I guess the answer depends a bit on cluster size but discounting /home/
and /usr/local/ (you will need to make your own allowances) I get
Cygwin [1.5] = 4560M
Cygwin [1.7] = 4714M
so neither fits on a 4G stick any more.
Fergus
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
P
On Mon, June 15, 2009 19:53, Sisyphus wrote:
> Here are some timings I did recently for building the mpc-0.6 library.
> On Vista and XP, (in the same version of the MSYS shell, and using the
> same
> version of MinGW's gcc) I ran:
>
> ./configure --disable-shared --enable-static CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/loc
Chuck,
There's a bug in LT_PATH_LD (AC_PROG_LD) when called prior to LT_INIT
(AC_PROG_LIBTOOL):
checking for ld used by gcc...
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.2/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: no
input files
./configure: line 3955: : command not found
Yet this does not occur when the sa
I guess it is because of some security specialty, check your settings.
2009/6/15 Vincent R. :
> Hi,
>
> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo 3.0
> Ghz and SSD
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Perhaps there is a problem on the mirrors: run2 is in the repository but
> setup.ini is dated 20090609, and it does not contain references to run2.
Confirmed. This is actually a sourceware problem, not a mirror problem.
The last time setup.ini (or setup-2.ini) was updated
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent R."
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:03 AM
Subject: Optimize cygwin on recent windows version (Vista and Seven)
Hi,
Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
I switched to a more power
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:39:39 +0100, Andy Koppe
wrote:
>> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
>> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
>> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo
>> 3.0
>> Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex)
>> and running windows Seven.
On Jun 15 13:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 15 11:22, Fr?d?ric Bron wrote:
> > > To fix your application, call either
> > >
> > > struct ifconf ifc;
> > > ifc.ifc_len = sizeof (struct ifreq) * 32;
> > > ifc.ifc_buf = malloc (ifc.ifc_len);
> > > if (ioctl (fd, SIOCGIFCONF, &ifc))
> > >
2009/6/15 Christopher Faylor:
>>One issue that I've noticed on Windows 7, both with Cygwin 1.5 and
>>1.7, is that trying to log a utmp entry when starting a terminal can
>>take up to half a minute, presumably due to waiting for some sort of
>>timeout.
>
> Sorry but this isn't a much more useful rep
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:39:39PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
>> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
>> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo 3.0
>> Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex)
>> and running windows Seve
> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo 3.0
> Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex)
> and running windows Seven.
> Now when I test cygwin, everything is so sloowww
Not ex
"probably larger than 800MB installed" doesn't help much, when was that
written? 1995? I have an old version of Cygwin (over 3 years old, no
updates) on my computer that takes almost 3GB of disk space. I wanted to
make a full new download of Cygwin for another computer, so I was
wondering if
Perhaps there is a problem on the mirrors: run2 is in the repository but
setup.ini is dated 20090609, and it does not contain references to run2.
Cheers,
Angelo.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentati
From: Damián Rodríguez Sánchez
> How big (approximately) is a complete current Cygwin installation ?
The FAQ is your friend.
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.disk-space
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/pr
How big (approximately) is a complete current Cygwin installation ?
Thanks.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
OK. I withdraw my proposal.
2009/6/16 Corinna Vinschen :
> On Jun 15 23:35, IWAMURO Motonori wrote:
>> 2009/6/15 Corinna Vinschen:
>> > If everybody agrees to this suggestion, here's the patch.
>>
>> Is the name of modifier prefix "cjk-" good? It influences not CJK
>> characters but a part of symb
On Jun 15 23:35, IWAMURO Motonori wrote:
> 2009/6/15 Corinna Vinschen:
> > If everybody agrees to this suggestion, here's the patch.
>
> Is the name of modifier prefix "cjk-" good? It influences not CJK
> characters but a part of symbols and European characters.
> Please refer to Andy's opinion:
>
Hi,
Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo 3.0
Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex)
and running windows Seven.
Now when I test cygwin, everything is so sloowww, I know this i
2009/6/15 Corinna Vinschen :
>> Yes, but the guideline exists.
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00444.html
>
> A single mail in a single mailing list of a single project. That's rather
> a suggestion than a guideline...
Sorry, my writing was bad. My quotation is a part of Unicode Standar
Dave Korn wrote:
Haojun Bao wrote:
Bill McCormick wrote:
Bill McCormick wrote:
Bill McCormick wrote:
Hello,
There's something wrong with my man pager; it's producing garbage
output. My ~/.bashrc has these entries:
export MANPAGER='less -isrR'
export PAGER='less -r'
Hi, I also have the s
All resolved now!
* getopt_long(): "H. Peter Anvin" has provided Corrected
patch (the first one won't work). and the getopt_log links to cygwin now and
works well.
* recv(): the new snapshot has fixed the bug, and works fine.
now the tftp-hap-5.0 work well.
thank you all very much!
On Jun 15 11:22, Fr?d?ric Bron wrote:
> > To fix your application, call either
> >
> > struct ifconf ifc;
> > ifc.ifc_len = sizeof (struct ifreq) * 32;
> > ifc.ifc_buf = malloc (ifc.ifc_len);
> > if (ioctl (fd, SIOCGIFCONF, &ifc))
> > /* Resize ifc_buf and retry */
> > else
> > {
> >
> To fix your application, call either
>
> struct ifconf ifc;
> ifc.ifc_len = sizeof (struct ifreq) * 32;
> ifc.ifc_buf = malloc (ifc.ifc_len);
> if (ioctl (fd, SIOCGIFCONF, &ifc))
> /* Resize ifc_buf and retry */
> else
> {
> struct ifreq *ifr = ifc.ifc_req;
> struct ifreq ifr
On Jun 14 20:30, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> > The latest snapshot should eliminate the duplicate results.
>
> Works like a charm. Thank you for fixing this!
Same here. The weird hangs disappeared as well.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin
On Jun 14 22:18, IWAMURO Motonori wrote:
> 2009/6/13 Corinna Vinschen
> > The problem appears to be that there is no standard for the handling
> > of ambiguous characters.
>
> Yes, but the guideline exists.
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00444.html
A single mail in a single mailing lis
as to getopt_long(), this is the suggestion from "H. Peter Anvin"
=
The Right Thing would be to drop the conflicting functions from
their version of libiberty, and just have it naturally fall down to
libcygwin.
-hpa
=
--
Unsubscribe info:
26 matches
Mail list logo
