I'm trying to compile a wonderful program ( command line ) to grab
videoes from youtube. It needs newt, a little utility. But when I try to
compile this utility I have the follewing errors :
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I../../..-I/usr/include/pyt
I've released bash_completion_lib-1.2.3 which is a fast alternative for
bash_completion. Features are:
- loads 5 times as fast as original bash_completion
- on-demand loading of completions
- automated testing with DejaGnu
It's a fairly new package, but if you're willing to put it to the test, se
Okay Larry,
I understand.
there used to be a page that I cant seem to find that had a list of
extra suggestions when installing perl, cpan, and expect module.
I cant seem to find that page.
I have a pretty good memory what was on it though.
Cheer,s
Noah
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Noah wr
Noah wrote:
Hi there,
is there a list of recommended apps to install upon initially installing
cygwin?
'setup.exe' will install a default set of apps that's considered a "good
base". You don't need to select any additional apps beyond that to have
a working Cygwin environment. But there is
Hi there,
is there a list of recommended apps to install upon initially installing
cygwin?
Cheers,
Noah
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:09:35AM -1000, safeeq wrote:
>If the program has bug then how come it is running on Xterm? This is
>where I get confuse
That is precisely what you need to debug. There is no reason to think
that a program will run the same way under xterm and as it does when it
is not
Thanks Faylor
If the program has bug then how come it is running on Xterm? This is where I
get confuse
~Safeeq
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:42:45AM -1000, safeeq wrote:
>This is first time I am sending an email on this group. Actually I am having
>a problem while executing a program written in C language and compiled using
>cygwin.
>This is the CFALGS I used while compiling
>
>DEFS = -DHAVE_X11?
>CFLAGS = -I
Aloha Cygwin users
This is first time I am sending an email on this group. Actually I am having
a problem while executing a program written in C language and compiled using
cygwin.
This is the CFALGS I used while compiling
DEFS = -DHAVE_X11
CFLAGS = -I/usr/X11R6/include
CC = cc
FLEX = /usr/bi
René Berber wrote:
> And you need Cywin/X running (the above library is for X windows) which is a
> lot
> more than a list of libraries.
Well, an X application can display itself on a different computer, so
the OP doesn't necessarilly need to run X on machine "B".
--
Fran
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:55:24PM +, Steve Waldo wrote:
>Thanks to all for your prompt replies! Much appreciated.
>
>I'm amazed that the stack trace is so wimpy.
You're right. The algorithm isn't really sophisticated but it shouldn't
be quite that bad.
I just checked in a fix which should k
Brian Dessent dessent.net> writes:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x in ?? ()
> #1 0x00401052 in letsCrash () at tc.c:4
> #2 0x00401083 in main () at tc.c:9
> (gdb)
Many thanks Brian! 'bt' was what I'd forgotten. Sorry about the newbie
mistake - I haven't used gdb in ages. I'm actually using 'ddd'
Steve Waldo wrote on 01 August 2008 18:55:
> The real crash is occurring too intermittently to catch it in the
> debugger.
You need the 'error_start' option of the CYGWIN environment variable;
check the cygwin user's guide for more info.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sig
Steve Waldo wrote:
> Even the debugger didn't know where it was anymore! It's obvious in this case
> why it went off in the weeds, but I would have thought the stack would still
> be accessible.
Well of *course* the debugger doesn't know what 0x is because
that is not a valid program loca
Thanks to all for your prompt replies! Much appreciated.
I'm amazed that the stack trace is so wimpy. All I did to trigger the example
was to add a call to this function to intentionally crash:
int letsCrash()
{
int (*myfunc)() = 0;
return myfunc();
}
With the debugger, it produces the fo
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:24:26PM +, Steve Waldo wrote:
>I've seen other postings that show stackdump examples that include the
>expected list of addresses in the stack trace. I'm not getting that
>list. When my app gets a seg fault it produces the expected stackdump
>file:
>
>[1]- Segmenta
Steve Waldo wrote:
> but the resulting file contains no stack trace:
>
> $ cat ResourceMgr.exe.stackdump
> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=
Right there you should see the problem. eip=0 means your program has
followed a null pointer and wandered off into lala land, so you
shou
Steve Waldo wrote on 01 August 2008 16:24:
> When my app gets a seg fault it produces the expected stackdump file:
>
> [1]- Segmentation fault (core dumped) ./ResourceMgr
>
> but the resulting file contains no stack trace:
> Is there a setting I'm missing somewhere?
Nah, it probably j
Hello,
I've seen other postings that show stackdump examples that include the
expected list of addresses in the stack trace. I'm not getting that list. When
my app gets a seg fault it produces the expected stackdump file:
[1]- Segmentation fault (core dumped) ./ResourceMgr
but the result
When I try to make Portable Cygwin running from USB, I using batch
script to install cygwin automatically and call sh script to make cygwin
user account. Unfortunately after several test and tunning my script
exited with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLANTION error and make system unstable.
When i try to run my
Cygwin regex.h implementation doesn't support some special sequences,
for example \< (beginning of word), \> (end of word) and \b (word
boundary). This causes a usability bug with the nano editor, which
uses these sequences extensively in most of its syntax highlighting
rules. For example, in /usr/
21 matches
Mail list logo
