Re: 1.5.13: vim suspend/resume term garbaged

Cory Sharp wrote: > I just updated my Cygwin to 1.5.13 and now in vim when I suspend > (CTRL-Z or :suspend) then resume (fg), my term is corrupted such that > term control sequences (cursor movement, redraw screen, etc) produce > only garbage output. This is the case in both a WinXP console and >

Re: Netscape or Mozilla binaries for Cygwin?

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > >Michael Yanowitz wrote: > > >>Hello: >> >> I was just wondering if there are any binaries for >>Netscape or Mozilla for Cygwin? >> >> >> > >I was able to copile Mozilla. The embedded browser works so far, >however Mozilla itself was not working as expected. I'

Re: 1.5.13: vim suspend/resume term garbaged

Michael Wardle wrote: Michael Wardle wrote: The resumption problem could be a resurfacing of: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-07/msg01091.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-01/msg00037.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01613.html I wonder if it's also related to wh

Re: 1.5.13: vim suspend/resume term garbaged

Michael Wardle wrote: Cory Sharp wrote: I just updated my Cygwin to 1.5.13 and now in vim when I suspend (CTRL-Z or :suspend) then resume (fg), my term is corrupted such that term control sequences (cursor movement, redraw screen, etc) produce only garbage output. What output exactly are you seeing

Re: 1.5.13: vim suspend/resume term garbaged

Cory Sharp wrote: I just updated my Cygwin to 1.5.13 and now in vim when I suspend (CTRL-Z or :suspend) then resume (fg), my term is corrupted such that term control sequences (cursor movement, redraw screen, etc) produce only garbage output. What output exactly are you seeing? When I try to resum

Re: Postgres 7.2

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Zeb wrote: Greetings, Zeb, I must first point out that talk of the Cygwin Time Machine is off topic for this list. However, in the interests of expedience and in an attempt to help out, there are, as Spock once said "possibilities". The Time Machine only goes back to 03/11/

Re: Any date on next cygwin package release?

Anyone know about when a new package can be expected? Thanks, Bill On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:50:37 -0800, William Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cygpath --help seg faults. There's already been a checkin to cvs to > fix it and a couple of > notes in cygwin mailing list about it. > Just wonderin

Re: No /dev/parport0

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:07:46 +0100 (MET), Mary Cuper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I´m trying the whole time to get my /dev directory work. > There is no /dev/parport0, so I tried to install one with > mknod /dev/parport0 c 99 0 > but it doesn´t help. > > I need it for programming my ATmega16 micro

RE: Errors in #include files when compiling a Legacy C++ Application

At 02:15 AM 3/26/2005, you wrote: > Tim, > >I did install the gcc C compiler. What switches need to be set with >cygcheck? I'll run it and forward the results. See: >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Par

Re: nessus 2.2.4 under cygwin

thats the thing is I even installed cygwin as administrator, my user also has administrator privileges too. so, I can either ssh into myself and logon as administrator or logon as administrator on xp sp2... yet I cant seem to get the daemon to do more then run. --- Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: fscanf "%lf" misses the "-" sign in "-5.0e+00" on cygwin 1.5.13-1

Isselmou dellahy wrote: > Hi, > I'm using cygwin 1.5.13-1 and gcc version 3.3.3 to compile the following > foo.C : > ... > The compiler does'nt show any warning and when executed prints: > > n=1 x=5.00 > > missing the "-" sign. You're seeing the same bug that was reported here

fscanf "%lf" misses the "-" sign in "-5.0e+00" on cygwin 1.5.13-1

Hi, I'm using cygwin 1.5.13-1 and gcc version 3.3.3 to compile the following foo.C : #include #include int main() { FILE *ff = fopen( "foo.dat", "r"); double x; int n = fscanf( ff, "%lf", &x); printf( "n=%d x=%lf\n", n, x); fclose(ff); return 0; } foo.dat contains the single text line: -5

fscanf "%lf" misses the "-" sign in "-5.0e+00" on cygwin 1.5.13-1

Hi, I'm using cygwin 1.5.13-1 and gcc version 3.3.3 to compile the following foo.C : #include #include int main() { FILE *ff = fopen( "foo.dat", "r"); double x; int n = fscanf( ff, "%lf", &x); printf( "n=%d x=%lf\n", n, x); fclose(ff); return 0; } foo.dat contains the single text line: -5

Re: nessus 2.2.4 under cygwin

tim nelson wrote: > nessusd runs and I can even connect to the daemon, but > if I attempt to do a scan outside of my machine I get > nothing. However if I am scanning 127.0.0.1 all is > fine. I don't know if this affects you or not but recent versions of Windows (XP SP2? don't remember) require

nessus 2.2.4 under cygwin

For the past few days I have been fighting to get this to work. I have had no real problem with installing nessus under cygwin. I have libpcap and libnet installed. Using libpcap-0.7n which was modified to install under cygwin. Along with winpcap headers and such that are needed. Then libnet-1

Re: Netscape or Mozilla binaries for Cygwin?

Michael Yanowitz wrote: Hello: I was just wondering if there are any binaries for Netscape or Mozilla for Cygwin? I was able to copile Mozilla. The embedded browser works so far, however Mozilla itself was not working as expected. I'll announce if I get it working. Gerrit -- =^..^= Action So

GDB/Insight for Pascal

Hi, Gurus. I am trying to compile/debug a program in Pascal. I invoke it as gpc -g -o hello.exe hello.pas Then I try to debug it with insight as: insight hello.exe and 'insight' does not shom me a source, just assembly code. But the same procedure for C: gcc -g -o hello.exe hello.c works well