sshd install problems | WinXP Pro system

2005-09-10 Thread Evan Cooch
After 2-3 hours googling for insights, and thoroughly reading what was available, I've decided to stop beating my head against the wall, and ask here. Basically, trying to get sshd installed as a service under WinXP Pro -SP2. Trying the install as a user who has full admin privelages on the s

installer: select packages: text background color

2005-09-10 Thread Daniel Convissor
-- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml

Re: GPG got problems with external EXEs?

2005-09-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Sep 10 11:02, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> % gpg --recv-key >> 3 [main] gpg 4884 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: WARNING: >> VirtualProtectEx to return to previous state in parent failed for >> MAP_PRIVATE address 0x214, Win

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: sharutils-4.5.2-1

2005-09-10 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A new release of sharutils, 4.5.2-1, is available. NEWS: = This is a new alpha upstream release, with a new maintainer. However, the previous stable release had a bug that made unshar unusable. Upstream changes since the previous version, 4.4-1,

Re: GPG got problems with external EXEs?

2005-09-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 10 11:02, Lapo Luchini wrote: > % gpg --recv-key > 3 [main] gpg 4884 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: WARNING: > VirtualProtectEx to return to previous state in parent failed for > MAP_PRIVATE address 0x214, Win32 error 87 >6469 [main] gpg 4884 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: WARNING:

Re: GPG got problems with external EXEs?

2005-09-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 10 12:09, Lapo Luchini wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Very unlikely. All 32 bit processes are running invariably in WOW64. > > Just a wild guess, I know almost nothing of the WOW64 subsystem (yet) > > > Please try a recent Cygwin

Re: GPG got problems with external EXEs?

2005-09-10 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Very unlikely. All 32 bit processes are running invariably in WOW64. Just a wild guess, I know almost nothing of the WOW64 subsystem (yet) > Please try a recent Cygwin snapshot. I applied a WOW64 related patch > on 2005-08

RE: file not working on executables?

2005-09-10 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
[snip] > > Again, I 100% share the notion that text mounts should not > be necessary. > > But when even such basic apps as tar get this wrong, I simply don't > > see how anybody can realistically entertain the idea that > eliminating > > them will somehow solve any problems. > > You're a lucky

Re: GPG got problems with external EXEs?

2005-09-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 10 11:02, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Warning: I have Windows XP x64, I wonder of it *may* be a problem like > the main EXE is launched correctly in WOW64 by the OS and the inner one > is not? Uhm. Very unlikely. All 32 bit processes are running invariably in WOW64. Please try a recent Cygwin s

GPG got problems with external EXEs?

2005-09-10 Thread Lapo Luchini
% gpg --recv-key 3 [main] gpg 4884 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: WARNING: VirtualProtectEx to return to previous state in parent failed for MAP_PRIVATE address 0x214, Win32 error 87 6469 [main] gpg 4884 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: WARNING: VirtualProtect to copy protection to child fail