Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr & FLAGS)" failed:

On Sunday 05 May 2002 21:49, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Tim" == Tim Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tim> The binutils alignment parameter in coff-i386.c is set to 4-byte > Tim> alignment. 4-byte alignment also is the default for gcc -Os, at > Tim> least from gcc-3.1. Cases have been produ

RE: Cygwin reliability

Thanks Harold I have joined up with a few lists but never see much traffice for some Mike -Original Message- From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 May 2002 15:40 To: Linux; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cygx Subject: RE: Cygwin reliability Mike, Yes, you missed something.

Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr & FLAGS)" failed:

> "Tim" == Tim Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tim> The binutils alignment parameter in coff-i386.c is set to 4-byte Tim> alignment. 4-byte alignment also is the default for gcc -Os, at Tim> least from gcc-3.1. Cases have been produced where gcc-3.1 Tim> failed to give 16-byte alignment

RE: Cygwin reliability

Mike, Yes, you missed something. The mailing list for Cygwin/XFree86 questions is [EMAIL PROTECTED], not [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've redirected your question there. Harold > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Linux > Sent: Sunday, May 05,

Cygwin reliability

Hi I have been using Cygwin for the last 4 months now and find it reasonably good to use, however. I have been having continuous problems getting it to connect to the server box. The configuration is Server: Redhat 7.2 (was7.1) running xdm > Win2K Server. Sometimes it will connect sometimes it wo

I am asthonished

In the first hand, i dunno if that comes from my browsers by i have two different version of http://cygwin.com When I am using mozilla, i got an updated one, and when I use IE I have an old one. The second point, i would like to underline is that the port of bitchx is not a new thing, i used it

Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr & FLAGS)" failed:

On Sunday 05 May 2002 16:49, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote: > cygwin readers: This is about porting java to cygwin for gcc-3.2 > (and perhaps gcc-3.1.1 if the changes are small). > > So we need objects to be 8-byte aligned so that the low three bits > of the address are 0? Are there any ways

Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr & FLAGS)" failed:

> "David" == Billinghurst, David (CRTS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> So we need objects to be 8-byte aligned so that the low three David> bits of the address are 0? Are there any ways around this, as David> I don't think that this is the default on cygwin. For libgcj this decision is

Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr & FLAGS)" failed:

cygwin readers: This is about porting java to cygwin for gcc-3.2 (and perhaps gcc-3.1.1 if the changes are small). So we need objects to be 8-byte aligned so that the low three bits of the address are 0? Are there any ways around this, as I don't think that this is the default on cygwin. I

Re: perl -i is dangerous !

Thanks for your answers and work. Regards, Marc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: New snapshot with significant new functionality

On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:54:37PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Chris, Chris, Chris, > >Here are a couple of alternate ideas: > >1) Require a mount to access /proc (or just /proc/registry). >From my Thu, 2 May 2002 22:47:31 -0400 mail: >Long term, this kind of stuff should be somehow "mountabl

RE: New snapshot with significant new functionality

Chris, Chris, Chris, Here are a couple of alternate ideas: 1) Require a mount to access /proc (or just /proc/registry). Use a mount-time option to enable writability of the registry portion of /proc (an option to the mount command and a bit in the __flags argument to the mount system call).

Re: setup.exe pre-release update

Unfortunately, I'm having the same results with this update (setup-md5-20020504.exe, v2.218.2.2) as I did with the first snapshot (setup-md5-20020501.exe, v2.216). It still leaks memory on the progress window until the process disappears without any warning. The same thing happens whether I

Cygwin reliability

Hi I have been using Cygwin for the last 4 months now and find it reasonably good to use, however. I have been having continuous problems getting it to connect to the server box. The configuration is Server: Redhat 7.2 (was7.1) running xdm > Win2K Server. Sometimes it will connect sometimes it wo

RE: New snapshot with significant new functionality

On Fri, 3 May 2002, Robert Collins wrote: > Two things: if /proc/registry isn't writable, cating 1 to > /proc/registry/.writeable won't work - without special case code. I'd > suggest /proc/sysopts/fs/registry/writeable. > > Two, why not have two options: > writeable > nextwrite > > one is persi

Re: getdomainname

Hallo Christopher, Am 2002-05-04 um 04:14 schriebst du: > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:56:44PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>Hallo, >> >>I found this entry in the ChangeLogs: >>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2002-q1/msg00120.html >> >>so getdomainname() exists obviously, >>now I wonder

1.3.10: RE: Impossible to exit rxvt, now

Sorry, regarding my last email I forgot to mention that those problems seem to be caused by this tty (quite standard) setup in my /etc/profile: stty intr ^c susp ^z start ^q stop ^s quit ^\\ erase ^? Livio -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: