Using gcc 3.4.4 on a redhat REL3 linux workstation, I can compile an
application with no errors, yet if I do the same over on the cygwin gcc
3.4.4, I get many errors. Since there are so many errors and the platform
is the only difference, I would like to verify that all libraries and linked
files
I am also getting hang on gnuplot.sh
I tried everything: run as administrator, setting the compatibility mode,
set the Windows PATH to include "C:\cygwin\bin" before running
setup.exe (via cmd shell), disabling UAC - nothing worked.
I would like to know how to re-run gnuplot.sh manually,
N
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.1-1.
Thank you very much. We have been waiting for this for a long time.
Best Regards,
Carlo
--
Carlo Florendo
Softare Engineer/Network Co-Administrator
Astra Philippines Inc.
UP-Ayala Technopark, Diliman 1101, Qu
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:33:02PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Given the confusion manifested in the recent cygwin mailing-list thread
>> about finding a file in the cygwin ftp directory called "setup.exe" and
>> assuming that it should be used for installing cyg
Dave Korn wrote:
> On 14 May 2007 22:46, A.M. Sabuncu wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>
> Todd: http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE. I have redirected this mail to
> the list.
>
>> I have a quick question re: Cygwin: when I installed Cygwin on Win XP, it
>> did not come w/ the gcc package - is this so
Markus E.L. wrote:
"Buchbinder,Barry(NIH/NIAID)[E]" writes:
Well -- that wasn't the topic with any of us. We know how to run setup
(all three ways: From cygwin.com, from the mirrors, from downloaded
copies, even from CDs). Do you take us for fools?
For sanity's sake, please stop this thread no
Hi Dave,
Markus E.L. writes:
> "DaveKorn" writes:
Rereading parts of the thread and your reply, I fear it happens again:
Lot's of reproaches in your's and Barry's replys, accusations of stuff
_I_ never wrote, down to questioning the legitimacy of addressing
features of any kind in any softwa
"DaveKorn" writes:
> On 15 May 2007 00:24, Markus E.L. wrote:
>
>> is concerned with questions of trust and
>> endorsement
>
> That's the underlying source of your error right there: a false assumption.
So Alex has been concerned with different questions? My apologies if I
read him wrong ther
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:33:02PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Given the confusion manifested in the recent cygwin mailing-list thread
>about finding a file in the cygwin ftp directory called "setup.exe" and
>assuming that it should be used for installing cygwin, I've removed
>setup.exe from
On 15 May 2007 00:24, Markus E.L. wrote:
> is concerned with questions of trust and
> endorsement
That's the underlying source of your error right there: a false assumption.
> (like: cygwin.com lists the mirrors as source of the
> software, then declines any responsibility for the actual cont
On 14 May 2007 22:46, A.M. Sabuncu wrote:
> Hi Dave,
Todd: http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE. I have redirected this mail to
the list.
> I have a quick question re: Cygwin: when I installed Cygwin on Win XP, it
> did not come w/ the gcc package - is this something that I need to do
> sepa
"Buchbinder,Barry(NIH/NIAID)[E]" writes:
> I understand that you are perturbed that setup does not behave as you
> might have expected.
Did you actually read what me or Alex wrote? Me seems none of us
expressed ANY perturbation with regard to that setup wouldn't behave
as expected or advertise
"Buchbinder,Barry(NIH/NIAID)[E]" writes:
Barry, my and (AFAI understand) Alex' problem is not with using setup
- I for my part am quite comfortable with how I start setup. Alex (in
my humble opinion rightly) is concerned with questions of trust and
endorsement (like: cygwin.com lists the mirror
Given the confusion manifested in the recent cygwin mailing-list thread
about finding a file in the cygwin ftp directory called "setup.exe" and
assuming that it should be used for installing cygwin, I've removed
setup.exe from the ftp download area at cygwin.com.
The "Install Cygwin Now!" link, wh
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Bob Heckel wrote:
> Why would using Cygwin's cp to copy a large file from one Windows XP
> box to another take 30 minutes but take only 10 minutes if I use drag
> 'n' drop (via Explorer)?
>
> I saw mention of speed in other posts but couldn't figure out if there
> was a soluti
On 05/14/2007, Markus E.L. wrote:
> "DaveKorn" writes:
>
> > > On 14 May 2007 21:27, Markus E.L. wrote:
> > >
> >> >> often. Did you mean setup.ini instead? But setup.ini is coming from
> >> >> the mirror, isn't it?
> > >
> > > Well, it comes from the mirror, same as the packages do, but it isn'
Alexander Sotirov wrote on Monday, May 14, 2007 3:23 PM:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> That + if you want to talk about trust then you should trust the
>> method that we advertise for installing cygwin which is to click on
>> the "Install Cygwin Now!" link.
>
> Are you saying that I should trust
"DaveKorn" writes:
> On 14 May 2007 21:27, Markus E.L. wrote:
>
>> often. Did you mean setup.ini instead? But setup.ini is coming from
>> the mirror, isn't it?
>
> Well, it comes from the mirror, same as the packages do, but it isn't
> generated there, if that's what you mean.
No, that wasn't
Hi,
I hope this is on topic for the list. The link to VNC at the page
mentioned in the subject
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
is broken. It seems www.uk.research.att.com has been dropped from the
DNS. Possible replacements:
- http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/vnc/index.h
On 14 May 2007 21:27, Markus E.L. wrote:
> often. Did you mean setup.ini instead? But setup.ini is coming from
> the mirror, isn't it?
Well, it comes from the mirror, same as the packages do, but it isn't
generated there, if that's what you mean.
> (And this is a serious question: If it comes
"LarryHall(Cygwin)" writes:
> Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> It was actually all academic before since: 1) there was nothing wrong
>>> with the setup.exe on the mirrors and 2) people shouldn't have been
>>> running setup.exe from the mirrors to begin with.
>>
>> Can yo
Christopher Faylor writes:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 03:13:58PM +0200, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
>>Brian Dessent writes:
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
Please anyone touch setup.exe? If the mirrors pick it up then we (you!
:) know that it is, somehow, a time stamping issue. The issue c
"LarryHall(Cygwin)" writes:
> Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> That + if you want to talk about trust then you should trust the method
>>> that we advertise for installing cygwin which is to click on the
>>> "Install Cygwin Now!" link.
>>
>> Are you saying that I should
On 14 May 2007 20:23, Alexander Sotirov wrote:
> Even if I download setup.exe from cygwin.com, it still fetches the package
> data from a mirror. As far as I know the package data is not signed, so
> setup.exe cannot verify that is has not been tampered with. If a mirror has
> a modified bash pack
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 03:50:16PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>That + if you want to talk about trust then you should trust the method
>>>that we advertise for installing cygwin which is to click on the
>>>"Install Cygwin Now!" link.
>
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:23:09PM -0700, Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>That + if you want to talk about trust then you should trust the method
>>that we advertise for installing cygwin which is to click on the
>>"Install Cygwin Now!" link.
>
>Are you saying that I should tr
Alexander Sotirov wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> That + if you want to talk about trust then you should trust the method
>> that we advertise for installing cygwin which is to click on the
>> "Install Cygwin Now!" link.
>
> Are you saying that I should trust setup.exe downloaded from cygwin
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> That + if you want to talk about trust then you should trust the method
> that we advertise for installing cygwin which is to click on the
> "Install Cygwin Now!" link.
Are you saying that I should trust setup.exe downloaded from cygwin.com more
than setup.exe downloade
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:06:27PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> It was actually all academic before since: 1) there was nothing wrong
>>> with the setup.exe on the mirrors and 2) people shouldn't have been
>>> running setup.exe from th
Alexander Sotirov wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> It was actually all academic before since: 1) there was nothing wrong
>> with the setup.exe on the mirrors and 2) people shouldn't have been
>> running setup.exe from the mirrors to begin with.
>
> Can you elaborate on why people shouldn't ru
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> It was actually all academic before since: 1) there was nothing wrong
> with the setup.exe on the mirrors and 2) people shouldn't have been
> running setup.exe from the mirrors to begin with.
Can you elaborate on why people shouldn't run setup.exe from the mirrors? I
do
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:35 AM
Subject: CRON problems
| Hi,
|
| I have process scheduling my tasks under cygwin unsing CRON. I have
| started the cron service by running the script usr/bin/cron-config.
|
| cron_diagnose.sh reports zero errors. ps
I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.1-1.
This is an update to the new upstream version 7.1. Cygwin Vim
still builds from the vanilla sources.
The official release message:
===
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) ver
On Apr 20 12:24, fergus wrote:
> I'm having a few problems with sed -i (using the current sed v.4.1.5).
>
> Unfortunately they only occur when used in a system() call from within a
> program. That is to say
>
> $ /bin/sed -i 's/expr1/expr2/g' {pathto}/filename
>
> works fine, but
>
>
* Corinna Vinschen (Mon, 14 May 2007 14:18:35 +0200)
> On May 11 19:24, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * (Fri, 11 May 2007 19:25:01 +0200)
> > > Actually I seriously resent that you trying to portrait me as a fool
> > > who doesn't know what he doing. That coming from a visible member of
> > > the Cygw
On Apr 28 11:47, Mihai Anitescu wrote:
> Hi all,
> The problem is similar to the one outlined in the thread of
> http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2007-03/msg00671.html
> but I could not find the answer.
>
> I have attached the strace and cygcheck -srv outputs.
> SSH_AUTH_SOCK and SSH_AGENT_PID ar
On May 14 09:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:13:28AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >According to Christopher Faylor on 5/14/2007 6:53 AM:
> >>>Does cygwin care about providing reentrant versions of functions?
> >>>There is precedent for doing this: as an example, cygwin.din
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:13:28AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>According to Christopher Faylor on 5/14/2007 6:53 AM:
>>>Does cygwin care about providing reentrant versions of functions?
>>>There is precedent for doing this: as an example, cygwin.din already
>>>exports asprintf_r.
>>
>>That was probab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 5/14/2007 6:53 AM:
>> Does cygwin care about providing reentrant versions of functions?
>> There is precedent for doing this: as an example, cygwin.din already
>> exports asprintf_r.
>
> That was probably one of many
> Harry Rockefeller writes:
> Most of the internal "compiled Lisp functio" commands work
> correctly, but standard UNIX commands don't.
> Here is an example:
> /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/harryr $ w
> Opening input file: No such file or directory, /usr/bin/w
> /cygdrive/c/DOC
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:47:27AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>According to Christopher Faylor on 5/14/2007 6:25 AM:
>>Why do we need to export *vdprintf_r at all? Does some standard define
>>it?
>
>Does cygwin care about providing reentrant versions of functions?
>There is precedent for doing this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 5/14/2007 6:25 AM:
> Why do we need to export *vdprintf_r at all? Does some standard define it?
Does cygwin care about providing reentrant versions of functions? There
is precedent for doing this: as an example, cy
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:22:54AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>According to Corinna Vinschen on 5/14/2007 6:12 AM:
>>> _Exit
>>> dprintf
>>>
>>> There is also a big list of integer-only and reentrant variants of *printf
>>> that
>>> might be worth e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Corinna Vinschen on 5/14/2007 6:12 AM:
>> _Exit
>> dprintf
>>
>> There is also a big list of integer-only and reentrant variants of *printf
>> that
>> might be worth exporting:
>>
>> asiprintf, _asiprintf, asiprintf_r, _asiprintf_r, dipr
On May 14 13:02, Ronald Fischer wrote:
> I installed ruby for cygwin, using the cygwin setup program:
>
> $ ruby --version
> ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i386-cygwin]
>
>
> To my surprise, this does not install the "gem" command, which is
> normally part of Ruby 1.8.5:
gem is not part
On May 11 19:24, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * (Fri, 11 May 2007 19:25:01 +0200)
> > Actually I seriously resent that you trying to portrait me as a fool
> > who doesn't know what he doing. That coming from a visible member of
> > the Cygwin project will certainly keep any others from giving any
> > u
On May 7 17:04, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:41:28AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I've been watching the groups, Google, and so forth with little luck to
> >resolving the issue seen by myself and a few other people:
> >
> >$ rlogin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 9617 [mai
On May 2 13:03, Shankar Unni wrote:
> Shankar Unni wrote:
>
> >I finally got a bit of a clue during a recent login. It seems that
> >*occasionally*, my machine is able to contact the PDC when logging in
> >via sshd, so that LOGONSERVER is \\pdcname, rather than
> >\\localmachinename (using cac
On May 2 17:19, Ravi Agrawal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using cygwin 1.5.24. After running vshadow
> i get a snapshot. To access that snapshot i get a
> string "\\?\GLOBALROOT\.. But when i try to mount
> //?/GLOBALROOT... /dump_mount it says me invalid
> argument. After doing some resea
On May 1 22:55, Eric Blake wrote:
> I noticed a couple of functions that cause link errors even though they are
> required by POSIX (or at least will be required by the next version of
> POSIX),
> implemented by newlib, and declared in the headers:
>
> _Exit
> dprintf
>
> There is also a big
On Apr 27 12:58, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Has Cygwin 1.5.24-2 and XP.
>
> A program creates local domain socket. If S_IRUSR bit is
> removed from the socket file, then this file is converted to a
> regular file.
This is a chicken-egg problem, sort of. The fact that the file
rep
On Apr 19 11:01, Mark Riley wrote:
> After having problems with rsync (2.6.6) hanging while pushing files
> to a Cygwin machine over ssh, I searched the lists here and found
> that many other users were experiencing the same problem. While
> some solutions seemed to mitigate the problem, there are
I installed ruby for cygwin, using the cygwin setup program:
$ ruby --version
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i386-cygwin]
To my surprise, this does not install the "gem" command, which is
normally part of Ruby 1.8.5:
$ which ruby
/usr/bin/ruby
$ ls /usr/bin/gem
ls: cannot access /usr/bi
53 matches
Mail list logo
