Hello,
I followed this discussion, but does an ftp server exist with a
possibility to lock a user in its home directory preventing him to get
out of this "jail".
As I see this discussion I suppose that this is not possible. Seems that
someone needs to add this code to an ftp server.
Kind rega
Hi again,
I am afraid I have to ask for clarification again :(, I hope this is the last
time before I am on my own with this:
>
> No, you cannot hide it. It is created by Cygwin itself as a convenience
> to access the virtual 'cygdrive' directory. This is one of a number of
> virtual direct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new version of the asciidoc package, asciidoc 8.3.0-1, is now available
for download, replacing 8.2.7-1 as current.
NEWS:
=
This is a new upstream release, with upstream changes listed below. See
also the package documentation in /usr/share/doc
TheO wrote:
Many thanks for all your responses so far and I apologize if I
seem to be very persistent with my questions in this thread.
Maybe it's my fault to pose a such general question. Maybe I should
be more specific in my questions, asking many smaller targeted
questions instead of one b
>
>
>
Many thanks for all your responses so far and I apologize if I
seem to be very persistent with my questions in this thread.
Maybe it's my fault to pose a such general question. Maybe I should
be more specific in my questions, asking many smaller targeted
questions instead of one big on
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:18:07PM -0800, TheO wrote:
>I promise to help promote Cygwin in Windows community if I can find a
>way to make it as a secure SFTP server :). I am sure a lot of Windows
>users will prefer Cygwin to other commercial softwares.
I'm glad you're finding some use for Cygwin
TheO wrote:
Risk is exactly my main concern here.
I understand that in theory Cygwin, as a normal Win32 process, can't offer more
protection that what Windows can.
The thing is as a newbie in Cygwin, I don't know the exact inner working of
Cygwin. I
don't know what Cygwin does when it
>
> I understand. If SFTP under Cygwin fits your needs and you can live
> with the risks, then you should continue using it. I certainly don't
> understand your application or its requirements for communication but
> given your description above, it seems to me that 'scp' would serve your
> pur
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> Matthias Meyer wrote:
>
>> create a new file /etc/test.txt
>> bin>ls -alh /etc/test.txt
>> bin>-rwx--+ 1 meyer Kein 0 Dec 1 23:01 /etc/test.txt
>>
>> Than I run a backup:
>> After that my backup-protocol shows:
>> create 64418/544 0 etc/Test.tx
I am trying to automate my cygwin install on a windows 2003 box and have even
done the following before ssh-host-config is run:
ntrights +r SeAssignPrimaryTokenPrivilege -u sshd
ntrights +r SeCreateTokenPrivilege -u sshd
ntrights +r SeDenyInteractiveLogonRight -u sshd
ntrights +r SeDenyNetworkLo
>>In the event log the following message was found:
>
>>rsyncd: PID 1800: rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at
>>/home/lapo/packaging/rsync-3.0.4-1/src/rsync-3.0.4/clientserver.c(985)
>>[receiver=3.0.4].
>
> I downloaded the source, rebuilt and I am running under the debugger. The
> line indi
I am trying to automate my cygwin install on a windows 2003 box and have even
done the following before ssh-host-config is run:
ntrights +r SeAssignPrimaryTokenPrivilege -u sshd
ntrights +r SeCreateTokenPrivilege -u sshd
ntrights +r SeDenyInteractiveLogonRight -u sshd
ntrights +r SeDenyNetworkLo
TheO wrote:
If you're happy with the results, that's fine. However, you asked how
secure SFTP was. The answer is as I've said. Cygwin is not the O/S.
It cannot enforce restrictions on the O/S. Only the O/S can restrict
or grant access to users.
Thanks Larry,
The reason why Cygwin is ide
"Daniel B." wrote:
> Similarly, if you try "watch --interval=xx echo", you get no report
> that "xx" is not a valid number, or is not a valid interval value. It
> seems that option-parsing messages aren't getting printed out.
I get the usage summary displayed as a result of that comm
I'm a little rusty on CygWin bug reporting; where should I report the following?
The "watch" command isn't parsing some of its options correctly (as documented
in "man watch" and in its usage message, and as it works normally on Linux).
Additional, when it thinks there's a problem, it doesn't rep
On Dec 2 07:31, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Corinna Vinschen on 12/2/2008 5:08 AM:
> > - If find crashes in this situation, isn't this a bug in find which
> > should be fixed in find?
>
> No. The problem is that readdir() is returning t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Corinna Vinschen on 12/2/2008 5:08 AM:
> - If find crashes in this situation, isn't this a bug in find which
> should be fixed in find?
No. The problem is that readdir() is returning the same name twice, once
for a directory and once f
On Dec 2 14:38, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > - Do we really need d_type support in the registry? How often is that
> > actually used?
> >
>
> /proc/registry is probably rarely used, so d_type support is not
> important.
> But adding it would be trivial and the effect is
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> ...
>
> Some random thoughts:
>
> - Do we really need d_type support in the registry? How often is that
> actually used?
>
/proc/registry is probably rarely used, so d_type support is not
important.
But adding it would be trivial and the effect is significant:
Speed u
On Dec 1 21:16, Christian Franke wrote:
> When dirent.d_type support is added to /proc/registry (see attachment),
> find 4.4.0-3 crashes on keys with duplicate names.
>
> Testcases:
>
> $ find-with-d_type \
> /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/ALG/ISV
>
> $ find-with-d_type \
>
>
> Did you verify whether DOS paths, such as c:\, were also blocked?
>
No it's not blocked from Windows. if I log on locally, I can access /cygdrive/c
without any problem. But I can't using jailed SFTP, even if I use my
Administrator account.
>
> To repeat what we have already told you m
>
> If you're happy with the results, that's fine. However, you asked how
> secure SFTP was. The answer is as I've said. Cygwin is not the O/S.
> It cannot enforce restrictions on the O/S. Only the O/S can restrict
> or grant access to users.
>
Thanks Larry,
The reason why Cygwin is ideal
22 matches
Mail list logo
