Re: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Eric Blake wrote: > > I have noted only that the /dev directory does not appear in root (/): > > Do you not read the ChangeLogs? > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/winsup-changelog-20050909-20050912 > * fhandler_disk_file.cc (fhandler_disk_file::readdir): Temporarily > remove

Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:28:50PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Can you tell me if it is a regression from 2005-09-12? I think I probably found the cause for this and the other rxvt problem. I seem to have duplicated something similar on my non-hyperthreading system. Stupid hyperthreading..

Re: Output of uname -s

2005-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Larry Finger on 9/13/2005 9:25 PM: > I know that 'uname -s' yields 'CYGWIN_NT-5.1' on Windows XP, but I am > writing a multi-platform makefile and need to find a method that will > work for all versions of Windows. What is the result of un

Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:42:46PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >True, 1.5.18 had the same problem, but 1.5.17 did not. So it just depends >on how far back you were looking before calling it a regression :) Does this ring a bell? "If you think you've found an error, please indicate whether this is a

Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
from /bin/cygwin1.dbg... done. done. (gdb) l *0x610f30d3 0x610f30d3 is at /netrel/src/cygwin-snapshot-20050913-1/winsup/cygserver/client.cc:464. 461/* Don't retry every request if the server's not there */ 462if (cygserver_running == CYGSERVER_UNAVAIL) 463 { 464

Output of uname -s

2005-09-13 Thread Larry Finger
I know that 'uname -s' yields 'CYGWIN_NT-5.1' on Windows XP, but I am writing a multi-platform makefile and need to find a method that will work for all versions of Windows. What is the result of uname -s for Windows 9X, Me, NT and 2K? Thanks, Larry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.c

Re: tcsh can't find executables in Path with "wrong" case

2005-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
> It's clearly something to do with the path hashing, as unhashing fixes > this problem (typing "unhash" at the command prompt). And "bash" > doesn't seem to have this problem (I guess it doesn't hash things). Just to avoid the spread of misinformation, bash also does hashing, but it doesn't tr

Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:24:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:12:16PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>Potential types of problems in today's snapshot would be processes which >>>seem to exit but don't really or processes which hang wh

Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:12:16PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>Potential types of problems in today's snapshot would be processes which >>seem to exit but don't really or processes which hang when they are >>supposed to be exiting. You may need to do a "ps -W" to se

Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: Potential types of problems in today's snapshot would be processes which seem to exit but don't really or processes which hang when they are supposed to be exiting. You may need to do a "ps -W" to see if processes are still hanging around. While running the libtool t

tcsh can't find executables in Path with "wrong" case

2005-09-13 Thread Shankar Unni
Just a reiteration of http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2001-09/msg00499.html, I guess. One of the executables in my PATH is called "EXP.EXE" (in that exact case). When I type just "exp", tcsh can't locate it. It can if I type "EXP". It's clearly something to do with the path hashing, as unhash

Cygwin build system SOOOO SLOOOWWWW ???

2005-09-13 Thread Steve Johnson
Greetings To All, We've been using Cygwin for many years to host our software build system on Win32. The system is built on top of gmake. We use the same gmake system on MacOSX, Linux, and Solaris. Building under Cygwin has always been slower than on true *nix platforms. This is expec

RE: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Configures and builds cvs wxWidgets here with no observed problems. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://

Error in setup.ini-20050913_23:01?

2005-09-13 Thread Angelo Graziosi
In setup.ini there is: @ _update-info-dir sdesc: "Generate info/dir file automatically" category: _PostInstallLast requires: texinfo bash version: 00308-1 install: release/_update-info-dir/_update-info-dir-00309-1.tar.bz2 373 3e583f639de35fae1578b92a5e439ee1 source: release/_update-info-dir/_up

Re: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
> > I have noted only that the /dev directory does not appear in root (/) : Do you not read the ChangeLogs? http://cygwin.com/snapshots/winsup-changelog-20050909-20050912 * fhandler_disk_file.cc (fhandler_disk_file::readdir): Temporarily remove insertion of /dev into root directory. In s

Re: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Angelo Graziosi
I am trying the snap 20050913 (uname -a: 20050913 15:38:54) on W2K SP4 and it seems to work fine (in particular, no problems with RXVT). I have noted only that the /dev directory does not appear in root (/) : $ ls -lrt / total 754 drwxrwxrwx+ 19 Administrator Users4096 Apr

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: subversion-1.2.3-1 (new -apache2, -perl, -book subpackages)

2005-09-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Subversion, a version control system which aims to be a compelling replacement for CVS, has been updated in the Cygwin net distribution to version 1.2.3-1. This is a new upstream patch release. There are also notable additions to the Cygwin packaging: * New package subversion-apache2, containin

Re: AMD64

2005-09-13 Thread Brian Dessent
lavmart wrote: > Will Cygwin run under Win64 beta? Yes but you will probably have to use a recent snapshot. > Will gcc currently in Cygwin produce AMD64 object > code and executables No, gcc does not support x64 under windows. Nor does binutils, AFAIK. If you want to generate 64 bit code you

Re: AMD64

2005-09-13 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 lavmart wrote: > Will Cygwin run under Win64 beta? It already does, using WOW64 of course. > Will gcc currently > in Cygwin produce AMD64 object code and executables > (command-line only, I want to run some benchmarks...?) This, I'm not sure. My bes

Re: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:18:08PM +0200, Ralf Beck wrote: >This is a report regarding cygwin1.dll >version "1.5.19" BuildDate "2005-09-13 15:40": > >In my .bash_profile I am using: > > keychain --quiet ~/.ssh/id_rsa > . ~/.keychain/${HOSTNAME}-sh > >I am also starting rxvt.exe with: > > D:\cygw

Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:55:46AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >According to Christopher Faylor on 9/12/2005 4:27 PM: >> I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. >> The snapshot that is currently available should be very c

Re: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Ralf Beck
ygwin mount registry name: mounts v2 Cygdrive flags: cygdrive flags Cygdrive prefix: cygdrive prefix Cygdrive default prefix: Build date: Tue Sep 13 15:40:28 EDT 2005 Snapshot date: 20050913-15:38:54 Shared id: cygwin1S4 243k 2005/02/23 D:\cygwin\usr\X11R

AMD64

2005-09-13 Thread lavmart
Will Cygwin run under Win64 beta? Will gcc currently in Cygwin produce AMD64 object code and executables (command-line only, I want to run some benchmarks...?) TIA, Oliver J. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html

Re: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Christopher Faylor on 9/12/2005 4:27 PM: > I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. > The snapshot that is currently available should be very close to an > official release of cygwin version 1.5.19. On Win98,

Re: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Charles Wilson
Looks ok here. Did a full bootstrap, build, and testsuite of libtool-HEAD with no unexpected occurances. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

RE: testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release

2005-09-13 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Christopher Faylor >Sent: 12 September 2005 23:27 > I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. Looks good. Been running multiple large complex builds in parallel and no problems so far. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a

RE: Setup 2.510.2.2 failure

2005-09-13 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Arthur I Schwarz >Sent: 12 September 2005 21:34 > And for: Basically vast swathes of X. I've seen this too. I haven't understood the problem yet, but like I said the best workaround is to rename aside or delete the files; you may end up unnecessarily re-downloa

RE: rm problem: Directory not empty

2005-09-13 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: James R. Phillips >Sent: 12 September 2005 19:30 Sorry that this is off-topic, but it comes up often enough in the context of this general discussion to be worth mentioning. > I've also seen badly behaving windows programs, which refuse to "let go" > of a directo

Re: rm problem: Directory not empty

2005-09-13 Thread Andrew DeFaria
Larry Hall wrote: At 02:29 PM 9/12/2005, you wrote: I've also seen badly behaving windows programs, which refuse to "let go" of a directory once they have used a file in it, until the program is explicitly closed. This is most annoying, as you have to keep closing program windows until suddenl