Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-20 Thread Simon Marlow
Claus Reinke wrote: I just made this binary available from the darcs download page. Here's a link: http://www.haskell.org/~simonmar/darcs-2.0.2+75.zip This is built with curl 7.18.2 and has pipelining enabled. Cheers, Simon Thanks, Simon! I've unpacked the 2.0.0 (with cygwin) package as a

Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-19 Thread Claus Reinke
I just made this binary available from the darcs download page. Here's a link: http://www.haskell.org/~simonmar/darcs-2.0.2+75.zip This is built with curl 7.18.2 and has pipelining enabled. Cheers, Simon Thanks, Simon! I've unpacked the 2.0.0 (with cygwin) package as a basis, but in there

Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-19 Thread Simon Marlow
I just made this binary available from the darcs download page. Here's a link: http://www.haskell.org/~simonmar/darcs-2.0.2+75.zip This is built with curl 7.18.2 and has pipelining enabled. Cheers, Simon Simon Marlow wrote: The attached patches make darcs build on Windows for me using

Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-19 Thread Simon Marlow
The attached patches make darcs build on Windows for me using GHC 6.8.3. I ran 'make test' and most tests passed, except TESTS FAILED! pull.sh which is much better than I've seen before. The threadWaitRead issue is even more subtle than I realised. In fact darcs does respond to ^C,

Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-18 Thread Simon Marlow
Simon Marlow wrote: Claus Reinke wrote: |Do you get this using darcs 2? We would appreciate a bug report! Well, okay, I'd like to switch to darcs 2 (forgot that Simon had already convinced me earlier..). But according to darcs.net: - the latest stable release is 2.0.2 - the latest win

Re: [darcs-users] darcs and ghc..

2008-08-18 Thread Simon Marlow
Claus Reinke wrote: |Do you get this using darcs 2? We would appreciate a bug report! Well, okay, I'd like to switch to darcs 2 (forgot that Simon had already convinced me earlier..). But according to darcs.net: - the latest stable release is 2.0.2 - the latest windows binary bundles a

Re: [darcs-users] darcs and ghc..

2008-08-16 Thread Claus Reinke
|Do you get this using darcs 2? We would appreciate a bug report! Well, okay, I'd like to switch to darcs 2 (forgot that Simon had already convinced me earlier..). But according to darcs.net: - the latest stable release is 2.0.2 - the latest windows binary bundles are 2.0.0 - there i

Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-13 Thread Bryan O'Sullivan
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The earlier we start collecting _concrete_ instances of such silent > command failures, the better. Unfortunately, I can't remember what I was doing at the time, as this occurred a few months ago.

Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-13 Thread Claus Reinke
A number of git commands are implemented as crufty shell scripts that don't check the results of running its plumbing commands. I've been bitten by silent command failure on a number of occasions. Just saying. The earlier we start collecting _concrete_ instances of such silent command failures,

Re: darcs and ghc..

2008-08-12 Thread Bryan O'Sullivan
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much as I'd have liked to advocate darcs 2 over git for ghc, I > couldn't really have justified that until the little bugs are known to > be fixed. A number of git commands are implemented as crufty shell scripts that don'

darcs and ghc..

2008-08-12 Thread Claus Reinke
While I'm nominally a fan of darcs (mostly because it was the first vcs I've seen that is simple when it works, including things like putting repos on webservers, being able to initialize repos without having to read the manual, or being able to see changes without being connected to the reference