agh
Date: Mon Apr 4 17:21:36 2011 +0100
Remove redundant darcs-all script
darcs-all | 437 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 437 deletions(-)
Diff suppressed because of size. To see it, use:
git s
Thu Jan 13 03:16:54 PST 2011 Simon Marlow
* add the -r flag from darcs-all
M ./sync-all -42 +124
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=20110113111654-12142-307446a4cfd81955b870fe1676dd0200ba6fd89d.gz
David,
> Thanks for the info, Manuel. Is the idea to have the DPH packages available
> from darcs-all in the 7.0 branch once patch-level release is ready, or is it
> expected that we would just install the packages from hackage if we want to
> play with DPH on the 7.0 branch?
I
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:32:16AM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
>
> Ian, independent of the omission of DPH from the GHC 7.0.1 release, shouldn't
> the relevant packages not be on the branch?
I can add them. Do you want a symlink to the HEAD repos, or do you want
an actual branch of them
Thanks for the info, Manuel. Is the idea to have the DPH packages available
from darcs-all in the 7.0 branch once patch-level release is ready, or is it
expected that we would just install the packages from hackage if we want to
play with DPH on the 7.0 branch?
I stumbled over this when
depends on the DPH library
infrastructure).
Ian, independent of the omission of DPH from the GHC 7.0.1 release, shouldn't
the relevant packages not be on the branch?
Manuel
David Peixotto:
> I'm trying to get the dph libraries (primitive, vector, dph) using darcs-all
> in the ghc
I'm trying to get the dph libraries (primitive, vector, dph) using darcs-all in
the ghc-7.0 branch. It fails with this error:
darcs failed: Not a repository:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-7.0/packages/primitive
What is the recommended way to get the dph packages from the 7.0 branch?
Fri Oct 15 09:45:49 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh
* Fix boot; it was failing if darcs-all or validate were missing
(which is the case in sdists)
M ./boot -2 +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc-7.0/ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=20101015164549-3fd76
Fri Oct 15 09:45:49 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh
* Fix boot; it was failing if darcs-all or validate were missing
(which is the case in sdists)
M ./boot -2 +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=20101015164549-3fd76
Fri Sep 17 12:44:35 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh
* Tweak darcs-all
M ./darcs-all -1 +26
M ./packages -1 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=20100917194435-3fd76-0d09180b3a25d7ba35c3e8fa4e783ed7b475c5bf.gz
Sun Aug 22 09:34:19 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh
* Add "darcs-all upstreampull"
This pulls from the upstream repos, for those packages which have
upstreams
M ./darcs-all +21
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=2010082216
Sun Aug 22 08:48:13 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh
* Factor out the packages file parsing in darcs-all
M ./darcs-all -61 +70
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=20100822154813-3fd76-406ee39ab8e3e5d7d5fa1b9242a9cafc89cd87c6.gz
Wed Apr 21 10:13:39 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh
* Give the right exit code in darcs-all
Our END block was calling system, which alters $?. So now we save and
restore it.
M ./darcs-all +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc-6.12/ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h
Wed Apr 21 10:13:39 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh
* Give the right exit code in darcs-all
Our END block was calling system, which alters $?. So now we save and
restore it.
M ./darcs-all +4
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=ghc;a=darcs_commitdiff;h
Wed Mar 3 13:59:48 PST 2010 simo...@microsoft.com
* Add comments to darcs-all and packages
M ./darcs-all -18 +18
M ./packages -5 +19
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20100303215948-1287e-6dc34a2d59945f30405a9118b324711c47ca0176.gz
On 18/02/2010 01:53, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Simon Marlow:
Wed Feb 17 02:46:34 PST 2010 Simon Marlow
* darcs-all --extra get: gets a few extra packages
currently deepseq, parallel, stm.
That's a very useful addition, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to work (for
me):
Simon Marlow:
> Wed Feb 17 02:46:34 PST 2010 Simon Marlow
> * darcs-all --extra get: gets a few extra packages
> currently deepseq, parallel, stm.
That's a very useful addition, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to work (for
me):
> limitingfactor chak 5 (.../Code/
Wed Feb 17 02:46:34 PST 2010 Simon Marlow
* darcs-all --extra get: gets a few extra packages
currently deepseq, parallel, stm.
M ./darcs-all +5
M ./packages +3
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20100217104634-12142
Mon Dec 21 08:05:11 PST 2009 simo...@microsoft.com
* Add comments to darcs-all
Ignore-this: 5a369a030785aec6ef0169e36757bba4
The comments explain how darcs-all decides what repo to use
M ./darcs-all +31
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.12/ghc/_darcs/patches
Mon Dec 21 08:05:11 PST 2009 simo...@microsoft.com
* Add comments to darcs-all
Ignore-this: 5a369a030785aec6ef0169e36757bba4
The comments explain how darcs-all decides what repo to use
M ./darcs-all +31
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20091221160511
Wed Nov 11 03:32:01 PST 2009 Simon Marlow
* Make "./darcs-all optimize --relink" do the right thing
Ignore-this: 4d255397c300133e6840d08db09a41f8
M ./darcs-all -2 +8
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/200911
Fri Oct 23 11:15:21 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh
* Add a test to the unpulled patches in darcs-all
M ./darcs-all +15
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.12/ghc/_darcs/patches/20091023181521-3fd76-8f4ae3a4b859a164df9c67b611e5db34eb7c1e4c.gz
Tue Oct 6 13:33:42 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh
* Add a test in darcs-all for old bytestring repositories
M ./darcs-all +18
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.12/ghc/_darcs/patches/20091006203342-3fd76-046b1741337039d044a5cd92d26d8a5c6505d111.gz
Wed Oct 14 09:29:48 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh
* Add tarball syncing to darcs-all
We now use it for libffi and the mingw tarballs
M ./darcs-all -1 +70
A ./tarballs
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.12/ghc/_darcs/patches/20091014162948-3fd76
Fri Oct 23 11:15:21 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh
* Add a test to the unpulled patches in darcs-all
M ./darcs-all +15
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20091023181521-3fd76-8f4ae3a4b859a164df9c67b611e5db34eb7c1e4c.gz
___
Cvs
Wed Oct 14 09:29:48 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh
* Add tarball syncing to darcs-all
We now use it for libffi and the mingw tarballs
M ./darcs-all -1 +70
A ./tarballs
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20091014162948-3fd76
Tue Oct 6 13:33:42 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh
* Add a test in darcs-all for old bytestring repositories
M ./darcs-all +18
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20091006203342-3fd76-046b1741337039d044a5cd92d26d8a5c6505d111.gz
Thu Aug 27 07:15:54 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow
* fix 'darcs-all rec' (amongst other things)
Ignore-this: fb91b85e37c9be9d153f381c27d9d37c
M ./darcs-all -14 +11
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20090827141554-12142-01e84fb44d5c4635a4d4bac8c56b3b36e
Thu Aug 27 06:57:17 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow
* REDO: Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375)
Ignore-this: 270dbe385afb807c32eaa4b02a3f7d7
rolling back:
Mon Aug 3 11:44:13 BST 2009 Simon Marlow
UNDO: Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:23:32PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> I thought the UI was nicer.
>
> ./darcs-all -r ~/ghc-HEAD pull
>
> vs.
>
> ./push-all --pull --checked-out ~/ghc-HEAD
I just have little
./push-monk
./pull-mac
[etc]
wrapper scripts, whi
On 18/08/2009 14:37, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:36:35PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 07/08/2009 16:57, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Mon Aug 3 03:44:13 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow
UNDO: Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375)
Ian - what's the plan for this patch?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:36:35PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 07/08/2009 16:57, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>> Mon Aug 3 03:44:13 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow
>>UNDO: Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375)
>
> Ian - what's the plan for this patch? You pulled
On 07/08/2009 16:57, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Mon Aug 3 03:44:13 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow
UNDO: Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375)
Ian - what's the plan for this patch? You pulled it out without
comment. Meanwhile I had updated some of my scripts to work with the
new
Mon Aug 3 03:44:13 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow
UNDO: Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375)
Ignore-this: 6871c15294113898902be90210d9a7a9
Contributed by: selio...@gmail.com
This patch modifies darcs-all to have feature parity with push-all by
recognizing two new
Mon Aug 3 03:44:13 PDT 2009 Simon Marlow
* Add -r option to darcs-all, and remove push-all (#3375)
Ignore-this: 6871c15294113898902be90210d9a7a9
Contributed by: selio...@gmail.com
This patch modifies darcs-all to have feature parity with push-all by
recognizing two new options
Fri May 15 13:36:46 PDT 2009 Ian Lynagh
* Remove --extra flag from darcs-all
M ./darcs-all -9 +3
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20090515203646-3fd76-b5e77fb76b967ee852cf1bf8be49f318a712b303.gz
___
Cvs-ghc
So I'm asking for comments: if you find these changes useful, and
they work for you, perhaps they get included;
I don't build ghc much (but nhc98 has a darcs-all script too...), so
That is exactly why I made those changes. I try to build ghc head
about once a month, which mean
> So I'm asking for comments: if you find these changes useful, and
> they work for you, perhaps they get included;
I don't build ghc much (but nhc98 has a darcs-all script too...), so
take my opinion with a pinch of salt. However, I do think both of these
changes are likely to
Talking with Neil about ghc build issues off list, I was reminded
that my local darcs-all still differs from the standard one. I have
occasionally posted it here, and small bits have made it into the
repo, but I don't really know why the main changes haven't made it.
So I'm aski
Wed Sep 10 17:13:48 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Tell perl to autoflush output in darcs-all. Suggested by Claus Reinke
M ./darcs-all +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080911001348-3fd76-e68686b997bb83a86631a3c81a81a322dd5bf
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>
> The darcs-all script is very useful, but could you pls add some comments at
> the start to explain the user interface?
Done! Please let me know if you'd like more detail about anything,
and of course feel fr
Thu Sep 4 05:54:12 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add darcs-all usage info
M ./darcs-all +18
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080904125412-3fd76-2ac84d9a95971889252752a21360d32e60f72e63.gz
___
C
Ian
The darcs-all script is very useful, but could you pls add some comments at the
start to explain the user interface?
I wanted to get extralibs today. Reading the code its seemed that --extra was
the thing to say. But
darcs-all get --extra
didn't work.
Turns out
Hi all,
You now need a haddock repo in your GHC tree, i.e. you'll need to
./darcs-all get
after pulling.
Thanks
Ian
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Wed Aug 13 15:01:58 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Teach darcs-all about absolute repos, and add haddock to packages
M ./darcs-all -1 +6
M ./packages +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080813220158
Mon Aug 25 07:59:08 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Read the packages file in strictly in darcs-all and push-all
This fixes a problem where darcs tries to update it while perl has it
open. On Windows this fails. Spotted by Claus Reinke.
M ./darcs-all -4 +10
M ./pu
Hi again,
as I mentioned here
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2008-August/044260.html
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2008-August/044275.html
I'd like to see some improvements to darcs-all. For reference, I attach
my current version of "darcs-all":
- stop
esn't trigger.
But moving the error report to darcs-all would get the error
message earlier; before running all of "boot;configure;make".
Indeed, darcs-all does try to report missing packages, but
is currently unaware of when it has updated itself, so again,
that test doesn't n
I think what SimonPJ suggested, that the build system just gives an
appropriate error message if a component is missing, would be much
easier to realise.
Manuel
Claus Reinke:
"darcs-all get; darcs-all pull -a; sh validate" instead of just the
latter two.
actually, since
My perl is very rusty, so I'll only sketch what I had in mind,
and leave it to someone with more recent perl exposure to
see whether this (completely untested!) code can be adapted
into working code for darcs-all:
argh, I hadn't quite realized how rusty. While haskell.org is
gone,
"darcs-all get; darcs-all pull -a; sh validate" instead of just the latter two.
actually, since pull might change darcs-all or packages, either of which
may change what "darcs-all get" does, that needs to be
"darcs-all pull -a; darcs-all get; sh validate"
which,
OK so the problem here was a missing package base3-compat, fixed by
darcs-all get
Suggestions (of an overlapping nature).
1. All: everyone who adds a core library should email cvs-ghc with a clear
heads-up to remind us to darcs-all get. (Same process for interface file
format changes
( cd base3-compat && /Users/chak/Code/ghc-test/libraries/cabal-bin /
opt/local/bin/ghc /Users/chak/Code/ghc-test/libraries/
bootstrapping.conf configure --prefix=/NONEXISTENT --bindir=/
NONEXISTENT --libdir=/NONEXISTENT --libexecdir=/NONEXISTENT --datadir=/
NONEXISTENT --docdir=/NONEXISTENT --h
Thu Aug 7 13:32:58 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix darcs-all get
M ./darcs-all -2 +2
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080807203258-3fd76-5e03a3ee2d1a67e18518570804a247e1041bf264.gz
___
C
Tue Jul 29 08:19:34 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add some comments to packages/darcs-all
M ./darcs-all -1 +1
M ./libraries/Makefile +2
M ./packages +3
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080729151934
Tue Jul 29 07:18:50 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add dph to ./packages and darcs-all
M ./darcs-all +5
M ./packages +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080729141850-3fd76-1edd591217b5d77cf9c0725a077ab1d800439
Claus Reinke wrote:
Thu Jul 24 09:41:42 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Rejig how darcs-all works
It's now easier to add new repos anywhere in the source tree
./libraries/boot-packages -> ./packages
If you do that kind of thing, you'll want to tell ./boot
Thu Jul 24 09:41:42 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Rejig how darcs-all works
It's now easier to add new repos anywhere in the source tree
./libraries/boot-packages -> ./packages
If you do that kind of thing, you'll want to tell ./boot about it!-)
And if tha
Thu Jul 24 09:41:53 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Follow darcs-all changes in push-all
M ./push-all -26 +30
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080724164153-3fd76-b613a7d7022adb4d9a6e3c77b680ba3c88790
Thu Jul 24 09:41:42 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Rejig how darcs-all works
It's now easier to add new repos anywhere in the source tree
./libraries/boot-packages -> ./packages
M ./darcs-all -71 +72
R ./libraries/extra-packages
M ./packages -21 +
Wed Jul 23 07:38:04 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Remove some redundancy in darcs-all
M ./darcs-all -7 +3
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080723143804-3fd76-197883576a8a46b5ad7ba98312f817e21ac93
Sat Jul 12 10:06:38 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Remove the hack to avoid darcs-all operating on bootstrapping directories
We no longer create those directories
M ./darcs-all -5 +1
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080712170638
I'm trying to do a "darcs-all pull -a", but darcs always seems to get
stuck at the same place, while trying to pull Cabal (as in: 100% CPU,
but nothing happening). This is darcs 1.0.9 release, Cygwin.
I've had that, too. Try doing darcs revert in Cabal. Looks like a darcs
Claus Reinke wrote:
I'm trying to do a "darcs-all pull -a", but darcs always seems to get
stuck at the same place, while trying to pull Cabal (as in: 100% CPU,
but nothing happening). This is darcs 1.0.9 release, Cygwin.
I've had that, too. Try doing darcs revert in Cabal
I'm trying to do a "darcs-all pull -a", but darcs always seems to
get stuck at the same place, while trying to pull Cabal (as in:
100% CPU, but nothing happening). This is darcs 1.0.9 release,
Cygwin.
Any suggestions?
Claus
./darcs-all pull -av 2>&1 | tee -a
Fri May 2 10:47:53 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Make darcs-all act on all repos in libraries/, not just boot/extra libs
M ./darcs-all -4 +18
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.8/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080502174753-3fd76-81e6534da1110a14ecea5221f4dbdca35f
Fri May 2 10:47:53 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Make darcs-all act on all repos in libraries/, not just boot/extra libs
M ./darcs-all -4 +18
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/_darcs/patches/20080502174753-3fd76-81e6534da1110a14ecea5221f4dbdca35fe25
Thu Sep 13 13:23:30 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Give darcs-all a -s (silent) flag
M ./darcs-all -4 +9
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Unfortunately, a change to darcs-all snug inadvertently into the
type families patch that breaks it for ssh repos at least with Perl
5.8.8 (on MacOS). A patch that reverts the change is in the repo
now. So, if you experience problems just do a plain "darcs pull"
first, then darcs-
Tue Aug 28 18:00:11 PDT 2007 Manuel M T Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* FIX: Remove accidential change to darcs-all in type families patch
- The type families patch includes a change to darcs-all that breaks it for
ssh repos at least for Perl 5.8.8 (on MacOS).
- My Perl-fu
Sat Aug 25 10:55:02 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Don't put push-all and darcs-all in source dists
We don't have the _darcs directories, so they won't work.
M ./Makefile -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 07:19:06PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
No, that doesn't work properly either.
./darcs-all --testsuite --nofib get --complete
warning: adding --partial, to override use --complete
== running darcs get --complete --partial
http://darcs.haskel
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 07:19:06PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
>
> No, that doesn't work properly either.
>
> ./darcs-all --testsuite --nofib get --complete
> warning: adding --partial, to override use --complete
> == running darcs get --complete --partial
> http://
Isaac Dupree wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:05:06PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
Thu Aug 9 12:22:17 BRT 2007 Isaac Dupree
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* fix darcs-all --complete
It was passing --complete on to darcs, which made darcs fail.
What version of darcs, an
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:05:06PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
Thu Aug 9 12:22:17 BRT 2007 Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* fix darcs-all --complete
It was passing --complete on to darcs, which made darcs fail.
What version of darcs, and with which darcs c
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:05:06PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> Thu Aug 9 12:22:17 BRT 2007 Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * fix darcs-all --complete
> It was passing --complete on to darcs, which made darcs fail.
What version of darcs, and with which darcs comm
Tue Jul 17 20:45:11 PDT 2007 Manuel M T Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* darcs-all: allow relative path for repo in local fs
M ./darcs-all -1 +6
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Wed Jun 20 16:40:07 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Don't assume that the main repo is called "ghc" in darcs-all
Fixes working in branches where that isn't true.
M ./darcs-all -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing lis
Sat May 12 03:35:42 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Use perl rather than sh to run darcs-all
M ./bin/nightly-wrk -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Hello,
Sun Apr 29 10:03:42 EDT 2007 Ian Lynagh igloo at earth.li wrote
(http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2007-April/035334.html):
> * Make darcs-all a perl script
> This fixes a problem where patches altering the darcs-all script break
> on Windows as the file is open. The
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 07:02:22PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
>
> btw, did you figure out why the previous version had the issue? as the
> script i sent demonstrated, cygwin shell scripts can even remove
> themselves while running. just the misterious 'darcs-all-0' had t
Mon Apr 30 05:16:15 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Call darcs-all get from boot
M ./Makefile -2 +2
M ./README -7 +2
M ./boot +5
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Mon Apr 30 03:16:12 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Look for -q in the darcs flags as well as the darcs-all flags
M ./darcs-all +5
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
There will be one more break when you get that patch, but from then on
things ought to be OK.
thanks. i did a 'darcs pull -p perl' to get your first patch, then a
'./darcs-all pull'
to test it with your second, and it seems to work. great, one serious trap
closed
at las
Sun Apr 29 10:27:34 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Put the darcs-all command parsing into main() so it can use @_
M ./darcs-all -20 +20
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:23:18PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
>
> how do i get rid of that discrepancy? should i just delete
> libraries/Cabal/_darcs/patches/pending ?
Yes, deleting it is fine (assuming it doesn't contain anything you want,
of course, as looks the case here).
Thanks
Ian
__
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:12:09PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
> i've just run into that 'sh darcs-all' updating darcs-all issue again!-(
OK, I believe I've just fixed that with
Sun Apr 29 15:00:04 BST 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Make darcs-all a perl
Sun Apr 29 07:00:04 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Make darcs-all a perl script
This fixes a problem where patches altering the darcs-all script break
on Windows as the file is open. The script is now also slightly nicer,
on balance.
M ./Makefile -1 +1
M ./README
i've just run into that 'sh darcs-all' updating darcs-all issue again!-(
i think i've restored my local repo (made a copy, did 'darcs revert'
in the copy, then 'diff ghc ghc2', then copied over the changes that
were actually mine..). but even after
i've just run into that 'sh darcs-all' updating darcs-all issue again!-(
in addition to fixing that issue, perhaps darcs-all could run 'whatsnew'
before each 'pull', and log the result somewhere?
that way, if anything else goes wrong with darcs, one might
i've just run into that 'sh darcs-all' updating darcs-all issue again!-(
while i'm trying to reconstruct my repo once again, i was wondering
whether we might do something to avoid this trouble with darcs-all
updating itself, which is somewhat dubious anyway, and will f
Wed Apr 25 05:46:20 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Tweak darcs-all script
If you got darcs by SSH without specifying a username then the script
would break.
M ./darcs-all -1 +3
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.or
Tue Apr 10 18:22:58 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Use "$@" rather than $* when calling things in darcs-all
M ./darcs-all -16 +16
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
?
A final note: Although it is a good thing that each repository (GHC/Hugs/nhc)
has its own package-list file, it is a bit ugly that they will have identical
copies of darcs-all. Although this is much better than 3 totally different
scripts, it is not nice from a maintenance point of
Sun Apr 1 07:14:24 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* MERGED: Fix darcs-all to be usable with shells other than bash
M ./darcs-all -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Tue Mar 6 09:30:11 PST 2007 Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix darcs-all to be usable with shells other than bash
M ./darcs-all -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
Wed Feb 7 09:03:20 PST 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* MERGE: Teach darcs-all how to get testsuite and nofib
Wed Feb 7 16:53:44 GMT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
M ./darcs-all -4 +37
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc
Wed Feb 7 08:53:44 PST 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Teach darcs-all how to get testsuite and nofib
M ./darcs-all -6 +41
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
98 matches
Mail list logo
