Hello,
With your recent patches applied, validate for
> checking version of ghc... 6.2
ends like this
> /usr/bin/ghc -Werror -H64m -Onot -fasm -istage1/utils -istage1/basicTypes
-istage1/types -istage1/hsSyn -istage1/prelude -istage1/rename
-istage1/typecheck -istage1/deSugar -istage
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:46:30PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:41:50PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, I think changing the test in compat/cbits/unicode.c to
> >
> > #if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ < 605
> > #if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ != 604 || __GHC_PATCHLEVEL__ != 0
>
> I
Hi Thorkil,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:47:48PM +0200, Thorkil Naur wrote:
>
> On Monday 17 September 2007 14:41, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > ...
> > So just to check, you can reproduce the failure with the ghc -Werror
> > commandline, and if you remove -Werror then it works?
>
> Exactly: With -Werror
Hello,
On Monday 17 September 2007 14:41, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> ...
> So just to check, you can reproduce the failure with the ghc -Werror
> commandline, and if you remove -Werror then it works?
Exactly: With -Werror, the warnings are reported, the exit status is 1, and no
code is generated:
> $
Hi Thorkil,
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 08:06:30PM +0200, Thorkil Naur wrote:
>
> On my x86 (SuSE) Linux, validate ends like this:
>
> > /usr/bin/ghc -Werror -H64m -Onot -fasm -istage1/utils
> > [...]
> >
> > utils/Encoding.hs:144: Warning: Defined but not used: c
> >
> > [...]
> > make[1]: *** [s
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:41:50PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> Hmm, I think changing the test in compat/cbits/unicode.c to
>
> #if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ < 605
> #if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ != 604 || __GHC_PATCHLEVEL__ != 0
I mean:
#if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ != 604 || __GHC_PATCHLEVEL__ == 0
> #include
Hello,
On my x86 (SuSE) Linux, validate ends like this:
>
> == make all -r --jobserver-fds=3,4 -j;
>
in
/home/tn/tn/GHCDarcsRepository/ghc-HEAD-complete-for-validating-20070913_2116/ghc/compiler
>
