| > Agreed. I compared the new codegen with the old codegen (on nofib) before
| > I left Microsoft, and I recall a minor uptick in compile times. I haven't
| > looked into the causes yet.
| >
|
| Are we expecting a /decrease/ in runtime now though? :-)
Probably not yet. All of this work has posit
November 2008 09:24
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: John Dias; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: new codegen patches
|
| Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| > Oops. where is mkSECAFBlackHoleInfoTableLabel' defined?
|
| Looks like a merge problem - I removed the SE blackhole variants
recently.
dias:
> >How's your defence preparation going?
>
> The defense is finished and went well. I expect to wrap up my revisions
> next week.
>
> >What's the flag to switch on the new path?
>
> For reasons that are no long obvious to me, there used to be two flags,
> but after I submit my next patch
How's your defence preparation going?
The defense is finished and went well. I expect to wrap up my revisions
next week.
What's the flag to switch on the new path?
For reasons that are no long obvious to me, there used to be two flags,
but after I submit my next patch (after validating),
---
| From: Simon Marlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Marlow
| Sent: 26 November 2008 09:24
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: John Dias; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: new codegen patches
|
| Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| > Oops. where is mkSECAFBlackHoleInfoTableLabel' defin
ah ok I see what to do. I'll send a patch shortly
S
| -Original Message-
| From: Simon Marlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Marlow
| Sent: 26 November 2008 09:24
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: John Dias; cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: new codegen patches
|
|
g
| Subject: new codegen patches
|
| As you may have noticed, I have finally pushed a large number of patches
| for the new code generator. The new codegen is still off by default, so
| for the most part, this patch should not have any effect on compiled
| programs. I validated the patches, but pleas
Label'
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dias
| Sent: 26 November 2008 05:32
| To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: new codegen patches
|
| As you may have noticed, I have finally pushed a large number of patches
| for the new code ge
MAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dias
| Sent: 26 November 2008 05:32
| To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org
| Subject: new codegen patches
|
| As you may have noticed, I have finally pushed a large number of patches
| for the new code generator. The new codegen is still off by default, so
|
As you may have noticed, I have finally pushed a large number of patches
for the new code generator. The new codegen is still off by default, so
for the most part, this patch should not have any effect on compiled
programs. I validated the patches, but please let me know if there are any
proble
10 matches
Mail list logo
