On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:28:26PM -0500, "Jon A. Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >I made no effort to find Cygwinized profanity. I stumbled across a
> >program named "fortune" one day, which I was told printed out corny
> >sayings etc, and installed it. Then I
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:46:37 -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) wrote:
> Seems like this is asked about often enough to be in the FAQ.
We try not to include general Unix questions in the FAQ.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin
Sorry folks I just could not resist.
A twit hit a free software mailing list.
On censoring fortune he did insist.
``Can't have limericks about pussies and dicks!''
A few clicks Googled him out a masochist!
(Sheer creative writing, of course. Even the slightest resemblance
between this limeric and
>
> Personally, I thought that them doing this was a sign of a more
> innocent time, where we didn't have to worry about every single
> word that came out of our mouth (or keyboard).
>
> Seriously guy, your type is one of the primary reasons why the
> internet is getting - its not quite there yet,
Huh? The name "fortune" is close to what it does. It sort of displays
fortune cookie like stuff. Labelling a program like grep with a English
word that has no bearing on its functionality is not a correct analogy.
Sorry my remarks went over your head. I don't think a filthy
limerick is in any w
> > That already carries a judgment reflecting your values.
> > Certainly the people who included them in fortune thought otherwise.
> >
>
> If they had thought otherwise, they wouldn't have included them in the first
> place. As a licensed nerd mind-reader, I can tell you exactly the thought
>
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Then you have no sense of self-worth. Sorry to hear that.
1. ?
2. Kiss my fortune-o, DeFaria.
Now I'm sure you have little self-worth...
This has nothing to do with what year it is.
Yeah, it does. For the first time in history, there are now two
lawyers for every human on
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > That already carries a judgment reflecting your values.
> > Certainly the people who included them in fortune thought otherwise.
>
> If they had thought otherwise, they wouldn't have included them in the first
> place. As a licensed nerd mind-read
Raye Raskin wrote:
The problem seems simple to me. A filthy Limerick is not a Fortune.
The program is misnamed.
Call it something else or just put fortunes in it.
alias limerick="fortune -o"
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.c
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:30:13PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote:
>>Huh? The name "fortune" is close to what it does. It sort of displays
>>fortune cookie like stuff. Labelling a program like grep with a English
>>word that has no bearing on its functionality is not a correct analogy.
>
>Sorry my rem
> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>
> >> Any company firing me for "creating a hostile work
> environment" for
> >> such a matter as this is, in my book, not a company I wish to work
> >> for. YMMV.
> >
> > Nor I. In fact, I doubt many would disagree. But then, many have
> > mouths to feed, and may
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:12:57PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor"
Sent: Thurs
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Any company firing me for "creating a hostile work environment" for
such a matter as this is, in my book, not a company I wish to work
for. YMMV.
Nor I. In fact, I doubt many would disagree. But then, many have
mouths to feed, and may not have the luxury of wishing.
The
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I made no effort to find Cygwinized profanity. I stumbled across a
program named "fortune" one day, which I was told printed out corny
sayings etc, and installed it. Then I forgot about it. Then, some
time later, I was told that what I thought was a program written with
William R. Knox:
> Has anyone who is concerned about this read some of the,
> shall we say, less than pure comments that developers will on
> occasion put into comments in their code?
I once submitted a patch to Setup that contained a comment to the effect of:
"...and people in Hell want icewa
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:12:57PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Christopher Faylor"
>Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:57 PM
>Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
>
>
>>On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:13:40PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote:
>>>The problem seems sim
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
If it's better suited to publication on the wall of a public toilet
than on the wall of your living room, for all to ponder and
appreciate, then why keep it.
That already carries a judgment reflecting your values. Certainly the
people who included them in fortune though
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > Yes and no, Corinna. Merely having them on the harddrive
> in a company
> > computer could be construed as "creating a hostile work environment"
> > -- leading to liability issues for the company and
> employment "issues"
> > for the unsuspecting cygwin user.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:13:40PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote:
The problem seems simple to me. A filthy Limerick is not a Fortune.
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote
Ah jeez deFaria:
That's clever! Did you come up with that all by your lonesome?
As an atheist I always wonder why christians can "turn the other
cheek" but cannot seem to muster how to turn their eyes away!
As a thinking man, I always wonder why atheists:
1. Hate Christian
Has anyone who is concerned about this read some of the, shall we say,
less than pure comments that developers will on occasion put into comments
in their code? I have come across a few that are, at very least, very
rude, if not downright indecent (depending on where you draw the line of
indecency)
Charles Wilson wrote:
Yes and no, Corinna. Merely having them on the harddrive in a company
computer could be construed as "creating a hostile work environment"
-- leading to liability issues for the company and employment "issues"
for the unsuspecting cygwin user.
Any company firing me for "cr
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > Jesus Tapdancing Christ you people, did I accidentally
> stumble into a
> > junior highschool or something?
>
> Heh. You *just* noticed? :-D
> Igor
BHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAH!! Touche, mon ami! Touche!
--
G
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:13:40PM -0800, Raye Raskin wrote:
>The problem seems simple to me. A filthy Limerick is not a Fortune.
>
>The program is misnamed.
Hmm. Ever heard of "grep" or "ls"? Fortune is much closer to being named
something that makes sense than several other programs in the di
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> [snip]
> Jesus Tapdancing Christ you people, did I accidentally stumble into a junior
> highschool or something?
Heh. You *just* noticed? :-D
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_
Ok, clearly the voting process is hopelessly flawed. When will people
learn: Democracy doesn't work.
So, in the interest of putting this mess to bed once and for all, I ask you
all to consider:
WWRHD?
That's right, "What Would Red Hat Do?". But please don't speculate, there's
no need. We sim
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
That's cool. Thanks for doing this. The way you do it is probably
the best alternative. I would find it very annoying if the offensive
jokes would just go away. It doesn't matter if one loves or hates
these jokes, or if somebody feels offended. It's a matter of free
cho
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, R.Powers wrote:
>
> > I don't think it has anything to do with Christianity or
> Atheism or PC
> > or Free Speech..or being Hip or Coolor forcing anything on
> > anybody..
> >
> > It's merely obscene crudity.
> >
> > If it's better suited to publication on the
Andy, Andy, Andy:
> Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Brian Bruns wrote:
> >
> >> and leave it be. We shouldn't be forcing our views on other people.
> >
> > If you leave it be, then that is the view forced on other people.
>
> No view is forced. People must make an effort to find
Christopher Faylor wrote:
How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune files?
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[ ] Don't care. Can we go back to talking about how negative this list is
now?
[ ]
The problem seems simple to me. A filthy Limerick is not a Fortune.
The program is misnamed.
Call it something else or just put fortunes in it.
"Confucius say: Man who have sex on ground have Peace on Earth."
Can it be that simple?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpl
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:38 PM [EST], Christopher Faylor
> wrote:
>
> >
> > How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune
> > files?
> >
> > [ ] Offended. Think about the children!
> > [ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
> > [ ]
Ah jeez deFaria:
> Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:16 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >
> >> My write-in candidate:
> >> [x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional in the
> >> extreme and can only result in embarassment and trouble.
> >
> > As a Chr
I've noticed the 32K limitation for a long time now (few years at
least). Never really
thought too much about it though because I also assumed that it was because
lpCommandLine in CreateProcess() maxed out at 32,000 characters (at least
according to the msdn documentation).
Of course, that assump
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Brian Bruns wrote:
>
> > and leave it be. We shouldn't be forcing our views on other people.
>
> If you leave it be, then that is the view forced on other people.
If I am not mistaken, Brian had written something above that about wa
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, R.Powers wrote:
> I don't think it has anything to do with Christianity or Atheism or PC
> or Free Speech..or being Hip or Coolor forcing anything on
> anybody..
>
> It's merely obscene crudity.
>
> If it's better suited to publication on the wall of a public toilet
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Brian Bruns wrote:
and leave it be. We shouldn't be forcing our views on other people.
If you leave it be, then that is the view forced on other people.
No view is forced. People must make an effort to find it. If said person
doesn't want it then don't go
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, R.Powers wrote:
> > Message from "Christopher Faylor" on 01/05/05 08:38 PM PT quoted:
> > > How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune
> > > files?
> > >
> > > [ ] Offended. Think about the children!
> > > [ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with yo
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, claude.roblez wrote:
> >>The problem appears with the [timer_create] function called with a
> >>[sigevent]
> >>structure having its [sigev_notify] member set to [SIGEV_THREAD].
> >>In this case, the function pointed to by the [sigev_notify_function] member
> >>is
> >>prototyp
> Message from "Christopher Faylor" on 01/05/05 08:38 PM PT quoted:
> > How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune
files?
> >
> > [ ] Offended. Think about the children!
> > [ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
> > [ ] Don't care. Can we
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Brian Bruns wrote:
> and leave it be. We shouldn't be forcing our views on other people.
If you leave it be, then that is the view forced on other people.
Jeremy C. Reed
technical support & remote administration
http://www
Seems like this is asked about often enough to be in the FAQ.
At Wednesday, January 05, 2005 2:09 PM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Emil Rojas wrote:
>
>> At 10:26 AM 1/5/2005, you wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Emil Rojas wrote:
>>>
I am providing grep with a long list of
how is "script" enabled, pls?
thanks,
Thufir
--
___
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/proble
On Jan 6 13:49, Shankar Unni wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > our_nan = atof ("NaN");
>
> Which platform does this work on, for you? I wouldn't expect it to
> "work" (i.e. return a NaN), and I can't get it to work on a Linux
> (somewhat old, I admit) box either. Or using (hiss!) MSDEV (VC++
as per
$ pwd
/home/Administrator/smake-1.2
$ make all
NOTICE: Using bootstrap 'Makefile' to make 'all'
cd psmake && sh ./MAKE-all
Checking for working bootstrap make...
Smake release 1.2a23 (i686-pc-cygwin) Copyright (C) 1985, 87, 88, 91,
1995-2004 Jörg Schilling
./psmake/smake all
==>
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:38 PM [EST], Christopher Faylor
wrote:
>
> How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune
> files?
>
> [ ] Offended. Think about the children!
> [ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
> [ ] Don't care. Can we
Dave Korn wrote:
It may also be possible to workaround the problem by fooling around with the
default stack allocation size; this can have knock-on effects which clear up the
reserved area of the process' memory map that error message is complaining
about.
See
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/
Roger Leigh wrote:
our_nan = atof ("NaN");
Which platform does this work on, for you? I wouldn't expect it to
"work" (i.e. return a NaN), and I can't get it to work on a Linux
(somewhat old, I admit) box either. Or using (hiss!) MSDEV (VC++ 2003
.NET) on a WinXP box.
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Jan 6, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Mike Disbrow wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:58:39PM -0600, Mike Disbrow wrote:
>I'd like to build the supporting Cygwin DLLs to be renamed to
something
>other than cyg*.dll (e.g. cygwin1.dll to foo.dll), what is the best
>way to build the DLLs with different names?
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:58:39PM -0600, Mike Disbrow wrote:
>I'd like to build the supporting Cygwin DLLs to be renamed to something
>other than cyg*.dll (e.g. cygwin1.dll to foo.dll), what is the best
>way to build the DLLs with different names?
May I ask why you want to do this? I can't think
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
> > Richard Lethin wrote:
> >
> >> Max Bowsher wrote:
> >>
> >>> Richard Lethin wrote:
> >>>
> There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
> numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
> it can cross differen
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[X] Don't care. Can we go back to talking about how negative this list is
now?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.
Max Bowsher wrote:
Richard Lethin wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Richard Lethin wrote:
There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
it can cross different operating systems over IP. The protocol uses
the
vers
Richard Lethin wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Richard Lethin wrote:
There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
it can cross different operating systems over IP. The protocol uses the
version number to decide
Hi Richard. I'm the maintainer of Unison for Cygwin.
> There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
> numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
> it can cross different operating systems over IP. The protocol uses the
> version number to dec
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[x] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[ ] Don't care. Can we go back to talking about how negative this list
is now?
But actually would have preferred a.
[x] Oh Great! Now I'm gonna have to install fortune.
--
Unsub
Message from "Christopher Faylor" on 01/05/05 08:38 PM PT quoted:
How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune files?
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[X] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[X] Don't care. Can we go back to talking abo
Does anybody noticed mount problem with latest nfs server.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Andrew DeFaria
> Sent: 06 January 2005 15:49
> Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:16 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >
> >> My write-in candidate:
> >> [x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessi
> >> [x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional in the
> >> extreme and can only result in embarassment and trouble.
> >
> > As a Christian, I agree with Gary. :)
> >
> As an atheist I always wonder why christians can "turn the other cheek"
> but cannot seem to muster how to turn the
[X] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/05/05 09:38PM >>>
> Maybe we need a vote. I would really like to know how people feel about
> this. We haven't had a vote in a long time so:
> How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune files?
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[ ] Not
Henry,
I don't, in fact, run listDLLs on the program that won't open. Just tried it
again:
listDLLs -d cygwin
and it hangs.
Sheesh -- it hangs if I run it with any command-line options (other than /?) or
none.
I'll report the problem to Mark Russinovich at sysinternals.
I suppose I _could_
Dear Cygwinistas:
Steve Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] offers:
> Maybe the package maintainer could consider building two
> packages : a 'clean' fortune and rename the current package
> to 'fortune-xxx'. I have no idea how easy or difficult this
> is, but it would satisfy both camps.
I second
Hi folks,
While fixing up glib-2.6.0 to build, I found a failure in the
floating-point tests. This is seemingly because atof() is bust.
This is a trivial example:
/* for NAN and INFINITY */
#define _ISOC99_SOURCE
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
double our_na
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The problem appears with the [timer_create] function called with a [sigevent]
structure having its [sigev_notify] member set to [SIGEV_THREAD].
In this case, the function pointed to by the [sigev_notify_function] member is
prototyped [void(*)(union sigval)] and should rec
Me too:
[x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional in the
extreme and can only result in embarassment and trouble.
I agree it should be rot-13 etc.
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:58:39PM -0600, Mike Disbrow wrote:
>I'd like to build the supporting Cygwin DLLs to be renamed to something
>other than cyg*.dll (e.g. cygwin1.dll to foo.dll), what is the best
>way to build the DLLs with different names?
May I ask why you want to do this? I can't thin
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:16 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
My write-in candidate:
[x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional in the
extreme and can only result in embarassment and trouble.
As a Christian, I agree with Gary. :)
I actually think it's an
Max Bowsher wrote:
Richard Lethin wrote:
There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
it can cross different operating systems over IP. The protocol uses the
version number to decide whether two processes
Richard Lethin wrote:
There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
it can cross different operating systems over IP. The protocol uses the
version number to decide whether two processes on different syste
Gerrit,
> Could you post a perl snippet which results in the error?
$ perl
does it. Anything else, naturally, fails in the same way.
> rebaseall doesn't know about perl extension dlls which you may have
> installed manually,
I haven't installed any perl extensions; I'm using the plain-vanilla
Might be how you're calling RXVT. :-/
Here is the command line sequence I use (via a shorcut on my Desktop, of
course, hehe) :-)
rxvt.exe -title Shell -e 'c:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe' --login -i
I have the following User variable defined from System
Properties/Advanced/Environment Variables:
BASH_EN
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of tosch
> Sent: 06 January 2005 15:04
> situation:
> ==
> a heterogenous network with NT(SVP 6a), W2K, XP and several
> unix-servers. I
> would like to skip to any desired server via sshd without
> password, because i
> don't w
Hi folks,
situation:
==
a heterogenous network with NT(SVP 6a), W2K, XP and several unix-servers. I
would like to skip to any desired server via sshd without password, because i
don't want to take a "bunch of keys" with me. Also the windows-systems have to
be reachable on this way. Not onl
There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
it can cross different operating systems over IP. The protocol uses the
version number to decide whether two processes on different systems will
communicat
>>The problem appears with the [timer_create] function called with a [sigevent]
>>structure having its [sigev_notify] member set to [SIGEV_THREAD].
>>In this case, the function pointed to by the [sigev_notify_function] member is
>>prototyped [void(*)(union sigval)] and should receive the [sigev_val
Hi all.
I know this has probably been discussed before but I can't get it to
work on my system. When using ls, the output is not in color. So I read
that the following line should be added to .bashrc
alias ls='ls --color=tty'
I have done this, but it does not work.
I guess my .bashrc file is not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rebaseall was no help
I'm rather puzzled -- any clues, anyone?
rebaseall doesn't know about perl extension dlls which you may have
installed manually, these need to be rebased manually (or added to the
rebaseall list), there were some scripts posted to the list how to do
th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps perl is looking for 0xBF bytes and only getting 0x75 bytes?
But that does seem unlikely -- perl shouldn't be anywhere near such a pig as
xemacs.
Perl uses 8 MB for stack, however that is not too much I think.
Could you post a perl snippet which results in t
Christopher Faylor wrote:
How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune files?
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[x] Don't care. Can we go back to talking about how negative this
list is now?
G
Yep, it looks like CSRSS.EXE is taking whatever is leftover from the
Cygwin-related task.
I did _MUCH_ web surfing last night, looking for information pertaining
to the CSRSS.EXE and it looks like it's basically responsible for
handling the Win32 subsystem. I tried tweaking this and that by
a
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:50:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The problem appears with the [timer_create] function called with a [sigevent]
>structure having its [sigev_notify] member set to [SIGEV_THREAD].
>In this case, the function pointed to by the [sigev_notify_function] member is
>proto
Jason Tishler writes:
> Henry,
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:10:26PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sigh. More fodder for the spammers... :,(
Damn. Sorry about that.
> 1. shutdown all Cygwin processes
> 2. start bash (do not us
The problem appears with the [timer_create] function called with a [sigevent]
structure having its [sigev_notify] member set to [SIGEV_THREAD].
In this case, the function pointed to by the [sigev_notify_function] member is
prototyped [void(*)(union sigval)] and should receive the [sigev_value] memb
Your email could not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: too big
(maximum size is 10240 bytes).
Il messaggio non puo' essere recapitato a [EMAIL PROTECTED] in quanto
eccessivamente grande (massimo 10240 byte).
* MESSAGE BODY SUPPRESSED *
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 06 January 2005 04:39
> Maybe we need a vote. I would really like to know how people
> feel about
> this. We haven't had a vote in a long time so:
>
> How do you feel about the off-color content in the cy
We received your email. The photo submission period for our holiday contest has
ended. If your email contains an inquiry, we will do our best to respond to you
within 24 hours.
Sincerely,
The PETsMART.com Team
Check out our Holiday Pet Photo Contest at
http://www.petsmart.com/photo_contest .
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:24:17AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan 5 23:43, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> Ok, I will maintain it and will get a release out in the next couple
>> days (one week at the outside). For the record, I will be changing
>> limerick (and gerrold.limerick, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it normal that during an SSH connection EFS-encrypted files are not
accessible?
Is it for the way the SSH token autentication is made?
Lapo
- --
Lapo Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
-
Henry,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:10:26PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sigh. More fodder for the spammers... :,(
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> >> Ah, but rebasing cygwin1.dll _did_ fix the problem (once I
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:16 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> My write-in candidate:
>> [x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional in the
>> extreme and can only result in embarassment and trouble.
>
> As a Christian, I agree with Gary. :)
>
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Kal.Dee
> Sent: 06 January 2005 03:37
> Hi all,
>
> Not sure if the highly obscene limericks (/usr/share/fortune/limerick)
> are meant to be in the cygwin distro...
>
> Kalman Dee
> Canberra, OZ
:) ROFLMAO thank you for pointing
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mark Hadfield
> Sent: 06 January 2005 00:58
> Dante Chialvo wrote:
> > I have similar problem than the one posted a while ago in
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00842.html
> >
> > Using cygwin/g77, in a PC with 102
On Jan 5 23:43, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> Ok, I will maintain it and will get a release out in the next couple
> days (one week at the outside). For the record, I will be changing
> limerick (and gerrold.limerick, which is in the freebsd sources) to -o
> files but continuing to install the
On Jan 5 23:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Not sure if the highly obscene limericks (/usr/share/fortune/limerick)
> >are meant to be in the cygwin distro...
>
> Wow. I think I vaguely recall that something like this was in fo
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:57:48AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:32:14PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
> > >Remember, alot of these have been in the fortunes package for god
> > >knows how long, and Cygwin isn't the only o
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:32:14PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
> >Remember, alot of these have been in the fortunes package for god
> >knows how long, and Cygwin isn't the only one thats going to have
> >them. I'm betting that any distro that has the
98 matches
Mail list logo
