Re: seg fault produces stackdump with no stack trace

2009-04-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 02:28:49PM -0700, Tarmik wrote: >>I just checked in a fix which should keep the stack trace going even >>when it finds a return address of zero. > >>It will be in the next cygwin snapshot at: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ >>but be advised that this is a 1.7.x version of Cygwi

Re: seg fault produces stackdump with no stack trace

2009-04-10 Thread Tarmik
> I just checked in a fix which should keep the stack trace going even > when it finds a return address of zero. > It will be in the next cygwin snapshot at: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > but be advised that this is a 1.7.x version of Cygwin and there ar > changes to the way mounts are handled i

Re: [PATCH] rakudo Re: Parrot packaging problems

2009-04-10 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:05:50PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > 2009/4/10 Patrick R. Michaud : > > For some reason that doesn't sound quite right to me.  When converting > > rakudo to an executable, the pbc2exe we use should already know > > if it's being run using an installed parrot or some other

Re: [PATCH] rakudo Re: Parrot packaging problems

2009-04-10 Thread Reini Urban
2009/4/10 Patrick R. Michaud : > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:09:19AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >> leading to /usr/share/doc/rakudo-2009 and not rakudo-2009-03. >> I might be tempted to use rakudo-200903 as package name. > > We can change the releases to be the 200903 form if that's > much better.  B

Re: Bug in cygport __postinst

2009-04-10 Thread Charles Wilson
Yaakov wrote: > Does the attached patch for 0.9.5 work for you? Yes, that works. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cyg

Re: [PATCH] rakudo Re: Parrot packaging problems

2009-04-10 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:09:19AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > leading to /usr/share/doc/rakudo-2009 and not rakudo-2009-03. > I might be tempted to use rakudo-200903 as package name. We can change the releases to be the 200903 form if that's much better. But I personally much prefer the 2009-03

Re: [PATCH] rakudo Re: Parrot packaging problems

2009-04-10 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Reini Urban wrote: I also get lots of spectest failures of 2009-03 with parrot-1.0.0. See http://code.google.com/p/cygwin-rurban/source/browse/#svn/trunk/release/parrot/CYGWIN-PATCHES/rakudo-2009-03-1-check.log.gz I assume 2009-03 is targetting a newer parrot than 1.0.0, Correct. 2009-02 was

Re: [PATCH] rakudo Re: Parrot packaging problems

2009-04-10 Thread Reini Urban
@cygwin: About perl6-1.0, called rakudo-2009-03 2009/4/9 Patrick R. Michaud: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 09:00:54PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >> And attached is my rakudo-2009-03-1.src.patch to work from an installed >> parrot. > > I like this patch *very* much, I will likely apply it (with some min

Re: [1.7] deleting in-use directories

2009-04-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 10 04:41, Dave Korn wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Apr 9 16:13, Eric Blake wrote: > >> The Autoconf testsuite is failing several tests on cygwin 1.7 that used to > >> pass > >> on cygwin 1.5. I've traced it to the fact that 1.7 is trying to be > >> smarter > >> about deleting

FYI: A GraphicsMagick dll dependency fix

2009-04-10 Thread Norman Meyer
Greetings all, The Cygwin GraphicsMagick program has had library dependency issues for awhile. See http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-11/msg1.html as an example. Today I installed Cygwin and found another missing library. Here is how I resolved the problem. If a GraphicsMagick pro