Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:38:58AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: We would like to release

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:38:58AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: We would like to release 1.5.17 soon. Plea

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:22:13PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:17:48AM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> >> Program exited normally. >>> >> (gdb) >>> > >>> >Well, that's the funny thing about Cygwin's gdb. >>> >>>No, that's the funny

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:17:48AM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >> Program exited normally. >> >> (gdb) >> > >> >Well, that's the funny thing about Cygwin's gdb. >> >>No, that's the funny thing about debugging in general. There's nothing >>special about cygwin's

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Program exited normally. > >> (gdb) > > > >Well, that's the funny thing about Cygwin's gdb. > > No, that's the funny thing about debugging in general. There's nothing > special about cygwin's gdb. Really? I'd expect something more like this: (gdb) run Starting pr

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:38:58AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>> Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >>We would like to release 1

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:28:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote: >Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >> >> Ah, and the funny thing, it works well when running under gdb: >> >> This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"... >> (gdb) run -svr >> Starting program: /usr/bin/cygcheck.exe -svr >> warning: LDR: Auto

Re: *** system shared memory version mismatch detected

At 06:09 PM 5/19/2005, you wrote: >Larry Hall wrote: > >] If you didn't reboot. Try that. If you still have the problem, double check >] that you don't have any other 'cygwin1.dll's. 'cygwin1.dll' is, >] unfortunately, distributed with a large number of 3rd party apps, including >] things like

Re: CPIO with solaris 9 flash archives

On Wed, 18 May 2005, Clemson, Chris wrote: Hi everyone! I'm trying to get cygwin cpio to view/extract a flash archive made on solaris 9. According to the docs, a flash archive is just a cpio archive. Reading the during the solaris install works fine, but I am having trouble getting cygwin cpio to

RE: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem

On Thu, 19 May 2005, Mcdougall, Robert A. wrote: > "m. z." wrote: > > BTAM, the wizards will not reply to such naive questions as > yours or mine. FWIW, here's what I've found out: > > > Why doing "latex" is invoking now pdf format ? > > According to the teTeX manual ('doc/tetex/TETEXDOC.{dvi,pd

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > Ah, and the funny thing, it works well when running under gdb: > > This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"... > (gdb) run -svr > Starting program: /usr/bin/cygcheck.exe -svr > warning: LDR: Automatic DLL Relocation in cygcheck.exe > > warning: LDR: Dll GDI32.dll base

Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv

On Thu, 19 May 2005, Brian Dessent wrote: > (I realize this list is technically only for patches on cygwin, but > cygrunsrv is close enough...) Replying to the main Cygwin list. > I've implemented some new features for cygrunsrv that I think might be > useful to people. Examples follow. First

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: We would like to release 1.5.17 soon. Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ [...] Please test

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: We would like to release 1.5.17 soon. Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ [...] Please test, Corinna I tried the

Re: [patch] update documentation Was: cygwin-host-setup does not install sshd

On 5/18/05, Brian Dessent wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > Alright. I am not sure how to push out the new version to the web site, > > > so someone else will have to do that (or tell me what to do - check in > > > the .html files into the website CVS or something?) > > > > Yep. cvs -d :e

Re: *** system shared memory version mismatch detected

Christopher Faylor wrote: >Brian Dessent wrote: Check the mailing list archives, I think there were some recent issues relating to the way the DLL handled interlocking on initialization that led to spurious cygheap mismatch errors. Or just try a snapshot. That would only happen when multiple cygw

Re: *** system shared memory version mismatch detected

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:15:29PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Giulio Ardoino wrote: > >> As I said I already did a full search, in every drive and >> \cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll >> is the only cygwin dll I have. Tried rebooting but no luck. >> >> Again, this wasn't happening before upgrading to 1.5

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >>>We would like to release 1.5.17 soon. >>> >>>Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from >>>http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ >> >> >>[...] >> >>>Please test, >>>Corinna >> >>

Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:43:14PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On May 19 14:38, Brian Dessent wrote: >> Do you think the idea of having cygcheck include the --list --verbose >> output is worthwhile? I'll see to doing that if it's agreeable. > >Definitely. cygcheck mustn't rely on cygrunsrv be

RE: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 2:59 PM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem [tetex maintainer -- please respond] > Jan, can you provide any insight here? Apologies if this is unnecessary, but b

Re: gnu c++ linker errors on double processor machine

Bernd Prager wrote: Hi everybody, I'm experencing an odd error on a double processor machine. The same source code compiles well on all boxes I used but on a single machine it fails. It's the only 2-processor box I use. That's why I assume the problem is some weird concurrency issue but I'm not s

Re: *** system shared memory version mismatch detected

Giulio Ardoino wrote: > As I said I already did a full search, in every drive and > \cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll > is the only cygwin dll I have. Tried rebooting but no luck. > > Again, this wasn't happening before upgrading to 1.5.16-1. I don't know > if that's the fault or if it's something it does

Re: gnu c++ linker errors on double processor machine

Bernd Prager wrote: > /usr/local/lib/libstdc++.a(tree.o) > > (.text$_ZSt20_Rb_tree_rotate_leftPSt18_Rb_tree_node_baseRS0_+0x0): > ... > Cfg.o(.text$_ZSt20_Rb_tree_rotate_leftPSt18_Rb_tree_node_baseRS0_ > [std::_Rb_tree_rotate_left(std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, > std::_Rb_tree_node_base*&)]+0x0):/usr

Re: *** system shared memory version mismatch detected

Larry Hall wrote: ] If you didn't reboot. Try that. If you still have the problem, double check ] that you don't have any other 'cygwin1.dll's. 'cygwin1.dll' is, ] unfortunately, distributed with a large number of 3rd party apps, including ] things like clamwin and many video editing/capturing

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: We would like to release 1.5.17 soon. Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ [...] Please test, Corinna I tried the snapshot from 2005-05-19 and my postgres problems are fixed now (was broken after the upgrade

gnu c++ linker errors on double processor machine

Hi everybody, I'm experencing an odd error on a double processor machine. The same source code compiles well on all boxes I used but on a single machine it fails. It's the only 2-processor box I use. That's why I assume the problem is some weird concurrency issue but I'm not sure. When I try to

Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv

On May 19 14:38, Brian Dessent wrote: > Do you think the idea of having cygcheck include the --list --verbose > output is worthwhile? I'll see to doing that if it's agreeable. Definitely. cygcheck mustn't rely on cygrunsrv being available, but if it is, it's -L -V output is valuable system confi

Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I really like this patch, cool stuff. However, I have two nits. > > First, your patch adds new options, so it should also add some wording to > cygrunsrv.README. > > On May 19 12:25, Brian Dessent wrote: > > for S in `cygrunsrv -L`; do cygrunsrv -E $S; done > > > > If

Re: tail -f and pipes with bash shell

On 19/05/05, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2005, Dave Korn wrote: > > Amusingly enough, those were still both legitimate email addresses even > > after he X'd them out! oops. > That's why one ought to X out the top-level suffix too. I don't believe > .XXX is a valid suffix. Or

Re: IPPROTO_IP is not a macro

On May 19 09:40, Sam Steingold wrote: > : > The header shall define the following macros for use as > values of the level argument of getsockopt() and setsockopt(): > > IPPROTO_IP > Internet protocol. > etc > > cygwin

Re: *** system shared memory version mismatch detected

At 02:36 PM 5/19/2005, you wrote: >I get this error right after upgrading to 1.5.16-1. I did a full search >on my computer and \cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll is the only one I have. >I even deleted / reinstalled cygwin but no luck. >Weird, could it be because of corrupted registry settings? I've been >us

Re: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:51:55PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor wrote: >Well, I think the problem is due to cygwin/Windows limitation: you can't >have a link named latex that points to pdfetex.exe >But correct me if I'm not right. "You're not right" cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#

Re: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem

Well, I think the problem is due to cygwin/Windows limitation: you can't have a link named latex that points to pdfetex.exe But correct me if I'm not right. Bert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation

Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv

Hi Brian, I really like this patch, cool stuff. However, I have two nits. First, your patch adds new options, so it should also add some wording to cygrunsrv.README. On May 19 12:25, Brian Dessent wrote: > for S in `cygrunsrv -L`; do cygrunsrv -E $S; done > > If a service name contains spaces

Re: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem [tetex maintainer -- please respond]

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:03:41PM -0500, Mcdougall, Robert A. wrote: >"m. z." wrote: > >BTAM, the wizards will not reply to such naive questions as >yours or mine. FWIW, here's what I've found out: If you expect that there are a lot of "tetex wizards" frequenting this mailing list, I suspect th

RE: tetex 3.0.0-3 format file problem

"m. z." wrote: BTAM, the wizards will not reply to such naive questions as yours or mine. FWIW, here's what I've found out: > Why doing "latex" is invoking now pdf format ? According to the teTeX manual ('doc/tetex/TETEXDOC.{dvi,pdf,ps}'), section 4.6, "pdfetex: the new default TEX engine":

*** system shared memory version mismatch detected

I get this error right after upgrading to 1.5.16-1. I did a full search on my computer and \cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll is the only one I have. I even deleted / reinstalled cygwin but no luck. Weird, could it be because of corrupted registry settings? I've been using cygwin quite much and this is the f

RE: tail -f and pipes with bash shell

On Thu, 19 May 2005, Dave Korn wrote: > Original Message > >From: Lev Bishop > >Sent: 12 May 2005 23:56 > > > On 12/05/05, Lev Bishop wrote: > >> On 11/05/05, Peter Ekberg wrote: > > > > Sorry, sorry, sorry. > > > > 'kin

RE: mkpasswd and mkgroup failures

> On May 18 18:10, Robb, Sam wrote: > > So, she *should* have had the username and id for a domain > > user. Something in cygwin (mkpasswd, cygwin1.dll, etc.) > > seems to think she's the local user with the same username > > for some reason. > > This isn't exaclty a Cygwin problem. mkpasswd and

RE: tail -f and pipes with bash shell

Original Message >From: Lev Bishop >Sent: 12 May 2005 23:56 > On 12/05/05, Lev Bishop wrote: >> On 11/05/05, Peter Ekberg wrote: > > Sorry, sorry, sorry. > > 'kin gmail. > > Lev Amusingly enough, those were still bo

IPPROTO_IP is not a macro

: The header shall define the following macros for use as values of the level argument of getsockopt() and setsockopt(): IPPROTO_IP Internet protocol. etc cygwin defines these constants with enum, not #define, so one c

Re: Cygwin installing too much stuff

On Tue, 17 May 2005 14:31:45 -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > I have a reasonably healthy Cygwin installation that I typically use to > build various HLL compilers. One of these compilers needed the "zip" > tool in order to be built. So I fired up Cygwin and clicked to install > "zip." Well

Re: Black letters on white background?

On Wed, 18 May 2005 11:21:59 +0200, Martin Mrazek wrote: > I can find it neither in FAQ nor in documentation, so sorry for the > simple question: > > How can I switch the default Cygwin colours? Cygwin doesn't have colours. > I need black letters on white background... Depends on the Terminal E

PureMessage has processed a suspicious mail

A mail sent by you has been identified as suspicious by PureMessage. Event: Infection Action: Message quarantined Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message subject:hi Recipient: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ==

Re: locale and keychain

Karl M wrote: Hi All... The next upstream version of keychain uses the locale command to check on the settings. I didn't see any function by that name. Can coreutils add a stub for this? If it does then it lost it's portability factory. locale is not present on all unices. Thanks, ...Karl -- Un

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wrong list. Redirecting. According to Vance Turner on 5/18/2005 11:06 PM: > I usually don't write you guys, I follow the thread to see how development > is going. > > Just a note. The ls command is't quite right. > > Ls -lRC wil not recursively li

Re: New call: Please test latest snapshot

Corinna Vinschen wrote: We would like to release 1.5.17 soon. Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ [...] Please test, Corinna I tried the snapshot from 2005-05-19 and my postgres problems are fixed now (was broken after the upgrade to 1.5.16 recently). Gerr

Re: CPIO with solaris 9 flash archives

On May 19 10:12, Clemson, Chris wrote: > > > > Out of curiosity, what does `file > > v240-disbox-v1-08-archive' print? > > > > > > hmm, I don't seem to have the file command. what package is it in? > > > > file > > doh! > silly me - I was expecting it to be in a standard library. > it would hel

RE: CPIO with solaris 9 flash archives

> > > Out of curiosity, what does `file > v240-disbox-v1-08-archive' print? > > > > hmm, I don't seem to have the file command. what package is it in? > > file doh! silly me - I was expecting it to be in a standard library. it would help if was looking at the full list of packages too! E:\>fil

Re: CPIO with solaris 9 flash archives

On May 19 09:49, Clemson, Chris wrote: > > > I can't say I've used cpio much, but the man pages say that > > it should recognise the format automatically. > > > any ideas what I'm doing wrong? > > > > Hard to say. Either it's not really a compatible cpio format (some > > Solaris native format pe

RE: CPIO with solaris 9 flash archives

> > I can't say I've used cpio much, but the man pages say that > it should recognise the format automatically. > > any ideas what I'm doing wrong? > > Hard to say. Either it's not really a compatible cpio format (some > Solaris native format perhaps) or cpio doesn't recognize the format > autom

Re: mkpasswd and mkgroup failures

On May 18 18:10, Robb, Sam wrote: > So, she *should* have had the username and id for a domain > user. Something in cygwin (mkpasswd, cygwin1.dll, etc.) > seems to think she's the local user with the same username > for some reason. This isn't exaclty a Cygwin problem. mkpasswd and mkgroup are b

RE: problems in Perl process management

Yitzchak: sorry this reply is late. > I just reread the whole thread three times, and fail to detect any > rudeness from him. He did confess to being "flip", though. (I thought > it was just an attempt at humor.) http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=flip > > > > I also notice that deeper

Re: Base-files: error in /etc/skel/.inputrc, plus more sample code

On Wed, May 18, 2005 10:15 pm, Igor Pechtchanski said: > On Wed, 18 May 2005, John Morrison wrote: > >> On Wed, May 18, 2005 8:47 pm, Igor Pechtchanski said: >> > John, >> > >> > There is an error in /etc/skel/.inputrc: AFAIK, some readline >> > implementations require a space after the colon for k