RE: File permission problem

Oh...yes, it really related. Is there any way to resolve this? If not, how can I change my home to other local drive? -Original Message- From: Peter Rehley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 12:38 To: 'cygwin' Subject: Re: File permission problem This sound suspi

Is regtool -K option broken?

I tried using regtool's option to use a different key separator, but it doesn't seem to work. Am I doing something wrong? $ regtool --key-separator='|' list |HKLM Unknown key prefix. Valid prefixes are: root HKCR HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT config HKCC HKEY

RE: File permission problem

No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related? -Original Message- From: Peter Rehley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 12:38 To: 'cygwin' Subject: Re: File permission problem This sound suspiciously like the files are on a FAT32 file partition. Are they?

Re: File permission problem

This sound suspiciously like the files are on a FAT32 file partition. Are they? On Sep 23, 2004, at 8:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes. But I have already export the environment variable "ntsec" and restart cygwin. But chmod still doesn't work. Do I need to run any server in order to activa

RE: File permission problem

Yes. But I have already export the environment variable "ntsec" and restart cygwin. But chmod still doesn't work. Do I need to run any server in order to activate the change? Jacky -Original Message- From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 10:52 To: J

Cygwin/DOS pipes, TCP/IP

Hi, I'm trying to download a page until an expression (server doesn't accept ranges): curl -N url | sed -u "/expression/q" > file Sed finds the expression, then exits, breaks pipe, interrupts curl (it produces a writing error message), the file contains expected result. Nice, but it downloads mu

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:34:13AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet. Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam. I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only need to display the mail,

Re: File permission problem

At 09:59 PM 9/23/2004, you wrote: >Dear all, > >I have try to generate a private key file so that I don't need >to enter password everytime I "ssh" to a remote machine. However, "ssh" >complaints me about the permission of key file. I don't know why "chmod" >always return 666 or 444 even I want

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:34:13AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Hello Andrew, > >>> there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet. > >> Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam. > >I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only >need to display the mai

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Hello Andrew, >> there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet. > Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam. I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only need to display the mail, not working as a database server. I tried again to get dbmail up and

File permission problem

Dear all, I have try to generate a private key file so that I don't need to enter password everytime I "ssh" to a remote machine. However, "ssh" complaints me about the permission of key file. I don't know why "chmod" always return 666 or 444 even I want to change the file to 600 or 400.

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hello Andrew, You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with filtering. Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL database as well as bouncing most of them on my l

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > >> You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm > >> getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with > >> filtering. > > > Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL > > database as well as bouncing most of

Re: New packge: lighttpd-1.3.0

"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > > Hmm, looking at it again I see that you may be right. I was having > > problems with it not finding libxml2 (which on cygwin is just > > /usr/lib/libxml2.dll.a and .la) but it appears that all the others are > > extraneous. They must have been remnants left over of v

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Hello Andrew, >> You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm >> getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with >> filtering. > Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL > database as well as bouncing most of them on my little 3

Re: New packge: lighttpd-1.3.0

Hello Brian, Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 23:34 schriebst du: > "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: >> I dislike this, as long as they use libtool we should try to use it. > It wasn't my first choice either. I tried to find a "libtool > --mode=link" command line that would take the specified *.lo

Re: Same code, same script, different results

Mikael Åsberg wrote: > Anyway, it's working as expected now. But to tell the truth I don't know > exactly what the problem was. I tinkered some with the script, did a make > clean ; make (again), and, voila, it works. I'm glad that it works, but it's > a bit annoying not understanding what the pro

Re: Inheriting parent ACLs?

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gabe Rosenhouse wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:21:17 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: , now with more reasons. > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > On Sep 23 16:45, Igor Pechtchansk

Re: Cygwin processes getting stuck on max CPU usage; XP SP2 problem?

Simon Barnes wrote: Some of my colleagues and I are seeing this without using Process Explorer. No doubt some other automated process is triggering it, but we don't know which. Is there anything I can do to help work towards a fix? It's moderately inconvenient having to restart rxvt or bash eve

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Two new mailing lists

Andrew Schulman wrote: As somebody who uses gmane instead of email lists, I cannot find these new lists on gmane. Any idea if they will be automagically included or does somebody need to notify the gmane site? Someone needs to ask the gmane admins to add the lists. Oh. OK. I thought about it but

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo Richard, Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 18:12 schriebst du: To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need another PC just to filter my emails... I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook plugin; SpamBayes also integra

Attn: FAQ [Was: CYGWIN + APCHE + Net::SMTP]

Prakash Khemani wrote: > > Yes. Setting the SYSTEMROOT environment variable in Apach'e CGI > environment did it. "Thou shalt not unset SYSTEMROOT" is a good > commandment to stick with. > > Thanks everybody for the excellent help! Since this has come up a few times recently and is somewhat non-o

Re: Inheriting parent ACLs?

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:21:17 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Sep 23 16:45, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gabe Rosenhouse wrote: > > > > Is there a global setting to cause every file and director

Re: New packge: lighttpd-1.3.0

"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > I dislike this, as long as they use libtool we should try to use it. It wasn't my first choice either. I tried to find a "libtool --mode=link" command line that would take the specified *.lo files and produce a .dll, but I could not find a way. It just seemed silly to

Re: Inheriting parent ACLs?

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 23 16:45, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gabe Rosenhouse wrote: > > > Is there a global setting to cause every file and directory created in > > > Cygwin to simply inherit the Windows ACL of its parent directory? > > > > No.

Re: Inheriting parent ACLs?

On Sep 23 16:45, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gabe Rosenhouse wrote: > > Is there a global setting to cause every file and directory created in > > Cygwin to simply inherit the Windows ACL of its parent directory? > > No. > Igor You meant "nontsec", right? Corinna -- C

Re: Cygwin processes getting stuck on max CPU usage; XP SP2 problem?

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Simon Barnes wrote: > > If you have symbols installed and you list the threads for the hung > > Cygwin process you'll see the stuck one is in a loop in > > ntdll.dll!RtlConvertUiListToApiList, as well as a corresponding thread > > in csrss.exe (CSRSRV.dll!ValidateMessageString

Re: Inheriting parent ACLs?

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gabe Rosenhouse wrote: > Hello. I have a couple questions regarding > > > Windows Explorer will inherit the permissions of the > > parent directory by default, whereas Cygwin will always create a new set > > of ACLs (or, at least, I haven't found a way to make Cygwin director

gcc >= 3.3.3-3 and binutils .rdata alignment

This is just a heads up for anyone compiling with gcc >= 3.3.3-3 and <= current Cygwin binutils (2.15.91 20040725). The issue fixed in the reference below may also affect constant long long or double derrived data structures since -malign-double is gcc's default on Cygwin: http://sources.redhat.c

Re: CYGWIN + APCHE + Net::SMTP

On Sep 23 11:00, Prakash Khemani wrote: > > Yes. Setting the SYSTEMROOT environment variable in Apach'e CGI > environment did it. "Thou shalt not unset SYSTEMROOT" is a good > commandment to stick with. We should put it into the FAQ, perhaps... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Plea

Re: Cygwin processes getting stuck on max CPU usage; XP SP2 problem?

Some of my colleagues and I are seeing this without using Process Explorer. No doubt some other automated process is triggering it, but we don't know which. Is there anything I can do to help work towards a fix? It's moderately inconvenient having to restart rxvt or bash every few hours. Simon

Re: Two new mailing lists

Hello Andrew, >>> See for more details >>> on the >>> two lists. >> > As somebody who uses gmane instead of email lists, I cannot find these > new lists on gmane. Any idea if they will be automagically included or > does somebody need to notify the g

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Two new mailing lists

> As somebody who uses gmane instead of email lists, I cannot find these > new lists on gmane. Any idea if they will be automagically included or > does somebody need to notify the gmane site? Someone needs to ask the gmane admins to add the lists. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com

Re: special install

On Sep 23, 2004, at 11:36 AM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Peter Rehley wrote (heavily [snip]ped): 3) passwd file. If the same users exist on each machine, then this isn't an issue. This is *wrong* (and is the main reason I'm sending this mesage, actually). WinNT/2k/XP machines

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Two new mailing lists

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: There are two new Cygwin mailing lists available: cygwin-licensing - a moderated list for discussion about Cygwin's licensing. Cool!!! cygwin-talk - an unmoderated, almost-anything-goes, almost-nothing-is-offtopic list for dis

Re: special install

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 02:40:46PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >- The /etc symlinks This obviously assumes a consistent setup. Don't try this if you are moving between Windows XP and Windows ME. I suspect this is not an issue. >- The "rm /rf c:\tmp\cygwin1.dll". :-D I included the instruct

Inheriting parent ACLs?

Hello. I have a couple questions regarding > Windows Explorer will inherit the permissions of the > parent directory by default, whereas Cygwin will always create a new set > of ACLs (or, at least, I haven't found a way to make Cygwin directories > inherit the parent's ACLs). from the recent th

Re: special install

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >[snip] > > something like this should still work, though (untested): > > > > 1) > > On the reference system: > > > > mount -m > mounts.bat > > cd / > > tar -cjf /cygdrive/c/cygwin.tar.bz2 --ex

Re: Same code, same script, different results

Mikael Åsberg wrote: Lol, you're right, Igor, that test case was far from minimal. Should've cut it down, of course. On the other hand, I often see people cutting away what they think is unrelated code or whatnot, when, in fact, they are cutting away the cause of their problems when posting que

Re: special install

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:26:50PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, J. David Boyd wrote: > > > >> "Calman, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Our group is interested in installing cygwin on a group

Re: special install

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Peter Rehley wrote (heavily [snip]ped): > On Sep 23, 2004, at 10:32 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > > > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of J. David Boyd > > > > > > After you have a working installation on any computer, you can zip > > > and copy the C:\CYGWIN directory. It is totally

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Hello Reini, > PCYMTNQREAIYR does not help for me, since I'm FAQ author and perl cpan > author. this is a bad combination. I'm Cygwin package maintainer, this is a bad combi too. Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http:

Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Generally speaking, no measure is completely spam-proof, except complete erasure of e-mail addresses (which will conflict with any other legitimate use of "@" on the list). Spamming is more or less an industry now, and one can imagine an industrious spammer (or spam har

RE: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

> > > > Hmm. I wonder if I just replaced all of the '@'s with a png > of an '@', > > if that would foil the spammers. > > > > Nope. Wouldn't work for the text archives. > > > > Sorry, been working on standards compliance of my web site > but it seems > to me that you left off the closing !

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Hallo Richard, Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 18:12 schriebst du: >> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need >> another PC just to filter my emails... > I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook > plugin; SpamBayes also integrates with p

Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: _Now_ is it on-topic? :-) I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which have only been used to send email to mailing lists which munge addresses with the "me at cgf dot cx" method, so this

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Spamming is more or less an industry now, ... All what clients can do about spam is to completely ignore all emails which are not from known senders, so you get just some crap through the lists, even no personal replies to some list postings if you have the sender not white

RE: CYGWIN + APCHE + Net::SMTP

Yes. Setting the SYSTEMROOT environment variable in Apach'e CGI environment did it. "Thou shalt not unset SYSTEMROOT" is a good commandment to stick with. Thanks everybody for the excellent help! Regards, Prakash > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O

Re: special install

On Sep 23, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Dave Korn wrote: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter Rehley Sent: 23 September 2004 18:44 Much snippage, just to summarize the essence of the post and it's role in the conversation: After you have a working installation on any computer

RE: special install

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter Rehley > Sent: 23 September 2004 18:44 Much snippage, just to summarize the essence of the post and it's role in the conversation: > On Sep 23, 2004, at 10:32 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > > >> -Original Message- > >> From

RE: special install

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: 23 September 2004 18:42 > There are probably some details that I forgot and some other minor > cleanups to worry about but I don't see why the above shouldn't > work, at least in principle. Heh. Not quit

Re: special install

On Sep 23, 2004, at 10:32 AM, Dave Korn wrote: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of J. David Boyd Sent: 23 September 2004 18:16 "Calman, Jack" writes: Hi, Our group is interested in installing cygwin on a group of classified computers that are not connected to the internet.

Re: special install

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:26:50PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, J. David Boyd wrote: > >> "Calman, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >, now with more reasons. > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Our group is interested in installing cygwin on

Re: special install

"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of J. David Boyd > > Sent: 23 September 2004 18:16 > > > "Calman, Jack" writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Our group is interested in installing cygwin on a group of > > classified > > > com

RE: special install

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of J. David Boyd > Sent: 23 September 2004 18:16 > "Calman, Jack" writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Our group is interested in installing cygwin on a group of > classified > > computers that are not connected to the internet. Would you > ple

Re: special install

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, J. David Boyd wrote: > "Calman, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: , now with more reasons. > > Hi, > > > > Our group is interested in installing cygwin on a group of classified > > computers that are not connected to the internet.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Two new mailing lists

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > There are two new Cygwin mailing lists available: > > cygwin-licensing - a moderated list for discussion about Cygwin's > licensing. Cool!!! > cygwin-talk - an unmoderated, almost-anything-goes, > almost-nothing-is-offtopic list for discussing alm

Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > >>>Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40 > >> > >>>On Thu,

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:55:29PM -0400, LDR wrote: >I receive the Cygwin email lists in digest format. > >The email addresses are preserved in these. > >Isn't this unnecessary exposure? > >Can't names be harvested by subscribing to the list and then harvesting >new addresses from each new digest

Re: special install

"Calman, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Our group is interested in installing cygwin on a group of classified > computers that are not connected to the internet. Would you please tell me > how to download what I need from the internet. Then I'll put it on a CD, > carry it into the c

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Two new mailing lists

There are two new Cygwin mailing lists available: cygwin-licensing - a moderated list for discussion about Cygwin's licensing. cygwin-talk - an unmoderated, almost-anything-goes, almost-nothing-is-offtopic list for discussing almost anything vaguely related to Cygwin without the threat of "this i

Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: >>>-Original Message- >>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor >>>Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40 >> >>>On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: _Now_ i

Re: cygwin, libtool, dlpreopen, and .rdata

Charles Wilson wrote: Actually, *function* addresses are fine; they don't get relocated (at least, not by the runtime-pseudo-reloc gobbledygook). It's only the addresses of DATA items exported by DLLs that get relocated in this way. AND, they get relocated IF AND ONLY IF you are linking to a DL

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, LDR wrote: > I receive the Cygwin email lists in digest format. > > The email addresses are preserved in these. > > Isn't this unnecessary exposure? > Can't names be harvested by subscribing to the list and then harvesting new > addresses from each new digest? You're giving w

RE: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Igor Pechtchanski > > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:43 > > > > > You mean, like "`banner -c@ @`"? ;-) > > ISTM that http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YOWTWYWT ! > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/> `banner -c@ @` > > > bash: :

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR

I receive the Cygwin email lists in digest format. The email addresses are preserved in these. Isn't this unnecessary exposure? Can't names be harvested by subscribing to the list and then harvesting new addresses from each new digest? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscrib

RE: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

> -Original Message- > From: Igor Pechtchanski > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:43 > > > You mean, like "`banner -c@ @`"? ;-) ISTM that http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YOWTWYWT ! > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/> `banner -c@ @` > > bash: : command not found > > > > AAARRRGHGHGHGHG!!!1!!

RE: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Hughes, Bill wrote: > [various recipes for spammer treatment snipped] > > Next job is to work out how to use fetchmail+procmail+postfix+... to help me > not to have to play whack a mole quite so much. > > I'm grateful to the this list (can't remember who in particular) for tel

RE: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Umm, given the subject, this is particularly vile. :-D > > Sent: 23 September 2004 16:44 > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > > > > > -Original Message- >

RE: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Dave Korn wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase >> Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09 > >> We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar >> method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet. >> > > > Nahh. What we really

RE: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase > > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09 > > > We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar > > method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet. > > Nah

RE: Same code, same script, different results

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dave Korn > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:24 > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mikael Åsberg > > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:19 > > PS. I remember once having the cygwin mailing list in "usenet > > style

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > To filter out spam at the client side is not possible... Well, aside from an occasional simpleton who gets duped into replying to a spam message, the main danger of spam is the mass e-mailing aspect that ties up computer and network resources. So I g

RE: Same code, same script, different results

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mikael Åsberg > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:19 > PS. I remember once having the cygwin mailing list in "usenet > style format" > in outlook express, but I can't for the life of me remember > what I did. > Anyone knows what I'm talk

RE: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09 > We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar > method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet. > Nahh. What we really need are not rules; what we ne

Re: Same code, same script, different results

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Mikael Åsberg wrote: Hello, I am using the latest Cygwin with all packages updated (running Windows XP Professional SP2) and I'm having a problem with a simple C++ program that uses the Win32 API to scan a directory (recursively or non-recursively, depending on user input). The

RE: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

> -Original Message- > From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 September 2004 16:44 > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > > > Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40 > > > > > > H

RE: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need > another PC just to filter my emails... I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook plugin; SpamBayes also integrates with procmail and about a million other things). http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/

Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

Hello Igor, > Spamming is more or less an industry now, ... All what clients can do about spam is to completely ignore all emails which are not from known senders, so you get just some crap through the lists, even no personal replies to some list postings if you have the sender not whitelisted, s

Re: Same code, same script, different results

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Mikael Åsberg wrote: > Hello, I am using the latest Cygwin with all packages updated (running > Windows XP Professional SP2) and I'm having a problem with a simple C++ > program that uses the Win32 API to scan a directory (recursively or > non-recursively, depending on user in

RE: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > > Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40 > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > > >_Now_ is it on-topic? > > > > :-) > > > > I have to point out that I'm

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: tetex-2.0.2-14

> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > The tetex suite hase been updated to version 2.0.2-14. This is a > bugfix release. > Changes > tetex-bin (2.0.2-14) > * Fix xdvi script (reported by Gregory Borota). This package has adopted again the old /usr/doc structure :-(

RE: Latest snapshot with XP SP2 and unison and cvs

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Karl M > > Sent: 22 September 2004 19:36 > > > Hi Dave... > > > > Sorry, I thought I covered all details, but... > > > > The firewall is off...I am behind a real firewall. > > > > The hanging

RE: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40 > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > >_Now_ is it on-topic? > > :-) > > I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which > have only bee

Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > >From http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.shtml > > " Major Findings > > Our analysis indicated that e-mail addresses posted on Web sites or in > newsgroups attract the most spam. > Web Sites - CDT received the most e-mails when an address was p

special install

Hi, Our group is interested in installing cygwin on a group of classified computers that are not connected to the internet. Would you please tell me how to download what I need from the internet. Then I'll put it on a CD, carry it into the classified room, and then install on the computers there.

Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >_Now_ is it on-topic? :-) I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which have only been used to send email to mailing lists which munge addresses with the "me at cgf dot cx" method, so this isn't foolproof. Hmm.

Re: Lot of undefined symbols at link time, even with -l option on good libraries

Frédéric ORMANCEY wrote: > Thanks for this sample code => we are not far of the solution ! > > Same sample compile on my platform gives the following : > V:>gnatmake imp > gnatbind -x imp.ali > gnatlink imp.ali > ./imp.o(.text+0x20):imp.adb: undefined reference to `_FormatMessage

Re: New packge: lighttpd-1.3.0

Hallo Brian, Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 15:38 schriebst du: > "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: >> >> Hello Brian, >> >> >> I have a flag here: >> >> --enable-embed=TYPE EXPERIMENTAL: Enable building of embedded SAPI library >> >> TYPE is either 'shared' or 'static'

Message deleted

Scanner: MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 Problem description: Email data: MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Is that your document? Scanning part [] Scanning part [document.exe] Attachment validity check: passed. Virus identity found: W32/N

Same code, same script, different results

Hello, I am using the latest Cygwin with all packages updated (running Windows XP Professional SP2) and I'm having a problem with a simple C++ program that uses the Win32 API to scan a directory (recursively or non-recursively, depending on user input). The code is as follows: #include #includ

Re: New packge: lighttpd-1.3.0

"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > > Hello Brian, > > >> I have a flag here: > >> --enable-embed=TYPE EXPERIMENTAL: Enable building of embedded SAPI library > >> TYPE is either 'shared' or 'static'. TYPE=shared > >> > >> is this new in php-5? Lets see what happens when I defi

Re: Lot of undefined symbols at link time, even with -l option on good libraries

Thanks for this sample code => we are not far of the solution ! Same sample compile on my platform gives the following : V:>gnatmake imp gnatbind -x imp.ali gnatlink imp.ali ./imp.o(.text+0x20):imp.adb: undefined reference to `_FormatMessageA' collect2: ld returned 1 exit st

Re: Request for subsystem 'sftp' failed

> Have a look into /etc/sshd_config. Is the path to sftp-server correct? There was an error in the path (very stupid of me). Now everything works. Thanks a lot. Siegmar -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Doc

Re: New packge: lighttpd-1.3.0

Hello Brian, >> I have a flag here: >> --enable-embed=TYPE EXPERIMENTAL: Enable building of embedded SAPI library >> TYPE is either 'shared' or 'static'. TYPE=shared >> >> is this new in php-5? Lets see what happens when I define it. > No, it's the same in php4, and

Re: Request for subsystem 'sftp' failed

On Sep 23 14:02, Siegmar Gross wrote: > Hi, > > I've configured OpenSSh with public-key authentication. I can use ssh > without problems. My scripts don't have any unwanted outputs ("ssh localhost > /usr/bin/true" displays nothing). Unfortunately sftp doesn't work. I've > looked up the mailing lis

RE: Lot of undefined symbols at link time, even with -l option on good libraries

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Cliff Hones > Sent: 22 September 2004 23:38 > That was me - but it seems Dave Korn's post broke the thread. Nah. My post had this header: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and as you can see perfectly clearly at http://www.cygw

[OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works.

>From http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.shtml " Major Findings Our analysis indicated that e-mail addresses posted on Web sites or in newsgroups attract the most spam. Web Sites - CDT received the most e-mails when an address was placed visibly on a public Web site. Spammers use

RE: CYGWIN + APCHE + Net::SMTP

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Prakash Khemani > Sent: 22 September 2004 23:30 > Prakash Khemani wrote: > > I also have apache2 running in my cygwin environment. When I run > mail.pl > > as a CGI script it is not able to connect to the the smtp > server. The > > S

Request for subsystem 'sftp' failed

Hi, I've configured OpenSSh with public-key authentication. I can use ssh without problems. My scripts don't have any unwanted outputs ("ssh localhost /usr/bin/true" displays nothing). Unfortunately sftp doesn't work. I've looked up the mailing list and searched in the web but without success. Tod

  1   2   >