Hello,
I know this question has only been recently on this list, but I can't
seem to find the answer anymore, and the cygwin mail archive
is dead slow this morning, so here I go :
In which package is the 'script' utility located, or is it a package
which is outside the standard Cygwin repository
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Jon A. Lambert wrote:
> Peter A. Castro wrote:
> >
> > might find it useful or interesting. Unfortinately, it only goes
> > back to April of 2002, though I actually have package versions going
> > back further, but not the setup.ini to go with them.
>
> You didn't mention the
At 11:05 PM 1/26/2005, you wrote:
>Peter A. Castro wrote:
>>
>>might find it useful or interesting. Unfortinately, it only goes
>>back to April of 2002, though I actually have package versions going
>>back further, but not the setup.ini to go with them.
>
>You didn't mention the b20/20.1 release.
Hello,
I am running cygwin on a Win2k machine. I have a C
program that I am compiling using gcc. Upon execution
from the prompt, the program just exits without any
output. When I run gdb on the executable,I
set the first breakpoint at main() and run the
program. However, the program segfaults be
On Sun, 2005-23-01 at 16:03 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 23 09:28, John Mellor wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 20:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:17:44PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > > >I don't know if the ancient Bxx series was LGPL, but the curr
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> Fixed. By the way, does anyone know exactly what Devel packages are required
> to build Cygwin? I used to just think "install everything" but now
> there's a lot of
> new X or GNOME related stuff. I know I've got more than I need
> installed, but I'm
> thinking tha
Peter A. Castro wrote:
might find it useful or interesting. Unfortinately, it only goes
back to April of 2002, though I actually have package versions going
back further, but not the setup.ini to go with them.
You didn't mention the b20/20.1 release. If you and anyone doesn't have it
and wants i
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:36:50 -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:29:29 +0100, David Dindorp wrote:
> > And the link in the FAQ is wrong:
> >
> > "How can I debug cygwin" (entry 105) says:
> >
> > "To build a debugging version of the Cygwin DLL,
> > you will need to follow
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 02:10 PM 1/26/2005, you wrote:
> >On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
> >
> >> of variations and options available that were not there heretofore.
> >> This is the reason I directed Neven back to Peter's site. Clearly,
> >> though, if Neven and other
Jon wrote:
> I'm trying to run startxwin.bat on a Windows XP system. When I do, the
> Cygwin/X Server starts however when the terminal window comes up, I get the
> two following error messages:
>
> xterm: Can't execvp /usr/bin/bash: No such file or directory
> xterm: Could not exec /bin/sh: No su
Hi:
I'm trying to run startxwin.bat on a Windows XP system. When I do, the
Cygwin/X Server starts however when the terminal window comes up, I get the
two following error messages:
xterm: Can't execvp /usr/bin/bash: No such file or directory
xterm: Could not exec /bin/sh: No such file or direct
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:29:29 +0100, David Dindorp wrote:
> How about adding a line in the FAQ to the "how to build cygwin" (104)
> entry
> stating that the "configure ; make" mentioned does produce a Cygwin with
> all
> debugging symbols?
>
> And the link in the FAQ is wrong:
>
> "How can I debug
> On Jan 25 09:08, Steven Read wrote:
> > Really I did read the FAQ. By the way
> > could I persuade you to release the API in PDF format?)
You can easily create your own PDF from the DocBook XML files
(available in CVS or the cygwin-doc src package) on linux with a
command like:
xmlto pdf cygw
At 02:10 PM 1/26/2005, you wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
>
>> of variations and options available that were not there heretofore.
>> This is the reason I directed Neven back to Peter's site. Clearly,
>> though, if Neven and others that use the "cygwin time machine" can get
>> what
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:25:45PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>However, because I'm a masochist, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a
>>good idea to advertise this as "cygwin news" on the front page of
>>http://cygwin.com/.
>
>Gosh, Chris, I'm flatte
> I see from later email that you are having problems removing some files
> (specifically symlinks). I'd check who actually owns those files, using
> the Windows Explorer, (right-click on file) Properties->Security tab.
> See who owns it. You might need to take ownership of the file, or login
> a
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:10:49AM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> >On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
> >>Obviously, those who disagree with me are still free to answer the
> >>inevitable posts that we'll get here about the "cygwin time machine
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:58:18PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Actually, I think this is a neat idea. I tried to do something like it
> >for personal use about 18 months ago -- I wanted a one-time snapshot of
> >the cygwin-1.3.x baseline just p
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:10:49AM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
>>Obviously, those who disagree with me are still free to answer the
>>inevitable posts that we'll get here about the "cygwin time machine"
>>anyway. With any luck, those posts will be few and
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 01:34 PM 1/25/2005, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> >> This subject is really off-topic for this list. The "cygwin
> >> time machine" is not a service supported by this list.
> >
> > Larry, you're being too harsh there! The "how to uninstall" procedure is
> >sta
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Neven Luetic wrote:
> Hello,
Greetings Neven,
> after a (stupid) attempt to install an older version of cygwin over my
> current installation (using the "cygwin time machine" mentioned some
> days ago) I just wanted to throw it away and start anew, but the cygwin
> directory
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Actually, I think this is a neat idea. I tried to do something like it
> for personal use about 18 months ago -- I wanted a one-time snapshot of
> the cygwin-1.3.x baseline just prior to the 1.5.x transition.
>
> But I waited too long (e.g. after packa
Max Bowsher wrote:
Unfortunately, no.
I seem to recall that the setup hint file mechanism allows you to set an
older version to be the current, while still allowing the newer version
to be downloaded on request. If the package is broken for lots of
people, perhaps findutils' maintainer should d
Chuck wrote:
Is there a way to tell the installer never to update findutils? The
current version of that package is still broken and every time I update
other packages, it installs the newer findutils by default. I want it to
ignore findutils while still updating other packages.
Unfortunately, no.
Is there a way to tell the installer never to update findutils? The
current version of that package is still broken and every time I update
other packages, it installs the newer findutils by default. I want it to
ignore findutils while still updating other packages.
TIA
--
To reply by email rem
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:58:18PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Actually, I think this is a neat idea. I tried to do something like it
>for personal use about 18 months ago -- I wanted a one-time snapshot of
>the cygwin-1.3.x baseline just prior to the 1.5.x transition.
>
>But I waited too long
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Neven Luetic wrote:
> > after a (stupid) attempt to install an older version of cygwin over my
> > current installation (using the "cygwin time machine" mentioned some
> > days ago) I just wanted to throw it away and start anew, but the cygwin
> > directory is undeletable.
> >
Ack!
Apologies for the formatting.
The company I'm employed at uses Outlook (thereby MS-WORD) for e-mail.
Here's what I wanted to say:
The FAQ entry 105 links to entry 102 under "how to compile".
Shouldn't this point to 104 instead?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-s
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> Umm, that was my bad. The thing is, "--enable-debugging" really
produces
>> a developer debug version, with extra tracing, etc. If all you want
is a
>> version of DLL with all the symbols (i.e., unstripped), the regular
build
>> produces that as well.
Cristopher Fayl
> after a (stupid) attempt to install an older version of cygwin over my
> current installation (using the "cygwin time machine" mentioned some
> days ago) I just wanted to throw it away and start anew, but the cygwin
> directory is undeletable.
>
> This is due to some symbolic links from version
30 matches
Mail list logo
