Blair P. Houghton wrote:
The people who were crazy enough to leave their email
addresses in perl's cygwin installation docs aren't
being helpful (unless you call reflexive BOFH-grade
whining helpful). You'd think they'd understand not to
make themselves available as POC if they're not POC.
G
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:13:00PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>I believe that the latest snapshot is "as secure as Windows" in the case
>where the only Cygwin processes are logged in using Terminal Services
>on Windows 2003 or Windows 2000 sp4, and do not have the "Create Global
>Object" privi
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:53:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 04:31:57PM -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> >I like your sarcasm, but I prefer to assume that the only truly secure
> >network is one without computers attached, and the only truly
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 04:31:57PM -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
>>trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
>>Microsoft.
>
>I like your sarcasm, but I prefer to assume that the onl
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:39:04AM +, Arash Partow wrote:
>I don't see how your sarcastic remarks relate to what i said...
>
>>Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
>>trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
>>Microsoft.
>
>all i said was
I don't see how your sarcastic remarks relate to what i said...
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
all i said was that its harder to prove something in a negative
context rather than a p
Roy Clemmons wrote:
> libxx.dll.a is the import library
> cygxx-1.dll is the dll
>
> Read
> http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html
> for a more complete explanation.Thanks for the reply. Unless I missed
> it, I still don't understand why the shared lib was created a "cyg"
> prefix and a -
I wanted to add threading to perl, so I snarfed the
5.8.2 distro and tried to build it. I got through
Configure (not without a little Space Ace flashback,
mind you), but when I did make(1) it went down into the
B-module build and croaked. The error message is shown
below.
I hacked around in
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
I like your sarcasm, but I prefer to assume that the only truly secure
network is one without computers attached, and the on
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:54:43PM +, Arash Partow wrote:
>proving a negative is much harder than proving a positive...
Yeah. You're right. It's better to just assume it's gloriously
trustworthy if it's free software and maliciously bad if it comes from
Microsoft.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info:
proving a negative is much harder than proving a positive...
Arash Partow
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
Jim Ramsay wrote:
Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem
running Windows on a 'secure' network.
To a person with that mentality, Bi
Hi Corinna,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:01:06 +0100 you wrote:
>while I appreciate the work you've put into this project, I don't think
>it's the way to go to stick with the current version of ssmtp and only
>change it that much for Cygwin.
>
>The mainline version of ssmtp is currently 2.60.4 (see
>f
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
>Jim Ramsay wrote:
>>Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem
>>running Windows on a 'secure' network.
>
>To a person with that mentality, Bill Gates is implicitly trustworthy
>(i.e. if he says it's true, it m
Jim Ramsay wrote:
Ha! Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem
running Windows on a 'secure' network.
To a person with that mentality, Bill Gates is implicitly trustworthy
(i.e. if he says it's true, it must be true by definition, because it's
a "big company that stands
mauro zallocco wrote:
I noticed that the resulting Test.exe attempts to access the internet.
Is this expected ?
Its trying to access 24.25.4.107 which my getHost tool tells me is
rlghnc-dns-cac-02-dmfe1.nc.rr.com.
It's not unexpected or incorrect, but may be suboptimal.
This host is obviously you
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:29:25PM +0100, Gabriel SOUBIES wrote:
I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it.
But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no
security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network.
Cygwin i
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> Sorry for the delay...
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:26:07AM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
> > I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll
> > and the modules in /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/*.dll, and that this breaks
>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:29:25PM +0100, Gabriel SOUBIES wrote:
>I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it.
>But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no
>security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network.
Cygwin is not secure. It's a give
Ivan,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:47:19AM -0500, Petric, Ivan wrote:
> please unsubscribe me...thanks!
Sorry, I don't have the authority, but you do!
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Rafael,
Sorry for the delay...
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:38:03AM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
> I noticed that the /bin/rebaseall script assumes the following:
>
> DefaultBaseAddress=0x7000
> DefaultOffset=0x1
>
> Is this going to be the standard base and offset for DLLs in Cygwin?
I
Rafael,
Sorry for the delay...
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:26:07AM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
> I noticed that the rebaseall scripts rebases /usr/bin/libzsh-4.0.4.dll
> and the modules in /usr/lib/zsh/4.1.1/zsh/*.dll, and that this breaks
> zsh. Rebasing libzsh stops zsh from starting, and rebas
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi all,
in my attempts to fix an ugly bug in kaffe on Cygwin, the bug I'm
trying to squish turned out to be triggered by something that happens
*before* main is called.
Since I'd like to know what modifes that opcode, I hope to be able to
set a bre
libxx.dll.a is the import library
cygxx-1.dll is the dll
Read
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html
for a more complete explanation.Thanks for the reply. Unless I missed
it, I still don't understand why the shared lib was created a "cyg"
prefix and a -1 suffix. But, be that as it may, c
Hi everybody!
I've been using Cygwin for a while and am really happy with it.
But recently my paranoid boss has asked me to prove him that there was no
security problem with using Cygwin on our secure network.
The first step towards this goal is to recompile Cygwin so that we can be
sure the code w
Patrick,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:05:20AM -0800, Patrick Samson wrote:
> Postgresql's configure --with-tcl uses
> /lib/tclConfig.sh to know how to link with TCL. But in
> package tcltk version 20030901-1, usr/lib/tclConfig.sh
> contains:
> TCL_LIB_SPEC=''
> so something required by Postgres isn'
Kimberlie,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:23:36PM -0500, Kimberlie S wrote:
> I tried using rebase (suggested by Jason Tishler in his email dated
> Tue, 02 Dec 2003) but just get an error message saying that bash is
> not rebaseable.
Assuming this is a rebase problem, then you need to rebase your sy
Hi Jeff,
while I appreciate the work you've put into this project, I don't think
it's the way to go to stick with the current version of ssmtp and only
change it that much for Cygwin.
The mainline version of ssmtp is currently 2.60.4 (see
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles) and I think
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:30:44PM +0800, Hu Ying wrote:
>Just now I tried to install the arm-elf-tools-cygwin. The system just
>gave an information "Bad, You are not root". Is it a bug or anything
>else?
Why are you asking us? Why not ask the people who provided you with
arm-elf-tools-cygwin?
Roy Clemmons wrote:
Greetings,
Using Cygwin 1.5.5-1, I am porting a Unix shared library to Windows.
After making and linking the library with libtool, two DLLs were
created:
libxx.dll.a
cygxx-1.dll
libxx.dll.a is the import library
cygxx-1.dll is the dll
Read
http://cygwin.com/
>
> Greetings,
>
> Using Cygwin 1.5.5-1, I am porting a Unix shared library to Windows.
> After making and linking the library with libtool, two DLLs were
> created:
>
> libxx.dll.a
> cygxx-1.dll
>
> I guess I was only expecting: libxx.dll.
>
> Why were the 2 names generated and w
Windows XP/Pro SP1 cygwin P4 system with these packages:
binutils 20030901-1 2.14.90 20030901
bison20030307-1 1.875b
cygwin 1.5.5-1
dejagnu 20021217-2 1.4.2.x
gawk 3.1.3-4
gcc
Greetings,
Using Cygwin 1.5.5-1, I am porting a Unix shared library to Windows.
After making and linking the library with libtool, two DLLs were
created:
libxx.dll.a
cygxx-1.dll
I guess I was only expecting: libxx.dll.
Why were the 2 names generated and why the "cyg" prefix on one o
Hi,
Just now I tried to install the arm-elf-tools-cygwin. The system just
gave an information "Bad, You are not root". Is it a bug or anything else?
Regards
Hu Ying
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Do
Hi,
I am getting the following on running query on cron service:
-
$ cygrunsrv.exe -Q cron
Service cron exists
Type: Own Process
Current State : Stopped
Controls Accepted :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
$ cygrunsrv.exe
34 matches
Mail list logo
