WinXP SP2, cygwin 5.19 snapshot
Once I grabbed the latest cygwin snapshot and made sure I had the
coreutils 5.9xxx, I could finally use stty to set the baud of my
built-in COM port, but it does not work for my USB serial adaptors. Any
ideas?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#u
Siegfried Heintze wrote:
I'm stuck. Can someone please point me to the documentation?
There is not much more included as you can find in
/usr/share/doc/gnome-keyring-0.4.5/
Other Gnome applications hold their docs under /usr/share/gtk-doc where
it may be accessed by the Gnome help browser, ho
Siegfried Heintze wrote:
[snip]
> I'm stuck. Can someone please point me to the documentation?
/usr/share/doc/Cygwin/gnome-keyring-0.4.5.README
--
René Berber
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation
I'm poking around in c:/cygwin/usr/share/doc/gnome-keyring-0.4.3 trying to
understand how to use this program called keyring.
Can I expect all Cygwin utilities to be already compiled and have a file
that contains a URL to the documentation?
I could google for it, but I wanted to be assured that
Brian Dessent dessent.net> writes:
> What I was trying to emphasize is that passing "COM4" to open() in a
> Cygwin program sets you up for a world of hurt...
>
> Brian
It's even worse than you think. In this case...COM4 is not even a real serial
port...but a "virtual" serial port constructed b
Brian Dessent wrote:
> Generation of the short name from the long name is not even not
> guaranteed to exist or work.
s/not even not guaranteed/not even guaranteed/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documenta
zzapper wrote:
> $ cygpath -d c:/Program\ Files/Internet\ Explorer
> c:\PROGRA~1\INTERN~1
>
> I've just had another case where the I had to use the short form, is the
> short form the "real name"?
Huh? What do you mean? Does the short form uniquely identify the
file? Yes, of course. But onl
Todd Rearick wrote:
> > > #define OUTPUT_DEVICE "COM4"
> >
> > *cough*
>
> Like I said. I'm not having a problem with output. The program fails even
> when I run it with the options "-x -d"in this case, COM4 is never even
> opened..and no attempts are made to write to it. All the program
Hi
$ cygpath -d c:/Program\ Files/Internet\ Explorer
c:\PROGRA~1\INTERN~1
I've just had another case where the I had to use the short form, is the short
form the "real name"?
--
zzapper
Success for Techies and Vim,Zsh tips
http://SuccessTheory.com/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.co
On Oct 22 11:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 21 16:18, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > > * Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-17 23:34:52 +0200]:
> > >
> > > Never mind, I've changed it in CVS. Note that msg_control,
> > > msg_controllen and msg_flags members are still without function.
>
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:37:46AM -0700, estech users wrote:
>But is there any advantage of using GCC over MS products when it comes
>to the issue of security?
No.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentat
estech users wrote:
But is there any advantage of using GCC over MS
products when it comes to the issue of security?
If you find a security problem in GCC you may fix it yourself.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http
Eric Blake wrote:
I don't know if you are reproducing the same problem as the OP, since the
OP didn't exactly print what error message he was getting, but you
certainly reproduced a problem.
...
This is probably because you've mounted / as textmode. I don't know if it
is a bug in info or
Dear Sir,
Thanks for yours.
But is there any advantage of using GCC over MS
products when it comes to the issue of security?
Best wishes,
Olorunfemi, Temitope
--- Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to estech users on 10/22/20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Arend-Jan Westhoff on 10/22/2005 7:02 AM:
>>It works for me. You'll have to help by giving me a better formula for
>>reproducing the problem. What does "info -w bash" print? Also, could you
>>please follow the problem-reporting directio
Hi,
I've downloaded the latest snapshot, it works now, everything fine.
Thanks for the help.
Sebastian
What happens is that Cygwin reports the *real* CPU type, which is a 64
bit type, instead of the emulated 32 bit type it's running on (i686
inside of WOW64).
This is fixed in recent develope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to estech users on 10/22/2005 3:19 AM:
> Dear all,
>
> Please can you enlighten me on why it is more
> advantageous to use gcc rather that Microsoft
> studio.net visual c ?
1) gcc is free, Microsoft is not (even if you can obtain a copy wit
On Oct 22 14:58, Todd Rearick wrote:
> Todd Rearick cox.net> writes:
> > Thanks for all of your help. Unfortunately...now the problem isn't really
> > directly under my control...hope I can find a solution.
>
> HAHA!!! I'm such an idiot. [...]
No worries, me too. Thanks to your report I was
Todd Rearick cox.net> writes:
> Thanks for all of your help. Unfortunately...now the problem isn't really
> directly under my control...hope I can find a solution.
>
HAHA!!! I'm such an idiot. I have firewall software running on the 2 PC's
that don't work (Norton Internet Security). When
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> This I can't tell you since I don't know the server side of the
> connection. It's normal to get EOF (== 0) over and over again if EOF
> has been detected. This behaviour can be observed on, for instance,
> Linux, too.
Well..I thought it shouldn't if i
On Oct 22 13:31, Todd Rearick wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > What you're entirely missing at this point is the fact that a return
> > value of 0 (zero) indicates EOF. You don't test for this. Instead
> > you're also testing errno in case of EOF, which has no meaning in this
>
* marco (2005-10-21 19:27 +0100)
> i can not run any python scripts with dos lineendings.
Works for me. Probably a classical "Problem exists between chair and
computer" issue?
> if i run such scripts i get stupid syntax error messages from python.
But you forgot to tell us this "stupid syntax er
Brian Dessent dessent.net> writes:
>
> > #define OUTPUT_DEVICE "COM4"
>
> *cough*
>
>
Like I said. I'm not having a problem with output. The program fails even
when I run it with the options "-x -d"in this case, COM4 is never even
opened..and no attempts are made to write to it.
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> On Oct 22 07:06, Todd Rearick wrote:
> > while(1)
> > {
> > char buf[80];
> > int len;
> >
> > len = recv(infd,buf,1,0);
> >
> > if (len < 1)
> > {
> > printf("len = %d\n",len);
> >
Marco,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:27:12PM +0200, marco wrote:
> i can not run any python scripts with dos lineendings.
> if i run such scripts i get stupid syntax error messages from python.
Sorry, but I can't reproduce your problem.
> what can i do to run these scripts without changing the line
Dear all,
Please can you enlighten me on why it is more
advantageous to use gcc rather that Microsoft
studio.net visual c ?
Thank you.
Best wishes,
Olorunfemi, Temitope
--- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ugh, top-posting... Reformatted.
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, estech users
On Oct 21 20:05, Sebastian Tillmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile ClanLib with Cygwin on my Windows XP Professional
> x64 Edition. [...]
>
> $ ./configure --enable-static --disable-shared
> checking build system type... ./config.guess: unable to guess system type
What happens is that C
On Oct 21 16:18, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > * Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-17 23:34:52 +0200]:
> >
> > Never mind, I've changed it in CVS. Note that msg_control,
> > msg_controllen and msg_flags members are still without function.
>
> that's OK, as long as they are there.
>
> whil
On Oct 22 07:06, Todd Rearick wrote:
> while(1)
> {
> char buf[80];
> int len;
>
> len = recv(infd,buf,1,0);
>
> if (len < 1)
> {
> printf("len = %d\n",len);
> printf("errno = %d\n",errno);
>
Todd Rearick wrote:
> #define OUTPUT_DEVICE "COM4"
*cough*
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Brian Dessent dessent.net> writes:
>
> Your test case does not compile...
...good point...I was just trying to cut down on the length of the post...but
it really didn't save that much anyway...I'll attach the full code on the end
of this post in case anyone wants to try it.
>
> Is there any
31 matches
Mail list logo
