On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:22:03PM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> I think that's all mine. arrowfail001 fails with stage=1 (with an ASSERT
> error, and it *is* wrong)
I think it'll only fail with a DEBUG compiler. I've updated the test
accordingly.
Thanks
Ian
arlow; GHC CVS list
| Subject: RE: Validate failures of the day
|
| I fixed 5691, 7264, 5130
|
| Simon
|
| | -Original Message-
| | From: cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org]
| | On Behalf Of Simon Marlow
| | Sent: 31 October 2012 12:37
| | To: GHC CVS list
| | Su
I fixed 5691, 7264, 5130
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-boun...@haskell.org]
| On Behalf Of Simon Marlow
| Sent: 31 October 2012 12:37
| To: GHC CVS list
| Subject: Validate failures of the day
|
| Here's a selection of today'
Here's a selection of today's validate failures on x86_64/Linux for your
enjoyment.
1 unexpected passes
13 unexpected failures
And that's on our best supported platform. Now, one of those is due to
local changes in my tree, and another 4 are due to a linking issue that
breaks a
