Re: towards compilability with non-ghc

2007-05-29 Thread Isaac Dupree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Malcolm Wallace wrote: > Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> know how close GHC's stage1 code >> is to compilability with other compilers? > > AFAIK, ghc's source code primarily uses only two main extensions beyond > the Haskell language - u

Re: towards compilability with non-ghc

2007-05-28 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > know how close GHC's stage1 code > is to compilability with other compilers? AFAIK, ghc's source code primarily uses only two main extensions beyond the Haskell language - unboxed values, and pattern guards. To a large extent, GHCi will also rely on havi

towards compilability with non-ghc

2007-05-27 Thread Isaac Dupree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone mind if I make utils/Fast* implement versions that work equivalently on compilers other than GHC? (utils/FastTypes already had an old broken one which I fixed). Or know how close GHC's stage1 code is to compilability with other compilers (