On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:54:26PM -0600, pedal2metal wrote:
> Hi,
>I downloaded the latest full Cygwin packages on 1/3/2005.
> I was wondering why the following 3 packages are always "Skipped" unless
> you explicitly click the specific packages. I don't want to download a
> package
> that isn
Hi,
I downloaded the latest full Cygwin packages on 1/3/2005.
I was wondering why the following 3 packages are always "Skipped" unless
you explicitly click the specific packages. I don't want to download a
package
that isn't ready for consumption. I've downloaded/installed everything else
with
There is a pipe problems thread in the cygwin-patches mail archive that for
1.5.11-1. This seems to be related to unison hanging when using cygwin's
ssh on w32 sp2. I seem to still be getting hangs with 1.5.12-1, and don't
know how to revert to 1.5.10-3, which is the version that is reported t
At 10:51 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
>Wow! You're not kidding - cygwin cvs performance is comparable to
>native performance on local drives.
>
>I'm obviously going to look through the archives to see previous
>discussions of network drive performance. In the meantime, do you know
>if the problem is
Wow! You're not kidding - cygwin cvs performance is comparable to
native performance on local drives.
I'm obviously going to look through the archives to see previous
discussions of network drive performance. In the meantime, do you know
if the problem is one that just lacked someone willing to
> At 06:14 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
> >On Wednesday 05 January 2005 00:26, Isaac Foraker wrote:
> >
> >> I am, however, greatly disappointed at how negatively
> certain members
> >> of
> >
> >Totally agree. "Negative" is the correct word. I never felt
> so much of
> >it (I'm talking about just c
"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Landry wrote:
>
> > "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Walter Landry wrote:
> >>
> >>About the gconftool-2 postinstall script hangs:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Is there an easy way to figure out why gconftool is hanging?
> >>
> >>I guess
At 09:29 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
>Can anyone speculate as to why cygwin cvs is so much slower than their
>native windows equivalents?
>
>In short, 'cvs update' using cygwin cvs takes 7-9 times as long to do
>the same task as a non-cygwin port of cvs from www.cvshome.org/.
>
>To update a missing
At 09:03 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
>
>> Well, negative or positive, we cannot change how anyone responds to posts
>> on this list nor can we change how people interpret those responses. As
>> a result, I don't see much point in lots of "me too"s along this line
Can anyone speculate as to why cygwin cvs is so much slower than their
native windows equivalents?
In short, 'cvs update' using cygwin cvs takes 7-9 times as long to do
the same task as a non-cygwin port of cvs from www.cvshome.org/.
To update a missing directory that contains almost 3000 file
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
> Well, negative or positive, we cannot change how anyone responds to posts
> on this list nor can we change how people interpret those responses. As
> a result, I don't see much point in lots of "me too"s along this line,
The point would be to bring this to
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:26:58PM -0700, Isaac Foraker wrote:
> I am, however, greatly disappointed at how negatively certain members of
> this list treat people who provide feedback.
Try to ignore it. There are others out there just ignoring it too.
> Not being able to keep up
> with the vol
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 06:14 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
> >On Wednesday 05 January 2005 00:26, Isaac Foraker wrote:
> >
> >> I am, however, greatly disappointed at how negatively certain members of
> >
> >Totally agree. "Negative" is the correct word. I never felt so much of it
>
josef hinteregger wrote:
If I use listdlls.exe from www.sysinternals.com to display the dll's
referenced by bash, bash starts
consuming almost 100% of CPU time. listdlls hangs, while bash still
accepts and executes commands.
I am using cygwin1.dll version 1.5.12.
Possibly http://www.cygwin.com/
Dont know if I sent this message to the right place
- Original Message -
From: "bytemaster1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: GDB (no debugging symbols found)
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >
At 06:14 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
>On Wednesday 05 January 2005 00:26, Isaac Foraker wrote:
>
>> I am, however, greatly disappointed at how negatively certain members of
>
>Totally agree. "Negative" is the correct word. I never felt so much of it (I'm
>talking about just certain members, of course)
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 00:26, Isaac Foraker wrote:
> I am, however, greatly disappointed at how negatively certain members of
Totally agree. "Negative" is the correct word. I never felt so much of it (I'm
talking about just certain members, of course) on any other lists. This is
just sad.
I'll be plain. I try to contribute feedback to open source projects
that I use. I've had my own projects, and know how hard it is to get
feedback. I like Cygwin. It lets me switch between Unix and Windows
configurations relatively easily.
I am, however, greatly disappointed at how negativel
Charles, how about a new cvs update?
1.11.17 (2004-11-03) and
probably as [test] the 1.12.11 release also. (2004-12-13)
https://ccvs.cvshome.org/source/browse/ccvs/NEWS?rev=1.116.2.118&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
There are multiple bug fixes in both branches.
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-gr
> * Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-23 10:35:16 +0100]:
>
>> My temporary fix for my developers is to remove coreutils `link' from
>> our systems,
that's what I had to do too.
>> but if it is reinstalled every time coreutils is
>> upgraded, this will cause an ongoing problem.
indee
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:50:02AM -0700, Isaac Foraker wrote:
>That's a really nice attitude. I don't expect anyone to bend over
>backwards, but a little QC would be nice. If you would prefer that
>professionals using Cygwin with commercial configurations do not provide
>feedback, I suggest y
If I use listdlls.exe from www.sysinternals.com to display the dll's
referenced by bash, bash starts
consuming almost 100% of CPU time. listdlls hangs, while bash still
accepts and executes commands.
I am using cygwin1.dll version 1.5.12.
Possibly http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-03/msg0111
teTeX version 2.99.7 is now available in the [test] distribution.
This is the first upstream teTeX 3.0 release candidate. When
teTeX-3.0 is released, I expect this to replace the 2.0 series soon.
teTeX 3.0 is a major upgrade. As such you may find the release notes in
/usr/share/texmf/doc/t
Thanks for this record. It should be useful for others.
Larry
At 10:37 AM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
>Hi Folks,
> Here's the conclusion to my sshd journey. Larry was correct.
>When installed properly, sshd should "just work", even using keys & with
>multiple users.
>Here's an exact record of the p
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:04:42PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:52:24PM +0100, Olaf F?llinger wrote:
>>on my notebook with WinXP I'm using cygwin day by day. I receive the
>>ip configuration by dhcp from windows. While most of the cygwins tools
>>have no problem the
An updated version of cygwin-doc is now available. It includes
Cygwin and newlib documentation in formats such as man, texinfo,
HTML, and PDF.
This is a normal incremental release with a few minor changes:
--the plain-text version of the FAQ has been removed in favor
of the HTML version and to
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:52:24PM +0100, Olaf F?llinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on my notebook with WinXP I'm using cygwin day by day. I receive the ip
> configuration by dhcp from windows. While most of the cygwins tools have
> no problem the dns tools(host, dig,...) seems to insist on a working
> /etc
That's a really nice attitude. I don't expect anyone to bend over
backwards, but a little QC would be nice. If you would prefer that
professionals using Cygwin with commercial configurations do not provide
feedback, I suggest you update the fact and just say so.
IF
Christopher Faylor wrote:
O
On Jan 4 10:21, Zachary Uram wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:03:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 4 05:57, Zachary Uram wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:59:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
> > > > ipc-deamon2 has been deprecated. Use cygserver instead. It's part of
Hi Folks,
Here's the conclusion to my sshd journey. Larry was correct.
When installed properly, sshd should "just work", even using keys & with
multiple users.
Here's an exact record of the process I used for those considering embarking
on this journey
for themselves. :-)
thanks & best regard
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:03:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 4 05:57, Zachary Uram wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:59:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
> > > ipc-deamon2 has been deprecated. Use cygserver instead. It's part of the
> > > Cygwin base package and installed int
Sharma, Pallavi (GE Healthcare) wrote:
I forgot to mention it but yes I am starting this service using following
command :
" net start xinetd"
This service is visible on Windows service Interface but when I run command "net start" to list all the servcies,
xinetd service is missing in the list.
I
On Jan 4 05:57, Zachary Uram wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:59:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
> > ipc-deamon2 has been deprecated. Use cygserver instead. It's part of the
> > Cygwin base package and installed into /usr/sbin. Documentation is in
> > /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/cygserver.README.
>
> Ok I
I forgot to mention it but yes I am starting this service using following
command :
" net start xinetd"
This service is visible on Windows service Interface but when I run command
"net start" to list all the servcies,
xinetd service is missing in the list.
I can start this service by using com
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 05:58:47AM -0500, Zachary Uram wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 05:57:26 -0500, Zachary Uram wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:59:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Dec 29 22:50, Zachary Uram wrote:
> > > > Hello I am running the latest Cygwin with cygipc-2.03-2.tar packa
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 05:57:26 -0500, Zachary Uram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:59:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 29 22:50, Zachary Uram wrote:
> > > Hello I am running the latest Cygwin with cygipc-2.03-2.tar package
> > > and when I run
> >
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:59:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 29 22:50, Zachary Uram wrote:
> > Hello I am running the latest Cygwin with cygipc-2.03-2.tar package
> > and when I run
> > /usr/bin/ipc-daemon2.exe it immediately exits, no error message is printed,
> > i hav
I have updated the version of cron on cygwin.com to 3.0.1-17.
This version solves a package bug. -16 was mistakenly packed with
paths prepended by "./". There's no change in functionality.
To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on
the http://cygwin.com/ web page.
38 matches
Mail list logo
