanks to you I know exactly why,
but I don't have any answer(*). Sorry.
cheers,
DaveK
--
(*) - beyond "I'm working my wa
Running grep on a 20MB file with ~100,000 matches takes an incredible almost
8 minutes under Cygwin 1.7 while taking just 0.2 seconds under Cygwin 1.5
(on a 2nd machine).
The following cases show how grep under 1.7 grinds to a halt as the number
of matches increases.
The data 'testfile' is a pla
Hans Horn wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
Hans Horn wrote:
Folks,
what is the current status of -ffast-math for gcc4 under cygwin.
I tried to use it for some numerical C code and get the following link
errors:
eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `_f_pow'
eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x7d8):
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:55:29PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
>Sorry to bring up and older topic, but I'm only beginning to explore Vista
>and run into some of its cra^h^h^hnew features.
>
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>> On Oct 29 02:40, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> On 10/29/2009 01:26 AM, Neil Mowb
On 11/05/2009 05:43 PM, aputerguy wrote:
I read the materials in "What's New" and the section "Windows Security in
Cygwin" with interest since it describes new authentication potentials.
However, I did not understand the material well enough to know whether 1.7
will allow users to ssh under the
Dave Korn wrote:
Hans Horn wrote:
Folks,
what is the current status of -ffast-math for gcc4 under cygwin.
I tried to use it for some numerical C code and get the following link
errors:
eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `_f_pow'
eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x7d8): undefined referenc
Sorry to bring up and older topic, but I'm only beginning to explore Vista
and run into some of its cra^h^h^hnew features.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 29 02:40, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 10/29/2009 01:26 AM, Neil Mowbray wrote:
On NTFS systems that support real symbolic links (eg those
I read the materials in "What's New" and the section "Windows Security in
Cygwin" with interest since it describes new authentication potentials.
However, I did not understand the material well enough to know whether 1.7
will allow users to ssh under their own $USERNAME or whether you will always
Hi,
I sent this out a few days ago and got no reply. Does anybody have a
response to this?
Has the problem with redirecting stdin under gdb been fixed? The most recent
posting I can find is from 1999 and it was a known problem then.
The problem is when you start up gdb and then type
aputerguy wrote:
> For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being
> backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls.
>
> When I use something like:
>find /c -exec getfacl {} \; > mysavefile
>
> It is slow, in part at least because it has to fork a call to ge
Hans Horn wrote:
> Folks,
>
> what is the current status of -ffast-math for gcc4 under cygwin.
>
> I tried to use it for some numerical C code and get the following link
> errors:
>
> eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `_f_pow'
> eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x7d8): undefined reference
On 11/05/2009 05:00 PM, aputerguy wrote:
For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being
backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls.
When I use something like:
find /c -exec getfacl {} \;> mysavefile
It is slow, in part at least because it has to for
For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being
backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls.
When I use something like:
find /c -exec getfacl {} \; > mysavefile
It is slow, in part at least because it has to fork a call to getfacl on
each file found.
Is t
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> In Cygwin 1.7 you can do this for any subdir in your volume shadow copy:
>
> $ ls -l //?/GLOBALROOT/Device/HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy1/subdir
>
> It just doesn't work for the root directory of a drive due to internal
> path handling restrictions. But there's a simple wo
Folks,
what is the current status of -ffast-math for gcc4 under cygwin.
I tried to use it for some numerical C code and get the following link
errors:
eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `_f_pow'
eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x7d8): undefined reference to `_f_log'
eval.o:eval.c:(.text
On 05/11/2009 15:14, Lee Maschmeyer wrote:
I'm using cygwin 1.7.0-63 with everything installed. I get a
segmentation fault whenever I or any of my scripts issue the command:
tput clear
Are other people getting this?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-10/msg00747.html
Yaakov
--
Problem report
> Larry Hall (Cygwin) writes
> On 11/02/2009 01:29 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>> I didn't see any documentation in the What's New/What's Changed
>> document saying that the following no longer works:
>>:
>> For example:
>> $ ls C:
>> ls: cannot access C:: No such file
Hi all,
I'm using cygwin 1.7.0-63 with everything installed. I get a segmentation
fault whenever I or any of my scripts issue the command:
tput clear
Are other people getting this? If not I'll have to go through the whole bug
reporting process but I thought I'd ask first. Attached is
tput.e
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Christopher Faylor
wrote:
> That sounds like a good bet to me. Setting LANG=en_US.UTF-8 allows X to
> run correctly for me.
The only "funny" thing about that setting is that the date in my "ls"
output is a little different. Is there any way to get the old date
On 05/11/2009 13:03, Dave Korn wrote:
%PATHEXT%
Ah, but that doesn't have ".sys". Doh.
And it does have a lot of extensions that are NOT PE/COFF executables
(e.g. .bat).
Wonder if there's a more complete list in the registry somewhere.
I think the only reliable way will be to d
On 05/11/2009 13:02, Dave Korn wrote:
So probably just adding a dummy free() implementation will do the job?
Unfortunately not.
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Dave Korn wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 07:22:25PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Probably we would need to check for any kind
>>> of Windows executable suffix like .exe, .sys, .com. I have to admit,
>>> though, that I never saw a .src suffix for a Windows binar
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 5 18:22, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> 2009/11/5 Yaakov (Cygwin/X):
> extern void _exit (int);
> extern char* strdup (const char*);
static int are_we_stuck = 1;
> char* malloc(unsigned n) {
are_we_stuck = 0;
> return 0;
> }
>
>>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 07:22:25PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Probably we would need to check for any kind
>> of Windows executable suffix like .exe, .sys, .com. I have to admit,
>> though, that I never saw a .src suffix for a Windows binary...
>
> Well, in this
54 matches
Mail list logo
