Mitchell, Neil wrote:
FWIW, I had some validate failures under windows dependening
on which shell I used. I have to check again which one it
was, though.
For information, my shell is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /cygdrive/c/ghc-build/ghc
$ help
GNU bash, version 3.2.39(20)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
> FWIW, I had some validate failures under windows dependening
> on which shell I used. I have to check again which one it
> was, though.
For information, my shell is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /cygdrive/c/ghc-build/ghc
$ help
GNU bash, version 3.2.39(20)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
And I now am down
FWIW, I had some validate failures under windows dependening on which
shell I used. I have to check again which one it was, though.
2008/10/22 Mitchell, Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
>
>> > Could it be that buffering has a different default on Windows?
>>
>> 2228 is now an expected failure on
Hi
> > Could it be that buffering has a different default on Windows?
>
> 2228 is now an expected failure on Windows. See #2628.
Fair enough.
> > As a secondary issue, it appears that the failure reports
> are occuring
> > after the script has started to print out information about
> the n
Mitchell, Neil wrote:
Thanks Thorkil, more information:
=> 2228(normal)
cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2228
2228.run.stdout 2>2228.run.stderr
=> 2636(normal)
cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2636
2636.run.stdout 2>2636.run.stderr
Actual stdo
Hi Neil,
On Friday 17 October 2008 17:56, Mitchell, Neil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Thorkil, more information:
>
> => 2228(normal)
> cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2228
> 2228.run.stdout 2>2228.run.stderr
> => 2636(normal)
> cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-
; -Original Message-
> From: Thorkil Naur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 October 2008 4:53 pm
> To: Mitchell, Neil
> Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org
> Subject: Re: Validation failures under Windows
>
> Hello,
>
> On Friday 17 October 2008 17:41, Mitchell, Neil wro
Hello,
On Friday 17 October 2008 17:41, Mitchell, Neil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Doing validation under Windows XP, using HEAD from a few hours ago, I
> get the results:
>
> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at The current date is: 17/10/2008
> Enter the new date: (dd-mm-yy)
> 2221 total tests, wh
Hi,
Doing validation under Windows XP, using HEAD from a few hours ago, I
get the results:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at The current date is: 17/10/2008
Enter the new date: (dd-mm-yy)
2221 total tests, which gave rise to
8313 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failur
